Skip to main content
Log in

Management of recurrent pelvic organ prolapse after sacrocolpopexy. A video case series

  • IUJ Video
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The aim of this video case series is to demonstrate our experience with the surgical management of recurrent pelvic organ prolapse after sacrocolpopexy.

Methods

This is a series of seven patients who developed recurrent pelvic organ prolapse stage 2 or greater after sacrocolpopexy. The video shows short clips on the individualized surgical management using a laparoscopic approach.

Conclusion

The surgical management of patients with recurrent pelvic organ prolapse poses a great challenge. In our cases the laparoscopic approach gave us the opportunity to diagnose the reason for surgical failure, to optimally restore the anatomy and function of the pelvic floor, and to limit the morbidity that is often seen in repeat surgery. Laparoscopic revision of sacrocolpopexy for recurrent pelvic organ prolapse is feasible but needs to be individualized. As the number of cases is limited, and available evidence is scarce, we recommend the use of a registry to prospectively follow up these patients and identify best practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abbreviations

LSCP:

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy

SCP:

Sacrocolpopexy

POP:

Pelvic organ prolapse

ALL:

Anterior longitudinal ligament

TAH:

Total abdominal hysterectomy

TLH:

Total laparoscopic hysterectomy

References

  1. Nezhat CH, Nezhat F, Nezhat C. Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;84(5):885–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Coolen AWM, Bui BN, Dietz V, Wang R, van Montfoort APA, Mol BWJ, et al. The treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(12):1767–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3493-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Pacquée SNK, Claerhout F, Werbrouck E, Veldman J, Dʼhoore A, Wyndaele J, et al. Long-term assessment of a prospective cohort of patients undergoing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;134(2):323–32. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003380.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Maher C, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, Haya N, Brown J. (2016) Surgery for women with anterior compartment prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Nov 30;11:CD004014.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Esther Ruess.

Ethics declarations

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patients for publication of this video article and any accompanying images.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(M4V 95591 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ruess, E., Roovers, JP. & Jeffery, S. Management of recurrent pelvic organ prolapse after sacrocolpopexy. A video case series. Int Urogynecol J 31, 1483–1485 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-04222-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-04222-2

Navigation