Skip to main content
Log in

Lies, damned lies, and pelvic floor illustration: Confused about pelvic floor anatomy? You are not alone

  • Clinical Opinion
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dissection reveals elegant simplicity in pelvic floor structure. So, why are so many of us confused about the pelvic floor? The pelvic floor is in an invisible region between what we see from above and below, so our experience does not help. It is confusing because there is conflict between existing illustrations, so we do not know which are false and which are true. To resolve conflicts in pelvic anatomy we must: recognize the Vesalian principle that truth lies in the body, not necessarily in books; commit to focusing on structures rather than words; and overcome “theory-induced blindness,” the psychological principle that discounts what is seen when it contradicts a theory we believe. We should revive century-old standards that require accuracy in anatomical illustration analogous to the p value in statistics. Committing to anatomical accuracy will ensure that we no longer navigate in surgery and research using a flawed map.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This value is not even evidence based. It was just made up in the 1930s by R. A. Fischer, who did not think it was the only value that could be used; he also discussed using 0.1, 0.01, and other values depending on the situation.

References

  1. Kearney R, Sawhney R, DeLancey JO. Levator ani muscle anatomy evaluated by origin-insertion pairs. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(1):168–73. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000128906.61529.6b.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Jeppson PC, Balgobin S, Washington BB, Hill AJ, Lewicky-Gaupp C, Wheeler T 2nd, Ridgeway B, Mazloomdoost D, Balk EM, Corton MM, DeLancey J, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons Pelvic Anatomy Group. Recommended standardized terminology of the anterior female pelvis based on a structured medical literature review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;219(1):26–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2018.04.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Balgobin S, Jeppson PC, Wheeler T 2nd, Hill AJ, Mishra K, Mazloomdoost D, Dunivan GC, Anand M, Mama ST, Bochenska K, Lewicky-Gaupp C, Balk EM, DeLancey J, Corton MM, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons Pelvic Anatomy Group. Standardized terminology of apical structures in the female pelvis based on a structured medical literature review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222(3):204–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.11.1262.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bacon F. Of unity and religion. In: Essays, civil and moral. New York: Collier; 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Keynes JM. Preface. In: The general theory of employment, interest and money. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Halban J, Tandler J. Anatomie und Aetiologie der Genitalprolapse beim Weibe. Vienna and Leipzig: Wilhelm Braumuller; 1907.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Braune W. An atlas of topographical anatomy after plane sections of frozen bodies. London: Churchill; 1877.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.O. DeLancey: all aspects.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John O. L. DeLancey.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

DeLancey, J.O.L. Lies, damned lies, and pelvic floor illustration: Confused about pelvic floor anatomy? You are not alone. Int Urogynecol J 33, 453–457 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05087-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05087-8

Keywords

Navigation