Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The effect of pelvic floor exercises performed with EMG biofeedback or a vaginal cone on incontinence severity, pelvic floor muscle strength, and quality of life in women with stress urinary incontinence: a randomized, 6-month follow-up study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The objective was to assess the effectiveness of pelvic floor exercises performed with electromyographic (EMG) biofeedback or a vaginal cone on incontinence severity, muscle strength, social activity level, quality of life, treatment success, and treatment satisfaction in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

Methods

This prospective, randomized study included 40 female patients diagnosed with SUI. Patients were randomly divided into two groups as the group receiving pelvic floor muscle exercise (PFME) with a vaginal cone at home (n = 20) and the group receiving PFME with EMG biofeedback in the hospital (n = 20). The measurement of urinary incontinence severity with a 1-h pad test, assessment of social activity with the social activity index (SAI), assessment of incontinence-specific quality of life, manual measurement of pelvic floor muscle strength, and the assessment of treatment satisfaction were performed in the pre-treatment period and post-treatment at 3 and 6 months.

Results

In intragroup analyses, an improvement was observed in both groups in the pad test, muscle strength, SAI, quality of life, and treatment satisfaction measurement compared with the pre-treatment period (p < 0.05). No significant difference was found between the groups in terms of assessment parameters in intergroup analyses during follow-up (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

It was concluded that both EMG biofeedback assisted PFME and PFME with a vaginal cone had curative effects on incontinence in patients with SUI. We believe that both protocols can be used as acceptable and effective conservative therapy methods in the treatment of women with SUI considering their preference.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Langa KM, Fultz NH, Saint S, et al. Informal caregiving time and costs for urinary incontinence in older individuals in the United States. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50:733–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Melville JL, Katon W, Delaney K, et al. Urinary incontinence in US women: a population-based 369 study. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:537–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Haylen BT, Ridder D, Freeman RM, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2020;29:4–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Moroni R, Magnani P, Haddad J, et al. Conservative treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2016;38:97–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dumoulin C, Hay Smith EJC, Mac Habée-Séguin G. Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;14:CD005654.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bo K, Frawley HC, Haylen BT, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for the conservative and nonpharmacological management of female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36:221–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hagen S, Elders A , Stratton S, et al. Effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle training with and without electromyographic biofeedback for urinary incontinence in women: multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2020;371:m3719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Burns PA, Pranikoff K, Nochajski TH, et al. A comparison of effectiveness of biofeedback and pelvic floor muscle exercise treatment of stress incontinence in older community-dwelling women. J Gerontol. 1993;48:167–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Karantanis E, Allen W, Stevermer L. The repeatability of the 24 hour pad test centre for health service development. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2005;16:63–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Volloyhaug I, Morkved S, Salvasen O, et al. Assessment of pelvic floor muscle contraction with palpation, perineometry and transperineal ultrasound: a cross-sectional study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47:768–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Aksac B, Aki S, Karan A, et al. Biofeedback and pelvic floor exercises for the rehabilitation of urinary stress incontinence. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2003;56:23–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cetin C, Sakallı M, Ay P. Validation of the short form of the incontinence impact questionnaire (IIQ-7) and the urogenital distress inventory (UDI6) in a Turkish population. Neurourol Urodyn. 2007;26:129–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shah AD, Massagli MP, Kohli N, et al. A reliable, valid instrument to assess patient knowledge about urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19:1283–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Faiena I, Patel N, Parihar JS, et al. Conservative management of urinary incontinence in women. Rev Urol. 2015;17:129–39.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Hay-Smith EJ, Bo K, Berghmans LC, et al. Pelvic floor muscle training for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;(1):CD001407.

  16. Qaseem A, Dallas P, Forciea MA, et al. Nonsurgical management of urinary incontinence in women: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2014;161:429–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gómez MFL, Abuín JMS, Criado FJG, et al. Treatment of stress urinary incontinence with perineal biofeedback by using superficial electrodes. Actas Urol Esp. 2008;32:629–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Huebner M, Riegel K, Hinninghofen H, et al. Pelvic floor muscle training for stress urinary incontinence: a randomized, controlled trial comparing different conservative therapies. Physiother Res Int. 2011;16:133–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bø K, Talseth T, Holme I. Single blind, randomised controlled trial of pelvic floor exercises, electrical stimulation, vaginal cones, and no treatment in management of genuine stress incontinence in women. BMJ. 1999;318:487–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Santos PFD, Oliveira E, Zanetti MRD, et al. Electrical stimulation of the pelvic floor versus vaginal cone therapy for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2009;31:447–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

We do not have any financial relationship for this research and no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

N. Sahin: project development, data collection, manuscript writing; H. Yesil: data collection, analyzing, manuscript writing; B. Gorcan: project development, data collection, manuscript writing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hilal Yesil.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sahin, N., Yesil, H. & Gorcan, B. The effect of pelvic floor exercises performed with EMG biofeedback or a vaginal cone on incontinence severity, pelvic floor muscle strength, and quality of life in women with stress urinary incontinence: a randomized, 6-month follow-up study. Int Urogynecol J 33, 2773–2779 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-05006-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-05006-3

Keywords

Navigation