Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical utility of radiofrequency energy for female genitourinary dysfunction: past, present, and future

  • Review Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Radiofrequency (RF) energy has been delivered in a variety of methods to the vagina, bladder, and periurethral tissue to improve myriad genitourinary complaints. Currently, practitioners are promoting transvaginal RF treatments with a minimal understanding of the various platforms and data to support or refute their utilization. This review explores how various RF technologies create desired tissue effects, review the published literature reporting outcomes of various treatment regimes, and peer into potential future uses of this technology in urogynecology.

Methods

A comprehensive literature review was performed for articles pertaining to RF energy use in women for genitourinary complaints with regard to stress urinary incontinence (SUI), genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM), female sexual dysfunction (FSD), and overactive bladder (OAB).

Results

Radiofrequency energy devices heat tissues via direct or micro-needling applications with the goal of stimulating collagen remodeling, neovascularization, and potentially modulation of nerve function. By altering the approach and location of energy application, many new devices have been marketed for treatment of conditions such as SUI, GSM, FSD, and OAB. Available studies demonstrate promising efficacy and favorable safety; however, interpretation of studies is greatly limited by poor study quality and reporting.

Conclusions

Despite a lack of high-quality evidence for efficacy, safety, and durability in the literature, practitioners around the world continue to promote RF technology for a variety of genitourinary complaints. Currently, it appears that RF energy can potentially treat a variety of genitourinary conditions, but more robust data are needed to substantiate evidence-based use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Powis S, McLean K. IMMDS Press Release and NSH E/I Letter Dated 9 July 2018; 2018. http://www.england.nhs.uk/2018/07/provider-bulletin-11-July-2018

  2. Risacher SL, McDonald BC, Tallman EF, et al. Association between anticholinergic medication use and cognition, brain metabolism, and brain atrophy in cognitively normal older adults. JAMA Neurol. 2016;73(6):721–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Massarweh NN, Cosgriff N, Slakey DP. Electrosurgery: history, principles, and current and future uses. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;202(3):520–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dmochowski R, Dillon B. Radiofrequency for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women. Curr Urol Rep. 2009;10(5):369–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dayan E, Ramirez H, Westfall L, Theodorou S. Role of radiofrequency (Votiva, InMode) in pelvic floor restoration. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019;7(4):e2203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lalji S, Lozanova P. Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a monopolar nonablative radiofrequency device for the improvement of vulvo-vaginal laxity and urinary incontinence. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2017;16(2):230–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dayan E, Burns AJ, Rohrich RJ, Theodorou S. The use of radiofrequency in aesthetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020;8(8):e2861.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Vanaman Wilson MJ, Bolton J, Jones IT, Wu DC, Calame A, Goldman MP. Histologic and clinical changes in vulvovaginal tissue after treatment with a transcutaneous temperature-controlled radiofrequency device. Dermatol Surg. 2018;44(5):705–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Edelstein PS. A preclinical study of nonsurgical radiofrequency collagen remodeling for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Exp Rev Med Devices. 2006;3(6):743–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. FDA 510(k) Clearance Letter for SURx RF System; 2002. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf2/K020952.pdf

  11. Ross JW, Galen DI, Abbott K, et al. A prospective multisite study of radiofrequency bipolar energy for treatment of genuine stress incontinence. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2002;9(4):493–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fulmer BR, Sakamoto K, Turk TMT, et al. Acute and long-term outcomes of radio frequency bladder neck suspension. J Urol. 2002;167(1):141–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dmochowski RR, Avon M, Ross J, et al. Transvaginal radio frequency treatment of the endopelvic fascia: a prospective evaluation for the treatment of genuine stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2003;169(3):1028–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Buchsbaum GM, McConville J, Korni R, Duecy EE. Outcome of transvaginal radiofrequency for treatment of women with stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2007;18(3):263–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ismail SIMF. Radiofrequency remodelling of the endopelvic fascia is not an effective procedure for urodynamic stress incontinence in women. Int Urogynecol J. 2008;19(9):1205–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Miller D. Office management of stress incontinence: current and future role. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2007;50(2):376–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. FDA. FDA 510(k) Clearance Letter for Viveve System; 2016. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf16/K162547.pdf

