Skip to main content

The usual suspect: cross-sectional study of fundal pressure at second stage of delivery and the association with pelvic floor damage

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Uterine fundal pressure is applied to accelerate birth by increasing the expulsive force of the uterus in the second stage of delivery. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of using uterine fundal pressure during the second stage of delivery on the rate of pelvic floor damage among primiparous women using three-dimensional transperineal ultrasonography.

Methods

The women were divided into two groups: the fundal pressure group included women where the fundal pressure maneuver was applied (n = 39); the control group included women who delivered spontaneously without fundal pressure (n = 47). 3D-TPU was performed within 48 h of delivery, and LAM biometry, LAM defect and loss of tenting were determined.

Results

Anteroposterior hiatal dimensions on resting, maximal Valsalva and maximal PFMC were found to be higher in the fundal pressure group (p < 0.0001, p = 0.008, p = 0.007, respectively). The mean hiatal area at rest was larger in the fundal pressure group than in the control group (p = 0.04). The rate of LAM defect was significantly higher in the fundal pressure group (p = 0.001). The rate of loss of tenting was significantly higher in the fundal pressure group (p < 0.0001). According to multivariate regression models, the fundal pressure was the only independent factor associated with LAM defect (OR = 5.63; 95% CI = 12.01–15.74) and loss of tenting (OR = 8.74; 95% CI = 2.89–26.43).

Conclusions

Fundal pressure during the second stage of delivery is associated with a higher risk of LAM defect and loss of anterior vaginal wall support.

Clinical Trial Registration

NCT03752879

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. 1.

    WHO Reproductive Health Library. WHO recommendation on fundal pressure to facilitate childbirth. Geneva (Switzerland): The WHO Reproductive Health Library. World Health Organization; 2018.

  2. 2.

    Dietz HP. Pelvic floor trauma following vaginal delivery. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2006;18:528–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Friedman S, Blomquist JL, Nugent JM, et al. Pelvic muscle strength after childbirth. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;20:1021–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Lien KC, Mooney B, DeLancey JOL, Ashton-Miller JA. Levator ani muscle stretch induced by simulated vaginal birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103:31–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Shek K, Dietz HP. Intrapartum risk factors for levator trauma. BJOG. 2010;117:1485–92.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Simpson KR, Knox GE. Fundal pressure during the second stage of labor. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2001;26:64–70. quiz 71.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Zanconato G, Cavaliere E, Cherubini G, Bortolami O, Mantovani E, Iacovella C, Franchi M. Fundal pressure (Kristeller maneuver) during labor in current obstetric practice: assessment of prevalence and feto-maternal effects. Minerva Ginecol 2014;66:239–241.

  8. 8.

    Pinar S, Karaçam Z. Applying fundal pressure in the second stage of labour and its impact on mother and infant health. Health Care Women Int. 2018;39:110–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Buhimschi CS, Buhimschi IA, Malinow AM, Kopelman JN, Weiner CP. The effect of fundal pressure maneuver on intrauterine pressure in the second stage of labor. BJOG. 2002;109:520–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Merhi ZO, Awonuga AO. The role of uterine fundal pressure in the management of the second stage of labor: a reappraisal. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2005;60:599–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Aydin S, Tuncel MA, Aydin CA, Ark C. Do we protect the pelvic floor with non-elective caesarean? A study of 3D/4D pelvic floor ultrasound immediately after delivery. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014;4:1037–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Dietz HP, Shek C, De Leon J, Steensma AB. Ballooning of the levator hiatus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;31:676–80.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Dietz HP, Steensma AB, Hastings R. Three-dimensional ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor: the effect of parturition on paravaginal support structures. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;21:589–95.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Dietz HP. Quantification of major morphological abnormalities of the levator ani. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;29:329–34.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Dietz HP, Bernardo MJ, Kirby A, Shek KL. Minimal criteria for the diagnosis of avulsion of the puborectalis muscle by tomographic ultrasound. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22:699–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Memon HU, Blomquist JL, Dietz HP, Pierce CB, Weinstein MM, Handa VL. Comparison of levator ani muscle avulsion injury after forceps and vacuum-assisted vaginal childbirth. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125:1080–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Valsky DV, Lipschuetz M, Bord A, Eldar I, Messing B, Hochner- Celnikier D, et al. Fetal head circumference and length of second stage of labour are risk factors for levator ani muscle injury, diagnosed by 3-dimensional transperineal ultrasound in primiparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201:91.e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Albrich SB, Laterza RM, Skala C, Salvatore S, Koelbl H, Naumann G. Impact of mode of delivery on levator morphology: a prospective observational study with three-dimensional ultrasound early in the postpartum period. BJOG. 2012;119:51–60.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Youssef A, Salsi G, Cataneo I, Pacella G, Azzarone C, Paganotto MC. Fundal pressure in second stage of labor (Kristeller maneuver) is associated with increased risk of levator ani muscle avulsion. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53:95–100.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Aydın S, Aydın ÇA. Evaluation of labor-related pelvic floor changes 3 months after delivery: a 3D transperineal ultrasound study. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26:1827–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Delancey JO, Morgan DM, Fenner DE, et al. Comparison of levator ani muscle defects and function in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:295–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Chan SS, Cheung RY, YiuKW LLL, Chung TK. Effect of levator ani muscle injury on primiparous women during the first year after childbirth. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(10):1381–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Dietz HP, Simpson JM. Levator trauma is associated with pelvic organ prolapse. BJOG. 2008;115:979–84.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Arenholt LTS, Pedersen BG, Glavind K, Glavind-Kristensen M, DeLancey JOL. Paravaginal defect: anatomy, clinical findings, and imaging. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28:661–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Dietz HP, Pang S, Korda A, Benness C. Paravaginal defects: a comparison of clinical examination and 2D/3D ultrasound imaging. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;45:187–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Cassadó-Garriga J, Wong V, Shek K, Dietz HP. Can we identify changes in fascial paravaginal supports after childbirth? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;55:70–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Abdool Z, Shek KL, Dietz HP. The effect of levator avulsion on hiatal dimensions and function. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201:89.e1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    El-Haieg DO, Madkour NM, Basha MAA, Ahmad RA, Sadek SM, Al-Molla RM. Magnetic resonance imaging and 3-dimensional transperineal ultrasound evaluation of pelvic floor dysfunction in symptomatic women: a prospective comparative study. Ultrasonography. 2019;38:355–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Handa VL, Blomquist JL, Roem J, Muñoz A, Dietz HP. Levator morphology and strength after obstetric avulsion of the Levator Ani muscle. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2020;26:56–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Hofmeyr GJ, Vogel JP, Cuthbert A, Singata M. Fundal pressure during the second stage of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;3:CD006067.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Bezmialem Vakif University and the participants for their support of this study.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Takmaz T: Project development, Data collection, Manuscript writing.

Aydın S: Project development, Data collection, Investigation, Manuscript writing, Data analysis.

Gorchieva İ: Data analysis, Data collection, Investigation.

Gökmen Karasu A. F: Data collection, Investigation, Manuscript writing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Serdar Aydın.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None.

Fınancıal dısclaımer

The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this paper.

Consent

All participants provided informed consent before enrollment.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Takmaz, T., Aydın, S., Gorchiyeva, İ. et al. The usual suspect: cross-sectional study of fundal pressure at second stage of delivery and the association with pelvic floor damage. Int Urogynecol J 32, 1917–1924 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04523-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Levator ani muscle
  • Fundal pressure pelvic floor
  • Transperineal ultrasound
  • Vaginal delivery