Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Patient-defined goals for the treatment of fecal incontinence: a qualitative analysis among women attending a urogynecology clinic

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Commentary to this article was published on 09 January 2021

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Fecal incontinence treatment goals are understudied and are not described for women presenting to care. Our objective was to explore patient-reported goals for fecal incontinence management among women presenting for care at a pelvic floor disorders clinic and develop a conceptual framework that captures the range of desired treatment outcomes.

Methods

A qualitative analysis of patient-reported goals for women with fecal incontinence attending a pelvic floor disorders clinic from October 2017–November 2019 was conducted. A team-based approach was used to identify themes and emerging concepts and develop a conceptual framework.

Results

One hundred patients met the inclusion criteria. Mean age was 58 ± 14 years; 67% were White and 46% non-Hispanic. Seventy-nine percent of women had diagnosis(es) of prolapse, urinary complaints, or another pelvic floor disorder. From 230 unique goals identified, five thematic categories emerged: Emotional Status, Functional Status, Concurrent Pelvic Floor Disorders, Care Seeking, and Treatment Aspirations. Thematic domains not previously represented in other qualitative work include patients’ focus on treatment for global pelvic health rather than solely on fecal incontinence and treatment aspirations ranging from improvement to cure. Our model captures the close relationship between all pelvic floor disorders and emotion, which in return affects all facets of care.

Conclusions

Women with fecal incontinence report a range of treatment goals from improvement to complete resolution of symptoms. Focusing treatment on patient goals by addressing global pelvic health and negotiating realistic treatment outcomes may improve care in this population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brown HW, Wexner SD, Segall MM, Brezoczky KL, Lukacz ES. Quality of life impact in women with accidental bowel leakage. Int J Clin Pract. 2012;66(11):1109–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Varma MG, Brown JS, Creasman JM, Thom DH, Van Den Eeden SK, Beattie MS, et al. Group RRfISaKRR: fecal incontinence in females older than aged 40 years: who is at risk? Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49(6):841–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sung VW, Rogers RG, Bann CM, Arya L, Barber MD, Lowder J, et al. Symptom outcomes important to women with anal incontinence: a conceptual framework. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(5):1023–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Boreham MK, Richter HE, Kenton KS, Nager CW, Gregory WT, Aronson MP, et al. Anal incontinence in women presenting for gynecologic care: prevalence, risk factors, and impact upon quality of life. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(5):1637–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gordon D, Groutz A, Goldman G, Avni A, Wolf Y, Lessing JB, et al. Anal incontinence: prevalence among female patients attending a urogynecologic clinic. Neurourol Urodyn. 1999;18(3):199–204.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Saldana Ruiz N, Kaiser AM. Fecal incontinence - challenges and solutions. World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23(1):11–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rortveit G, Subak LL, Thom DH, Creasman JM, Vittinghoff E, Van Den Eeden SK, et al. Urinary incontinence, fecal incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in a population-based, racially diverse cohort: prevalence and risk factors. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2010;16(5):278–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kapoor DS, Thakar R, Sultan AH. Combined urinary and faecal incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2005;16(4):321–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Elkadry EA, Kenton KS, FitzGerald MP, Shott S, Brubaker L. Patient-selected goals: a new perspective on surgical outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(6):1551–7. discussion 1557-1558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Thorneloe RJ, Bundy C, Griffiths CE, Ashcroft DM, Cordingley L. Nonadherence to psoriasis medication as an outcome of limited coping resources and conflicting goals: findings from a qualitative interview study with people with psoriasis. Br J Dermatol. 2017;176(3):667–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Manthey A, Bliss DZ, Savik K, Lowry A, Whitebird R. Goals of fecal incontinence management identified by community-living incontinent adults. West J Nurs Res. 2010;32(5):644–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Earp JA, Ennett ST. Conceptual models for health education research and practice. Health Educ Res. 1991;6(2):163–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Komesu YM, Rogers RG, Rode MA, Craig EC, Schrader RM, Gallegos KA, et al. Patient-selected goal attainment for pessary wearers: what is the clinical relevance? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198(5):577.e571–5.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stemler S. An overview of content analysis. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2001;7(17). https://doi.org/10.7275/z6fm-2e34.

  15. Krueger R. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research (4th edition). Thousand Aoks, CA: Sage Publications; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dedoose Software. Los Angeles, California; 2018. https://www.dedoose.com.

  17. Choo MS, Doo CK, Lee KS. Satisfaction with tolterodine: assessing symptom-specific patient-reported goal achievement in the treatment of overactive bladder in female patients (STARGATE study). Int J Clin Pract. 2008;62(2):191–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hullfish KL, Bovbjerg VE, Gibson J, Steers WD. Patient-centered goals for pelvic floor dysfunction surgery: what is success, and is it achieved? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187(1):88–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lacima G, Espuña M, Pera M, Puig-Clota M, Quintó L, García-Valdecasas JC. Clinical, urodynamic, and manometric findings in women with combined fecal and urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21(5):464–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Soligo M, Salvatore S, Milani R, Lalia M, Malberti S, Digesu GA, et al. Double incontinence in urogynecologic practice: a new insight. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(2):438–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Women’s Health, University of Texas Austin Dell Medical School, Medical Park Tower, 1301 W. 38th St., Suite 705, Austin, TX, 78705, USA

    Gabriela E. Halder, Lauren Caldwell, Daksha Bilagi, Maura R. Ronquillo & Amanda B. White

  2. Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA

    Gena G. Dunivan

  3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, USA

    Rebecca G. Rogers

Authors
  1. Gabriela E. Halder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lauren Caldwell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gena G. Dunivan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Daksha Bilagi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Maura R. Ronquillo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Amanda B. White
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Rebecca G. Rogers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriela E. Halder.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

GE Halder: Nothing to disclose.

L Caldwell: Nothing to disclose.

GG Dunivan: Nothing to disclose.

D Bilagi: Nothing to disclose.

MR Ronquillo: Nothing to disclose.

AB White: Nothing to disclose.

RG Rogers: Royalties from Uptodate, stipend and travel from ABOG and IUGA, travel and honorarium from ACOG.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Halder, G.E., Caldwell, L., Dunivan, G.G. et al. Patient-defined goals for the treatment of fecal incontinence: a qualitative analysis among women attending a urogynecology clinic. Int Urogynecol J 32, 1453–1458 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04579-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04579-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation