Abstract
Damage to the pelvic floor during pregnancy and vaginal delivery is an inevitable consequence of the natural birthing process. As this damage is associated with functional and anatomical problems in later life, minimizing pelvic floor damage during pregnancy and vaginal delivery may serve as an important factor in the prevention of these unwanted sequelae. Operative vaginal delivery using forceps or vacuum extractor is common practice to achieve or expedite vaginal birth for maternal or fetal indications such as maternal exhaustion or fetal distress. However, operative vaginal delivery is associated with more extensive damage to the pelvic floor and perineal structures with forceps carrying a stronger risk compared to vacuum. The evidence on this subject is discussed with possible suggestions to minimize pelvic floor damage as much as possible.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Macfarlane AJ, Blondel B, Mohangoo AD, Cuttini M, Nijhuis J, Novak Z, et al. Wide differences in mode of delivery within Europe: risk-stratified analyses of aggregated routine data from the euro-Peristat study. BJOG. 2016;123:559–68.
Operative Vaginal Birth. ACOG practice bulletin, number 219. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(4):e149–59.
Sandall J, Tribe RM, Avery L, Mola G, Visser GH, Homer CS, et al. Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children. Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1349–57.
Anonymous. Hospital episode statistics NHS maternity statistics–England. Health and Social Care Information Centre; 2015.
O’Mahony F, Hofmeyr GJ, Menon V. Choice of instruments for assisted vaginal delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;11:CD005455.
Friedman T, Eslick GD, Dietz HP. Delivery mode and the risk of levator muscle avulsion: a meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2019;30:901–7.
van Gruting MA, van Delft KWM, Sultan AH, Thakar R. The natural history of levator ani muscle avulsion 4 years following childbirth. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.23120.
Gurol-Urganci I, Cromwell D, Edozien L, Mahmood T, Adams E, Richmond D, et al. Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears among primiparous women in England between 2000 and 2012: time trends and risk factors. BJOG. 2013;120:1516–25.
van Bavel J, Hukkelhoven CWPM, de Vries C, Papatsonis DNM, de Vogel J, Roovers JWR, et al. The effectiveness of mediolateral episiotomy in preventing obstetric anal sphincter injuries during operative vaginal delivery: a ten-year analysis of a national registry. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(3):407–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3422-4.
Rortveit G, Daltveit AK, Hannestad YS, Hunskaar S, Norwegian EPINCONT Study. Urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery or cesarean section. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:900–7.
MacArthur C, Wilson D, Herbison P, Lancashire RJ, Hagen S, Toozs-Hobson P, et al. Urinary incontinence persisting after childbirth: extent, delivery history, and effects in a 12–year longitudinal cohort study. BJOG. 2016;123:1022–9.
Handa VL, Blomquist JL, McDermott KC, Friedman S, Muñoz A. Pelvic floor disorders after vaginal birth: effect of episiotomy, perineal laceration, and operative birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119(2 Pt 1):233–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e318240df4f.
MacArthur C, Wilson D, Herbison P, Lancashire R, Hagen S, Toozs-Hobson P, et al. On behalf of the ProLong study group. Faecal incontinence persisting after childbirth: a 12 year longitudinal study. BJOG. 2013;120:169–79.
Bols EM, Hendriks EJ, Berghmans BC, Baeten CG, Nijhuis JG, de Bie RA. A systematic review of etiological factors for postpartum fecal incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89(3):302–14. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016340903576004.
Jangö H, Langhoff-Roos J, Rosthøj S, et al. Long-term anal incontinence after obstetric anal sphincter injury—does grade of tear matter? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218:232.e1-10.
Mous M, Muller S, de Leeuw J. Long-term effects of anal sphincter rupture during vaginal delivery: faecal incontinence and sexual complaints. BJOG. 2008;115:234–8.
Glazener C, Elders A, MacArthur C, et al. Childbirth and prolapse: long-term associations with the symptoms and objective measurement of pelvic organ prolapse. BJOG. 2013;120(2):161–8.
Abdel-Fattah M, Familusi A, Fielding S, Ford J, Bhattacharya S. Primary and repeat surgical treatment for female pelvic organ prolapse and incontinence in parous women in the UK: a register linkage study. BMJ Open. 2011;1(2):e000206.
Leijonhufvud MD, Lundholm C, Cnattinguius S, et al. Risks of stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse surgery in relation to mode of child- birth. AmJ Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204:70e1–6.
Weemhoff M, Vergeldt T, Notten K, et al. Avulsion of puborectalis muscle and other risk factors for cystocele recurrence: a 2-year follow-up study. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23:65–71.
Murphy DJ, Strachan BK. Bahl R, on behalf of the Royal College of obstetricians Gynaecologists. Assisted vaginal birth. BJOG. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16092.
Gauthaman N, Henry D, Ster IC, Khunda A, Doumouchtsis SK. Kielland's forceps: does it increase the risk of anal sphincter injuries? An observational study. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(10):1525–32.
Seijmonsbergen-Schermers AE, van den Akker T, Rydahl E, Beeckman K, Bogaerts A, Binfa L, et al. Variations in use of childbirth interventions in 13 high-income countries: a multinational cross-sectional study. PLoS Med. 2020;17(5):e1003103. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.
Hull PM, Thomas K, Skinner E, Dawes A, Christensen P. Re: assisted vaginal birth: green-top guideline no. 26: Montgomery is missing from RCOG's assisted vaginal birth guideline. BJOG. 2020;127(10):1297–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16338.
Dickinson JE. Obstetric perineal trauma. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013 Feb;53(1):1–2. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.12060.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interests
Both authors have no disclosures with regard to this paper.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Leeuw, J.W., Daly, J.O. Forceps and vacuum: one goal, two entities. Int Urogynecol J 32, 2349–2352 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-04866-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-04866-z