This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Liu L, Zheng Z, Wang Y. Commentary on "Are there differences in short-term pelvic floor muscle function after cesarean section or vaginal 1 delivery in primiparous women? A systematic review with meta-analysis". Int Urogynecol J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-04958-w
Driusso P, Beleza ACS, Mira DM, et al. Are there differences in short-term pelvic floor muscle function after cesarean section or vaginal delivery in primiparous women? A systematic review with meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(8):1497–506.
Woodley SJ, Lawrenson P, Boyle R, Cody JD, Mørkved S, Kernohan A, et al. Pelvic floor muscle training for preventing and treating urinary and faecal incontinence in antenatal and postnatal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;5(5):CD007471.
Takmaz T, Aydin S, Gorchiyeva I, Karasu AFG. The usual suspect: cross-sectional study of fundal pressure at second stage of delivery and the association with pelvic floor damage. Int Urogynecol J. 2021;32(7):1917–24.
Higgins JT, Thomas J, Chandler J. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, 2nd Ed. VitalSource Bookshelf version. Chichester: Wiley, 2019.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Driusso, P., Beleza, A.C.S., de Oliveira Sato, T. et al. Authors’ Reply: Commentary on "Are there differences in short-term pelvic floor muscle function after cesarean section or vaginal delivery in primiparous women? A systematic review with meta-analysis". Int Urogynecol J 33, 165–166 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-05000-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-05000-9