Skip to main content
Log in

Author reply to the commentary on: Is endoanal, introital or transperineal ultrasound diagnosis of sphincter defects more strongly associated with anal incontinence?

  • Author Response (Invitation)
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The Original Article was published on 24 May 2020

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Taithongchai A, van Gruting IMA, Volloyhaug I, Arendsen LP, Sultan AH, Thakar R. Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of 3 ultrasound modalities for diagnosing obstetric anal sphincter injuries. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;221(2):134.e131–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.04.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rao SS. Pathophysiology of adult fecal incontinence. Gastroenterology. 2004;126(1 Suppl 1):S14–22. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2003.10.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dietz HP. Exoanal imaging of the anal sphincters. J Ultrasound Med. 2018;37(1):263–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.14246.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Guzman Rojas RA, Kamisan Atan I, Shek KL, Dietz HP. Anal sphincter trauma and anal incontinence in urogynecological patients. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46(3):363–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.14845.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Abdool Z, Sultan AH, Thakar R. Ultrasound imaging of the anal sphincter complex: a review. Br J Radiol. 2012;85(1015):865–75. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/27314678.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Smilen SW, Porges RF, Avizova E. Simple ultrasound evaluation of the anal sphincter in female patients using a transvaginal transducer. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;25(2):177–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.1827.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Weinstein MM, Pretorius DH, Jung SA, Nager CW, Mittal RK. Transperineal three-dimensional ultrasound imaging for detection of anatomic defects in the anal sphincter complex muscles. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7(2):205–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2008.08.019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ros C, Martinez-Franco E, Wozniak MM, Cassado J, Santoro GA, Elias N, et al. Postpartum two- and three-dimensional ultrasound evaluation of anal sphincter complex in women with obstetric anal sphincter injury. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;49(4):508–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.15924.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Talbot IC, Nicholls RJ, Bartram CI. Anal endosonography for identifying external sphincter defects confirmed histologically. Br J Surg. 1994;81(3):463–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800810349.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ingrid Volløyhaug.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Volløyhaug, I., Taithongchai, A., Arendsen, L. et al. Author reply to the commentary on: Is endoanal, introital or transperineal ultrasound diagnosis of sphincter defects more strongly associated with anal incontinence?. Int Urogynecol J 31, 1491–1492 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04370-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04370-w

Navigation