Skip to main content
Log in

Management of partial Müllerian agenesis: staged McIndoe procedure for the creation of a neovagina and utero-neovaginal unification

  • IUJ Video
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The objectives of this video are to provide a brief overview of Müllerian agenesis, discuss a case of partial vaginal agenesis with a functional uterus, and present the steps of a staged McIndoe procedure for the creation of a neovagina and utero-neovaginal unification.

Methods

We give an overview of Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser syndrome, and review its incidence, clinical presentation, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment options. We present the case of a 23-year-old woman with partial vaginal agenesis, and her clinical course through conservative management with hormonal suppression and dilator therapy leading up to urogynecological surgical treatment. We describe a staged surgical approach that highlights the value of cystoscopy and laparoscopy to better delineate our patient’s anatomical variations. Additionally, a mini-laparotomy and placement of an intrauterine Malecot catheter allowed for the drainage of prominent hematometra, relief of menstrual outflow obstruction, and epithelialization of a tract between the uterus and the planned neovaginal space. Ultimately, a neovagina was created using a staged McIndoe technique, leading to utero-neovaginal unification and unobstructed menses.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our approach should be considered a feasible option for anatomical restoration via the creation of a neovagina in patients with Müllerian anomalies, even in the presence of a functional uterus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Chandler TM, Machan LS, Cooperberg PL, Harris AC, Chang SD. Mullerian duct anomalies: from diagnosis to intervention. Br J Radiol. 2009;82(984):1034–42. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/99354802.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Passos IMPE, Britto RL. Diagnosis and treatment of müllerian malformations. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;59(2):183–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2020.01.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sugi MD, Penna R, Jha P, et al. Müllerian duct anomalies: role in fertility and pregnancy. Radiographics. 2021;41(6):1857–75. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2021210022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sugiura-Ogasawara M, Ozaki Y, Suzumori N. Müllerian anomalies and recurrent miscarriage. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2013;25(4):293–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0b013e3283632849.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Morcel K, Camborieux L, Programme de Recherches sur les Aplasies Müllériennes, Guerrier D. Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2007;2:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-1172-2-13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Carranza-Lira S, Forbin K, Martinez-Chequer JC. Rokitansky syndrome and MURCS association—clinical features and basis for diagnosis. Int J Fertil Womens Med. 1999;44:250–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alejandro Gómez-Viso.

Ethics declarations

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this video article and any accompanying images.

Conflicts of interest

A. Gómez-Viso and B. May declare that they have no conflicts of interest. C. Kisby has received research sponsorship from RION LLC. Her research is supported by the Duke K12 Urologic Research Career Development Program (K12DK100024) and the Duke Office of Physician Scientist Development Fund to Retain Clinician Scientists.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

(MP4 88138 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gómez-Viso, A., May, B. & Kisby, C. Management of partial Müllerian agenesis: staged McIndoe procedure for the creation of a neovagina and utero-neovaginal unification. Int Urogynecol J 34, 1983–1985 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-023-05485-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-023-05485-6

Keywords

Navigation