Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

External kinesiology tape for improvement in fecal incontinence symptom bother in women: a pilot study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Fecal incontinence is a debilitating condition with a devastating impact on quality of life. Using a commercially available kinesiology band we developed an anal tape to be applied to the anus with the aim to determine its impact on symptom bother and quality of life.

Methods

Four-week prospective, self-controlled, pilot study of patients with FI. The primary outcome was improvement in any of the four domains (lifestyle, coping/behavior, depression/self-perception, embarrassment) evaluated by the “Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale.” Secondary outcomes included improvement in frequency of incontinence events and safety. Days 0–14 served as control period and days 15–28 as study period. Patients were asked to rate their satisfaction and willingness to use the device in the future using a 10-cm continuous visual analog scale.

Results

Twenty patients completed the study. Median age was 64 years; all patients were females. Significant improvements were observed in all domains of the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale from baseline to day 28 (p < 0.001 for all) and in three of four domains between day 15 and 28 (p < 0.04) but not between days 1 and 14. Five patients (25%) had a ≥ 50% improvement in incontinence events. Patients reported satisfaction and willingness to use the anal tape in the future. Other than mild difficulty to remove the anal tape, no adverse events were reported.

Conclusions

In this small pilot study, the use of the anal tape was safe and effective. The primary outcome of significant improvement in quality of life was achieved (ClinicalTrials.gov ID:NCT02989545).

Public trial registry

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02989545. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02989545

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

EAUS:

Endoanal ultrasound

FI :

Fecal incontinent

FIQoLS :

Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale

IQR:

Interquartile range

MICD:

Minimum clinically important difference

OASIS:

Obstetric anal sphincter injuries

QoL:

Quality of life

References

  1. Rao SS, Bharucha AE, Chiarioni G, Felt-Bersma R, Knowles C, Malcolm A, Wald A. Functional anorectal disorders. Gastroenterology. 2016;150(6):1430–42.

  2. Meyer I, Richter HE. Impact of fecal incontinence and its treatment on quality of life in women. Womens Health Lond Engl. 2015;11(2):225–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mundet L, Ribas Y, Arco S, Clavé P. Quality of life differences in female and male patients with fecal incontinence. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016;22(1):94–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rothbarth J, Bemelman WA, Meijerink WJHJ, Stiggelbout AM, Zwinderman AH, Buyze-Westerweel ME, Delemarre JBVM. What is the impact of fecal incontinence on quality of life? Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44(1):67–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bharucha AE, Zinsmeister AR, Locke GR, Schleck C, McKeon K, Melton LJ. Symptoms and quality of life in community women with fecal incontinence. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;4(8):1004–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. AlAmeel T, Andrew MK, MacKnight C. The association of fecal incontinence with institutionalization and mortality in older adults. Off J Am Coll Gastroenterol ACG. 2010;105(8):1830–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Grover M, Whitehead WE. Is fecal incontinence a risk factor for institutionalization in the elderly? Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106(2):366–7. author reply 367.

  8. Brown HW, Rogers RG, Wise ME. Barriers to seeking care for accidental bowel leakage: a qualitative study. Int Urogynecology J. 2017;28(4):543–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brown HW, Wexner SD, Lukacz ES. Factors associated with care seeking among women with accidental bowel leakage. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2013;19(2):66–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Johanson JF, Lafferty J. Epidemiology of fecal incontinence: the silent affliction. Am J Gastroenterol. 1996;91(1):33–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Macmillan AK, Merrie AEH, Marshall RJ, Parry BR. The prevalence of fecal incontinence in community-dwelling adults: a systematic review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47(8):1341–9.

  12. Nelson R, Norton N, Cautley E, Furner S. Community-based prevalence of anal incontinence. JAMA. 1995;274(7):559–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Perry S, Shaw C, McGrother C, Matthews RJ, Assassa RP, Dallosso H, Williams K, Brittain KR, Azam U, Clarke M, Jagger C, Mayne C, Castleden CM. Leicestershire MRC incontinence study team. Prevalence of faecal incontinence in adults aged 40 years or more living in the community. Gut. 2002;50(4):480–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Whitehead WE, Borrud L, Goode PS, Meikle S, Mueller ER, Tuteja A, Weidner A, Weinstein M, Ye W, Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Fecal incontinence in US adults: epidemiology and risk factors. Gastroenterology. 2009;137(2):512–7, 517.e1–2.

