Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Is coital incontinence a manifestation of urodynamic stress incontinence or detrusor overactivity?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Coital incontinence (CI) is an underreported symptom among sexually active women. It has been assumed that incontinence at penetration (CIAP) is due to urodynamic stress incontinence (USI), while coital incontinence at orgasm (CIAO) is thought to be due to detrusor overactivity (DO).

Methods

To evaluate demographic and urodynamic findings associated with coital incontinence (CI) and to confirm the hypotheses ‘CIAP is associated with USI’ and ‘CIAO is associated with DO we performed a retrospective study of 661 sexually active women attending a tertiary clinic between January 2017 and December 2019 for pelvic floor dysfunction. All patients filled in a standardized questionnaire and had a clinical examination and multichannel urodynamic testing. Women were asked if they experienced urine leakage during intercourse and the timing of such leakage.

Results

Of 661 sexually active women, one third (n = 220) reported coital incontinence. While 121 (18%) women experienced CIAP, 172 (26%) had CIAO and 76 (11.5%) suffered both. For women with pure USI, the prevalence of CIAP (61.7%) and CIAO (69.5%) was significantly higher than for women with pure DO, where only 12.3% had CIAP and 8.6% had CIAO. Factors significantly associated with CI were body mass index, mid-urethral closure pressure (MUCP) and abdominal leak point pressure (ALPP). When only women with pure USI or DO were included, USI remained associated with CI while DO was not.

Conclusions

CI is clearly associated with SUI and USI and is likely to share etio-pathogenetic mechanisms. CI seems to be a manifestation of USI, even when it occurs during orgasm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hilton P. Urinary incontinence during sexual intercourse: a common, but rarely volunteered, symptom. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1988;95(4):377–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Madhu C, Hashim H, Enki D. Yassin. M, drake M. coital incontinence: what can we learn from urodynamic assessment? Urology. 2015;85(5):1034–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Serati M, Salvatore S, Uccella S, et al. Female urinary incontinence during intercourse: a review on an understudied problem for women’s sexuality. J Sex Med. 2009;6:40–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Balzarro M, Rubilotta E, Mancini V, Trabacchin N, Oppezzi L, Li Marzi V, et al. Impact of overactive bladder-wet syndrome on female sexual function: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sex Med Rev. 2019;7(4):565–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zachariou A, Mamoulakis C, Filiponi M, et al. The effect of mirabegron, used for overactive bladder treatment, on female sexual function: a prospective controlled study. BMC Urol. 2018;18:61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Moran P, Dwyer P, Ziccone S. Urinary leakage during coitus in women. J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;19:286–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lau H, Huang W, Su T. Urinary leakage during sexual intercourse among women with incontinence: incidence and risk factors. PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0177075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bekker M, Beck J, Putter H, Venema P, Lycklama Nijeholt A, Pelger R, et al. Sexual function improvement following surgery for stress incontinence: the relevance of coital incontinence. J Sex Med. 2009;6:3208–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Verbeek M, Hayward L. Pelvic floor dysfunction and its effect on quality of sexual life. Sex Med Rev. 2019;7(4):559–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Espuna Pons M, Puig CM. Coital urinary incontinence: impact on quality of life as measured by the King's health questionnaire. Int Urogynecol J. 2008;19(5):621–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175(1):10–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rogers R, Coates K, Kammerer-Doak D, Khalsa S, Qualls C. A short form of the pelvic organ prolapse/urinary incontinence sexual questionnaire (PISQ-12). Int Urogynecol J. 2003;14(3):164–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ulrich D, Trutnovski G, Shek K, Dietz H. The ‘bother’ of prolapse. Neurourol Urodyn. 2013;32(6):864–5.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shek K, Yu H, Gillor M, Dietz H. Is a visual analogue scale inferior to the PFDI for assessing symptom bother of pelvic organ prolapse? Female Pelvic Med Reconstruct Surg. 2019;25(S1):S 132–3.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gray T, Li W, Campbell P, Jha S, Radley S. Evaluation of coital incontinence by electronic questionnaire: prevalence, associations and outcomes in women attending a urogynaecology clinic. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(7):969–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Serati M, Salvatore S, Uccella S, Cromi A, Khullar V, Cardozo L, et al. Urinary incontinence at orgasm: relation to detrusor overactivity and treatment efficacy. Eur Urol. 2008;54(4):911–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Serati M, Salvatore S, Cattoni E, Siesto G, Soligo M, Braga A, et al. Female urinary incontinence at orgasm: a possible marker of a more severe form of detrusor overactivity. Can ultrasound measurement of bladder wall thickness explain it? J Sex Med. 2011;8(6):1710–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. El-Azab A, Yousef H, Seifeldein G. Coital incontinence: relation to detrusor overactivity and stress incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011;30(4):520–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schoenfeld M, Fuermetz A, Muenster M. al. e. Sexuality in German urogynecological patients and healthy controls: is there a difference with respect to the diagnosis? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;170:567–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nilsson M, Lalos O, Lindkvist H. al. e. How do urinary incontinence and urgency affect women’s sexual life? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011;90:621–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jha S, Strelley K, Radley S. Incontinence during intercourse: myths unravelled. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23:633–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Su C, Sun B, Jiann B. Association of urinary incontinence and sexual function in women. Int J Urol. 2015;22:109–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Duralde E, Rowen T. Urinary incontinence and associated female sexual dysfunction. Sex Med Rev. 2017;5:470e85.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Hans Peter Dietz: Project conception, design and development; data acquisition; analysis and interpretation; drafting the manuscript, revising it critically for important intellectual content and final approval of the version to be published. Nishamini Subramaniam: Data acquisition; analysis and interpretation; drafting the manuscript, revising it critically for important intellectual content and final approval of the version to be published.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hans Peter Dietz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

HP Dietz has received unrestricted educational grants, lecture honoraria and consulting fees from GE Medical and Mindray. The other author has no conflict of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dietz, H.P., Subramaniam, N. Is coital incontinence a manifestation of urodynamic stress incontinence or detrusor overactivity?. Int Urogynecol J 33, 1175–1178 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-04809-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-04809-8

Keywords

Navigation