Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Outcomes of the anterior approach versus posterior sacrospinous ligament fixation for pelvic organ prolapse

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

This study aimed to compare anterior sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) with the standard posterior SSLF concerning complications and outcomes in patients with apical compartment pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

Methods

This is an observational descriptive study using prospective data collected from two referral urogynecological centers. The study cohort represents all 135 women in our prospective study who underwent anterior approach bilateral anterior or unilateral posterior meshless SSLF from January 2018 to December 2020 using the PFDI-20 questionnaire and the POP quantification (POP-Q) system pre- and postoperatively. The objective success rate was assessed by the number of POP recurrence cases and total vaginal length (TVL) postoperatively. Patients were followed up for at least 6 months (range, 6 to 18 months). Data were analyzed using SPSS version 21. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Sixty-seven (49.6%) patients underwent posterior SSLF, and 68 (50.4%) underwent anterior SSLF. The mean age of patients was 58.2 ± 9.7 and 64.9 ± 11.6, respectively (P < 0.001). Most patients who underwent the posterior approach had stage III apical prolapse (74.6%), while 65.5% of those who underwent anterior SSLF had stage II apical prolapse (P < 0.001). Following the treatment, no significant difference was detected between these two vaginal approaches in terms of women’s satisfaction rate (P > 0.05). One case of postoperative recurrence was found in the posterior group, which ultimately led to surgical retreatment. There were no major intra- or postoperative complications in the groups. Postoperative TVL was higher in the anterior SSLF group (P < 0.001). The postoperative POPDI-6, CRADI-8, UDI-6, and PFDI-20 decreased significantly compared to preoperative status in both groups (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

It appears that the anterior SSLF approach can be regarded as effective as the posterior approach in the management of apical POP. Therefore, the proper surgical technique can be chosen according to the surgeon’s expertise and other compartment's prolapse status.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dangal G, Poudel R, Shrestha R, Karki A, Pradhan HK, Bhattachan K, et al. Outcome of sacrospinous ligament fixation of the vault during repair of pelvic organ prolapse. J Nepal Health Res Council. 2018;16(3):321–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yalcin Y, Demir Caltekin M, Eris YS. Quality of life and sexuality after bilateral sacrospinous fixation with vaginal hysterectomy for treatment of primary pelvic organ prolapse. Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms. 2020;12(3):206–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wu JM, Matthews CA, Conover MM, Pate V, Jonsson FM. Lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(6):1201–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang W, Cheon WC, Zhang L, Wang X, Wei Y, Lyu C. Comparison of the effectiveness of sacrospinous ligament fixation and sacrocolpopexy: a meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2022;33(1):3–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-04823-w.

  5. Greisen S, Axelsen SM, Bek KM, Guldberg R, Glavind-Kristensen M. Fast track sacrospinous ligament fixation: subjective and objective outcomes at 6 months. BMC Women's Health. 2021;21(1):154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ren C, Zhu L. Safety and efficacy of ischial spine fascia and sacrospinous ligament fixation for symptomatic stage 2 and 3 apical prolapse. Int J Gynaecol Obstet: Off Organ the Int Federation Gynaecol Obstet. 2020;149(3):292–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Topdagi Yilmaz EP, Yapca OE, Topdagi YE, Atakan Al R, Kumtepe Y. Comparison of two natural tissue repair-based surgical techniques; sacrospinous fixation and uterosacral ligament suspension for pelvic organ prolapse treatment. J Gynecol obstet Human Reprod. 2021;50(4):101905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Betschart C, Cervigni M, Contreras Ortiz O, Doumouchtsis SK, Koyama M, Medina C, et al. Management of apical compartment prolapse (uterine and vault prolapse): A FIGO Working Group report. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36(2):507–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Garcia AN, Ulker A, Aserlind A, Timmons D, Medina CA. Enlargement of the genital hiatus is associated with prolapse recurrence in patients undergoing sacrospinous ligament fixation. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022;157(1):96–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13828.

  10. Husby KR, Larsen MD, Lose G, Klarskov N. Surgical repair of vaginal vault prolapse; a comparison between ipsilateral uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation-a nationwide cohort study. Int Urogynecol J. 2021;32(6):1441–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04515-x.

  11. Declas E, Giraudet G, De Graer C, Bengler C, Delplanque S, Cosson M. How we do an anterior sacrospinous ligament fixation for vaginal vault prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2021;32(12):3305–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Milani R, Frigerio M, Manodoro S. Transvaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation for posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse repair. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(7):1103–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3255-6.