  15. Norton C, Whitehead WE, Bliss DZ, Harari D, Lang J. Conservative Management of Fecal Incontinence in adults Committee of the International Consultation on incontinence. Management of fecal incontinence in adults. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(1):199–206.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wald A, Bharucha AE, Cosman BC, Whitehead WE. ACG clinical guideline: management of benign anorectal disorders. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109(8):1141–57; (Quiz) 1058.

  17. Bharucha AE, Rao SSC, Shin AS. Surgical interventions and the use of device-aided therapy for the treatment of fecal incontinence and Defecatory disorders. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Off Clin Pract J Am Gastroenterol Assoc. 2017;15(12):1844–54.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Boyer O, Bridoux V, Giverne C, Bisson A, Koning E, Leroi A-M, Chambon P, Déhayes J, Le Corre S, Jacquot S, Bastit D, Martinet J, Houivet E, Tuech J-J, Benichou J, Michot F, The Study Group of Myoblast Therapy for Faecal Incontinence. Autologous myoblasts for the treatment of fecal incontinence: results of a phase 2 randomized placebo-controlled study (MIAS). Ann Surg. 2018;267(3):443–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chiarioni G, Bassotti G, Stanganini S, Vantini I, Whitehead WE, Stegagnini S. Sensory retraining is key to biofeedback therapy for formed stool fecal incontinence. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97(1):109–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Heymen S, Scarlett Y, Jones K, Ringel Y, Drossman D, Whitehead WE. Randomized controlled trial shows biofeedback to be superior to pelvic floor exercises for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52(10):1730–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Velde SV, Biervliet SV, Bruyne RD, Winckel MV. A systematic review on bowel management and the success rate of the various treatment modalities in spina bifida patients. Spinal Cord. 2013;51(12):873–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Deutekom M, Dobben AC. Plugs for containing faecal incontinence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;7:CD005086.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lukacz ES, Segall MM, Wexner SD. Evaluation of an anal insert device for the conservative management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015;58(9):892–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ness W. Faecal incontinence: causes, assessment and management. Nurs Stand R Coll Nurs G B 1987. 2012;26(42):52–4, 56, 58–60.

  25. Wilson V, Douris P, Fukuroku T, Kuzniewski M, Dias J, Figueiredo P. The immediate and long-term effects of KINESIOTAPE® on balance and functional performance. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2016;11(2):247–53.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Noelting J, Zinsmeister AR, Bharucha AE. Validating endpoints for therapeutic trials in fecal incontinence. Neurogastroenterol Motil Off J Eur Gastrointest Motil Soc. 2016;28(8):1148–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36(1):77–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Rao SSC. Endpoints for therapeutic interventions in fecal incontinence: small step or game changer. Neurogastroenterol Motil Off J Eur Gastrointest Motil Soc. 2016;28(8):1123–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No external funding was used for this study; all costs were covered by the internal budget of our department.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Dan M Livovsky: Conceptualization; Data curation; Formal analysis of results; Conducting of investigations; Conceptualization of methodology, Writing of manuscript. This author has approved the final draft submitted.

Benjamin Koslowsky: Data curation; Review and editing of original draft.

Eran Goldin: Funding acquisition (internal, no external founding was used in this study): supervisor of the project, administrator of resources.

Joseph Lysy: Original idea and concept, data curation; Analysis of data; Funding acquisition; Conducted investigation and responsible for patient care; Methodology review; Project administration: supervision of project: review and editing of original draft.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dan M. Livovsky.

Ethics declarations

Potential competing interests

None.

Ethics approval

The study protocol conforms to the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki and was approved, a priori, by the ethics review board of ShaareZedek Medical Center (approval date and number: 21/02/2016; 0229–16-SZMC).

Consent to participate

Witten informed consent was obtained from all patients before participation in any of the study procedures.

Grant support

No finical support was obtained for this study.

Financial support

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(DOCX 2086 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Livovsky, D.M., Koslowsky, B., Goldin, E. et al. External kinesiology tape for improvement in fecal incontinence symptom bother in women: a pilot study. Int Urogynecol J 33, 2859–2868 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-05050-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-05050-z

Keywords

Navigation