  18. Allan BB, Bell S, Husarek K. A 12-month feasibility study to investigate the effectiveness of cryogen-cooled monopolar radiofrequency treatment for female stress urinary incontinence. Can Urol Assoc J. 2020;14(7):E313–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Leibaschoff G, Izasa PG, Cardona JL, Miklos JR, Moore RD. Transcutaneous temperature controlled radiofrequency (TTCRF) for the treatment of menopausal vaginal/genitourinary symptoms. Surg Technol Int. 2016;29:149–59.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. FDA. FDA 510(k) Clearance Letter for Novasys Medical Transurethral RF System; 2005. http://www.accessdata.fda.gove/cdrh_docs/pdf4/K042132.pdf

  21. Sotomayor M, Bernal GF. Transurethral delivery of radiofrequency energy for tissue micro-remodeling in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2003;14(6):373–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kang D, Han J, Neuberger MM, et al. Transurethral radiofrequency collagen denaturation for the treatment of women with urinary incontinence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(3):CD010217.

  23. Wright NT, Humphrey JD. Denaturation of collagen via heating: an irreversible rate process. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2002;4:109–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Appell RA, Juma S, Wells WG, et al. Transurethral radiofrequency energy collagen micro-remodeling for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2006;25(4):331–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Appell RA, Singh G, Klimberg IW, et al. Nonsurgical, radiofrequency collagen denaturation for stress urinary incontinence: retrospective 3-year evaluation. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2007;4(4):455–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sand PK, Owens GM, Black EJ, Anderson LH, Martinson MS. Cost effectiveness of radiofrequency microremodeling for stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(4):517–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Krychman M, Rowan CG, Allan BB, et al. Effect of single-treatment, surface-cooled radiofrequency therapy on vaginal laxity and female sexual function: the VIVEVE I randomized controlled trial. J Sex Med. 2017;14(2):215–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kamilos MF, Borrelli CL. New therapeutic option in genitourinary syndrome of menopause: pilot study using microablative fractional radiofrequency. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2017;15(4):445–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sarmento AC, Fernandes FS, Marconi C, et al. Impact of microablative fractional radiofrequency on the vaginal health, microbiota, and cellularity of postmenopausal women. Clinics. 2020;75:1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Reynolds W, Cohn J. Overactive bladder. In: Partin A, ed. Campbell-Walsh urology. 12th ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2021. p. 2637–49.e4.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Fugett J, Phillips L, Tobin E, et al. Selective bladder denervation for overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome: from concept to healing outcomes using the ovine model. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37(7):2097–105.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Rovner ES, Versi E, Le Mai T, Dmochowski RR, De Wachter S. One-year results with selective bladder denervation in women with refractory overactive bladder. Neurourol Urodyn. 2019;38(8):2178–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Shobeiri SA, Kerkhof MH, Minassian VA, Bazi T. IUGA committee opinion: laser-based vaginal devices for treatment of stress urinary incontinence, genitourinary syndrome of menopause, and vaginal laxity. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(3):371–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Alshiek J, Garcia B, Minassian VA, et al. Vaginal energy based devices—AUGS clinical consensus statement. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2020;26(5):287–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.M. Stachowicz: project Development, manuscript writing, and editing; M.L. Hoover: project development, manuscript writing, and editing; M.M. Karram: project development, manuscript writing and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne M. Stachowicz.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stachowicz, A.M., Hoover, M.L. & Karram, M.M. Clinical utility of radiofrequency energy for female genitourinary dysfunction: past, present, and future. Int Urogynecol J 32, 1345–1350 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-04735-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-04735-9

Keywords

Navigation