  13. Senturk MB, Doğan O. Sacrospinous ligament fixation under local anesthesia in elderly patients at high risk of general anesthesia. J Invest Surg. 2020;33(1):1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Siddiqui S, Gayen A, Wong V. Short-term outcomes of anterior approach sacrospinous ligament fixation for apical vaginal prolapse—A retrospective study. Facts, Views Vis ObGyn. 2021;13(2):169–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Teleman P, Laurikainen E, Kinne I, Pogosean R, Jakobsson U, Rudnicki M. Relationship between the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system (POP-Q), the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7), and the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) before and after anterior vaginal wall prolapse surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(2):195–200.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC. Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(1):103–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rooney K, Kenton K, Mueller ER, FitzGerald MP, Brubaker L. Advanced anterior vaginal wall prolapse is highly correlated with apical prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195(6):1837–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Summers A, Winkel LA, Hussain HK, DeLancey JO. The relationship between anterior and apical compartment support. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194(5):1438–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen L, Ashton-Miller JA, Hsu Y, DeLancey JO. Interaction among apical support, levator ani impairment, and anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(2):324–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jelovsek JE, Barber MD, Brubaker L, Norton P, Gantz M, Richter HE, et al. Effect of uterosacral ligament suspension vs sacrospinous ligament fixation with or without perioperative behavioral therapy for pelvic organ vaginal prolapse on surgical outcomes and prolapse symptoms at 5 years in the OPTIMAL randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319(15):1554–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Memon FaR, Mohamed M. Sacrospinous ligament fixation, a safe and effective way to manage vaginal vault prolapse.a 10-year observational study of clinical practice. Journal of University Medical & Dental College. 9(1);44-48. Retrieved from http://www.jumdc.com/index.php/jumdc/article/view/50

  22. Barber MD, Brubaker L, Burgio KL, Richter HE, Nygaard I, Weidner AC, et al. Comparison of 2 transvaginal surgical approaches and perioperative behavioral therapy for apical vaginal prolapse: the OPTIMAL randomized trial. Jama. 2014;311(10):1023–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Meyer I, Whitworth RE, Lukacz ES, Smith AL, Sung VW, Visco AG, et al. Outcomes of native tissue transvaginal apical approaches in women with advanced pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(10):2155–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Geynisman-Tan J, Kenton K. Surgical updates in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Rambam Maimonides Med J. 2017;8(2):e0017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Solomon ER, St Marie P, Jones KA, Harmanli O. Anterior bilateral sacrospinous ligament fixation: a safe route for apical repair. Female Pelvic Med Reconstruct Surg. 2020;26(8):e33–e6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Goldberg RP, Tomezsko JE, Winkler HA, Koduri S, Culligan PJ, Sand PK. Anterior or posterior sacrospinous vaginal vault suspension: long-term anatomic and functional evaluation. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98(2):199–204.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Research Vice-chancellor of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences for approval of the study. The regional ethics committee of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences approved this study (IR.TBZMED.REC.1399.693).

Funding

This study was supported by the Research Vice-chancellor of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (grant no. 66046).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Women’s Reproductive Health Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

    Parvin Bastani

  2. Urology Department, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

    Sona Tayebi

  3. Road Traffic Injury Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

    Amir Ghabousian

  4. Research Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, Iranian EBM Center: A Joanna Briggs Institute Center of Excellence, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

    Hanieh Salehi-Pourmehr & Sakineh Hajebrahimi

  5. Research Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, Iranian EBM Center: A Joanna Briggs Institute Center of Excellence, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Azadi Street-Golgasht Ave, Tabriz, East Azarbaijan, 5166/15731, Iran

    Sakineh Hajebrahimi

Authors
  1. Parvin Bastani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sona Tayebi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Amir Ghabousian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hanieh Salehi-Pourmehr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sakineh Hajebrahimi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Parvin Bastani: Project development, Data collection

Sona Tayebi: Manuscript writing

Amir Ghabousian: Manuscript writing

Hanieh Salehi-Pourmehr:Manuscript writing, data analysis

Sakineh Hajebrahimi:Project development, Data collection

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Parvin Bastani or Sakineh Hajebrahimi.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bastani, P., Tayebi, S., Ghabousian, A. et al. Outcomes of the anterior approach versus posterior sacrospinous ligament fixation for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 33, 1857–1862 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05171-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05171-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation