Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Laparoscopic cervicopexy for correction of apical genital prolapse in 10 steps: a pilot study

  • IUJ Video
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Surgical repair of pelvic organ prolapse is one of the most frequent gynecological procedures, and its frequency is expected to increase as the population is gradually aging. Mesh use in urogynecological surgery should be limited because of important and life-treating complications. Sacral mesh-less and lateral procedures have been described as safe and effective to treat apical compartment prolapse. In this video, we describe a new laparoscopic mesh-less cervicopexy in women with symptomatic uterovaginal prolapse who did not desire uterine preservation.

Methods

Eleven women with symptomatic uterovaginal prolapse [stage 2 or higher according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantitative (POP-Q) classification system] underwent laparoscopic mesh-less cervicopexy to the sacrum and transverse fascia between May 2018 and June 2019. We performed application of the right uterosacral ligament starting from the sacrum and two semicontinous sutures including the transverse fascia, round ligament, prevescical peritoneum, pubocervical fascia and cervix that were subsequently knotted.

Results

At 6-month follow-up, the objective success rate for apical prolapse (POP-Q score C > −1) was 90.9% (10/11 women). Only one woman presented stage 3 apical prolapse recurrence with vaginal buldge.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic mesh-less cervicopexy for uterovaginal prolapse seems to be a feasible surgical technique at 6-month follow-up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, et al. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:501–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00058-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mahran MA, Herath RP, Sayed AT, Oligbo N. Laparoscopic management of genital prolapse. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011;283:1015–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1822-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, et al. Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;10:CD012376. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012376.www.cochranelibrary.com.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Veit-Rubin N, Dubuisson JB, Gayet-Ageron A, et al. Patient satisfaction after laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh for pelvic organ prolapse: outcome report of a continuous series of 417 patients. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28:1685–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3327-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mereu L, Dalpra F, Terreno E, et al. Mini-laparoscopic repair of apical pelvic organ prolapse (POP) by lateral suspension with mesh. Facts, views Vis ObGyn. 2018;10:139–45.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Szymczak P, Grzybowska ME, Wydra DG. Comparison of laparoscopic techniques for apical organ prolapse repair – a systematic review of the literature. Neurourol Urodyn. 2019;38:2031–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.24115.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Seracchioli R, Raimondo D, Arena A, et al. Laparoscopic mesh-less cervicosacropexy for uterovaginal prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2018;24:399–403. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000464.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ercoli A, Campagna G, Delmas V, et al. Anatomical insights into sacrocolpopexy for multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016;35:813–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22806.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:10–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70243-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mueller MG, Jacobs KM, Mueller ER, et al. Outcomes in 450 women after minimally invasive abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016;22:267–71. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000269.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bajzak KI, Green IC, Jacobs VR, et al. AAGL practice report: practice guidelines for laparoscopic subtotal/supracervical hysterectomy (LSH). J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21:9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2013.08.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rogers RG, Pauls RN, Thakar R, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for the assessment of sexual health of women with pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37:1220–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

C.P. First Surgeon, Reviewing; A.A. Writing, Original draft preparation; P.S. Conceptualization, Editing; D.R. Writing, Editing; R.S. Supervision, Editing

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paolo Salucci.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this video article and any accompanying images.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

(MP4 97483 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Paolo, C., Alessandro, A., Salucci, P. et al. Laparoscopic cervicopexy for correction of apical genital prolapse in 10 steps: a pilot study. Int Urogynecol J 32, 1313–1316 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04536-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04536-6

Keywords

Navigation