Skip to main content

Is vaginal flatus related to pelvic floor functional anatomy?

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Vaginal flatus is an embarrassing condition that can impair women’s quality of life. The underlying pathophysiology is unclear. We aimed to evaluate the association between vaginal flatus and pelvic floor anatomy.

Methods

Retrospective observational study on women seen in a tertiary urogynaecological service. All had undergone a standardised interview, clinical examination and four-dimensional transperineal ultrasound. Offline analysis of volume data was performed blinded against clinical data.

Results

Datasets of 570 women were analysed. Five hundred twelve (90%) were vaginally parous. Vaginal flatus was reported by 190 (33%). Mean bother score was 4.2 (SD 3.4, range 0–10). One hundred eighty-five reported frequency of vaginal flatus: it occurred < once a month in 25 (14%), once a month in 70 (38%), once a week in 47 (25%), once daily in 28 (15%) and > once daily in 15 (8%). One hundred two women identified the following precipitating factors: intercourse in 72 (71%), postural change in 22 (22%) and physical activities in 9 (9%). Vaginal birth, central and posterior compartment prolapse, anal incontinence, higher levator resting tone and younger age were associated with vaginal flatus. The latter was moderately correlated with symptom bother (correlation coefficient − 0.21).

Conclusions

Vaginal flatus is a prevalent and bothersome condition affecting one-third of our study population. The condition is associated with pelvic floor functional anatomy. A higher resting tone may confer a higher resistance against which trapped air is expelled during physical activities. Younger age was moderately correlated with symptom bother.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Sultan AH, Monga A, Lee J, Emmanuel A, Norton C, Santoro G, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female anorectal dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(1):5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3140-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Neels H, Mortiers X, de Graaf S, Tjalma WAA, De Wachter S, Vermandel A. Vaginal wind: a literature review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;214:97–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.04.033.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Veisi F, Rezavand N, Zangeneh M, Malekkhosravi S, Rezaei M. Vaginal flatus and the associated risk factors in Iranian women: a main research article. ISRN Obstet Gynecol. 2012;2012:802648. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/802648.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Slieker-ten Hove MC, Pool-Goudzwaard AL, Eijkemans MJ, Steegers-Theunissen RP, Burger CW, Vierhout ME. Vaginal noise: prevalence, bother and risk factors in a general female population aged 45-85 years. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009;20(8):905–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0875-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Miranne JM, Marek TM, Mete M, Iglesia CB. Prevalence and resolution of auditory passage of vaginal air in women with pelvic floor disorders. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(1):136–43. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000000921.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lonnee-Hoffmann RA, Salvesen O, Morkved S, Schei B. Self-reported pelvic organ prolapse surgery, prevalence, and nonobstetric risk factors: findings from the Nord Trondelag health study. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(3):407–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2509-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Krissi H, Medina C, Stanton SL. Vaginal wind - a new pelvic symptom. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2003;14(6):399–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-003-1086-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lonnee-Hoffmann RA, Salvesen O, Morkved S, Schei B. Male sexual function and pelvic floor surgery of their female partner: a one-year follow-up study. Post Reprod Health. 2014;20(2):55–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754045314524950.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jung SA, Pretorius DH, Padda BS, Weinstein MM, Nager CW, den Boer DJ, et al. Vaginal high-pressure zone assessed by dynamic 3-dimensional ultrasound images of the pelvic floor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(1):52 e51–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2007.04.026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dietz HP, Shek KL. The quantification of levator muscle resting tone by digital assessment. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19(11):1489–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-008-0682-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175(1):10–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70243-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dietz HP, Mann KP. What is clinically relevant prolapse? An attempt at defining cutoffs for the clinical assessment of pelvic organ descent. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(4):451–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-013-2307-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dietz HP. Ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor. Part II: three-dimensional or volume imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;23(6):615–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.1072.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dietz HP, Haylen BT, Broome J. Ultrasound in the quantification of female pelvic organ prolapse. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;18(5):511–4. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00494.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dietz HP, Lekskulchai O. Ultrasound assessment of pelvic organ prolapse: the relationship between prolapse severity and symptoms. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;29(6):688–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.4024.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shek KL, Dietz HP. What is abnormal uterine descent on translabial ultrasound? Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(12):1783–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2792-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dietz HP, Wong V, Shek KL. A simplified method for determining hiatal biometry. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;51(6):540–3. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828X.2011.01352.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dietz HP, Bernardo MJ, Kirby A, Shek KL. Minimal criteria for the diagnosis of avulsion of the puborectalis muscle by tomographic ultrasound. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(6):699–704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-010-1329-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cartwright R, Brown H, Rizk D. Patient reported outcome measures after incontinence and prolapse surgery: are the pictures painted by the ICIQ and PGI-I accurate? Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(4):507–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2929-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Ulrich D, Guzman Rojas R, Dietz HP, Mann K, Trutnovsky G. Use of a visual analog scale for evaluation of bother from pelvic organ prolapse. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;43(6):693–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.13222.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Allahdin S. Flatus vaginalis a distressing symptom. Int J Color Dis. 2011;26(11):1493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-011-1143-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Attapattu JA. Garrulitas vulvae. A report of six cases. J Reprod Med. 1995;40(3):235–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Trutnovsky G, Robledo KP, Shek KL, Dietz HP. Definition of apical descent in women with and without previous hysterectomy: a retrospective analysis. PLoS One. 2019;14(3):e0213617. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213617.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

H Neels: Project development, data collection, data management, manuscript writing/editing.

S Pacquée: Project development, data management, manuscript writing/editing.

KL Shek: Project development, data collection and management, statistical analysis, manuscript writing/editing.

M Gillor: Project development, data management, statistical analysis, manuscript writing/editing.

J Caudwell-Hall: Project development, manuscript writing/editing.

HP Dietz: Project development, data management, statistical analysis, manuscript writing/editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hedwig Neels.

Ethics declarations

Financial disclaimers/conflicts of interest

Neels: Received the IUGA observership grant for allied health professionals 2019.

Pacquée: No conflicts of interest to declare.

Shek: Received lecture honoraria and travel assistance from GE Medical.

Gillor: No conflicts of interest to declare.

Caudwell-Hall: No conflicts of interest to declare.

Dietz: Received lecture honoraria and travel assistance from GE Medical.

Presentation: AUGS/IUGA Joint Meeting, September 24–28, 2019, Nashville, TN.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Neels, H., Pacquée, S., Shek, KL. et al. Is vaginal flatus related to pelvic floor functional anatomy?. Int Urogynecol J 31, 2551–2555 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04371-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04371-9

Keywords

  • Vaginal flatus
  • Pelvic floor anatomy
  • Levator ani
  • Vaginal wind
  • Transperineal ultrasound
  • Pelvic organ prolapse