Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Outcomes of urodynamic mixed urinary incontinence and urodynamic stress incontinence with urgency after mid-urethral sling surgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Mixed urinary incontinence (MUI) is defined as symptomatic complaint of involuntary leakage associated with urgency and also with exertion, effort, sneezing or coughing. The paucity of research, especially on the surgical management of MUI, limits its best management.

Methods

This is a retrospective study to determine the outcomes of mixed urinary incontinence after mid-urethral sling surgery with two groups, urodynamic stress incontinence (USI) with urgency and urodynamic mixed urinary incontinence (MUI-UD; USI and detrusor overactivity [DO]).

Results

Ninety women (USI + urgency group) with preoperative USI and urgency and no demonstrable DO/DOI attained an objective cure of 82.2%, whereas the remaining 67 (MUI-UD group) women with both USI and DO/DOI were reported to have an objective cure of only 55.2%. Subjective cures were 81.1% and 53.7% respectively. The type of incontinence surgery does not affect postoperative outcomes in either of the groups. Demographic factors identified to have a significant negative effect on cure rates were postmenopausal status (p = 0.005), prior hysterectomy (p = 0.028), pre-operative smaller blafdder capacity (p = 0.001), and a larger volume of pre-operative pad test (p = 0.028). A lower mid-urethral closure pressure (MUCP) was significant with post-operative failure of treatment with MUI-UD group (68.8 ± 36.2 cmH2O vs 51.9 ± 24.7 cmH2O; p = 0.033).

Conclusions

Although there is evidence for a good cure of the stress component of MUI, urodynamic investigation with its findings prior to management of MUI could have greater implications for selective patient centered counseling. Presence of DO or DOI on urodynamics resulted in poorer objective and subjective outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, et al. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21(2):167–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Khullar V, Cardozo L, Dmochowski R. Mixed incontinence: current evidence and future perspectives. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(4):618–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wu SP, Lo TS, Pue LB, et al. Outcome after conservative management for mixed urinary incontinence. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015;41(2):269–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jain P, Jirschele K, Botros SM, Latthe PM. Effectiveness of midurethral slings in mixed urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(8):923–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Minassian VA, Yan XS, Pitcavage J, Stewart WF. Mixed incontinence masked as stress induced urgency urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2016;196(4):1190–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(1):5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lo TS, Chua S, Kao CC, Uy-Patrimonio MC, Ibrahim R, Tan YL. Five-year outcome of MiniArc single-incision sling used in the treatment of primary urodynamic stress incontinence. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25:116–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lo TS, Shailaja N, Chua S, Tseng LH, Kao CC, Wu MP. Evaluation of clinical outcome and risk factors for failure of single-incision midurethral short tape procedure (Solyx tape) for stress urinary incontinence. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;26:688–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2018.07.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lo TS, Jaili SB, Tan YL, Wu PY. A 5-year follow-up study on Monarc transobturator tape for surgical treatment of primary stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27:1653–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lo TS, Wang AC, Horng SG, Liang CC, Soong YK. Ultrasonographic and urodynamic evaluation after tension free vagina tape procedure (TVT). Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80:65–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Su TH, Lau HH. Validation of a Chinese version of the short form of the pelvic organ prolapse/urinary incontinence sexual questionnaire. J Sex Med. 2010;7(12):3940–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kammerer-Doak D, Rizk DE, Sorinola O, Agur W, Ismail S, Bazi T. Mixed urinary incontinence: International Urogynecological Association research and development committee opinion. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(10):1303–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Balachandran A, Duckett J. Does the diagnosis of detrusor overactivity affect the long-term prognosis of patients treated with a retropubic midurethral sling? Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(12):1913–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Salinas-Casado J, Mendez-Rubio S, Pesquera-Ortega L, et al. Usefulness of urodynamics in the treatment of mixed urinary incontinence in women with suburethral slings. Arch Esp Urol. 2016;69(4):172–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gleason JL, Parden AM, Jauk V, Ballard A, Sung V, Richter HE. Outcomes of midurethral sling procedures in women with mixed urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(5):715–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gamble TL, Botros SM, Beaumont JL, et al. Predictors of persistent detrusor overactivity after transvaginal sling procedures. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(6):696.e1-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Paick JS, Oh SJ, Kim SW, Ku JH. Tension-free vaginal tape, suprapubic arc sling, and transobturator tape in the treatment of mixed urinary incontinence in women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19(1):123–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Petros PE. Mixed urinary incontinence—time to uncouple urgency from stress? Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(8):919–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Brubaker L, Stoddard A, Richter H, et al. Mixed incontinence: comparing definitions in women having stress incontinence surgery. Neurourol Urodyn. 2009;28(4):268–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Natale F, Illiano E, La Penna C, Balsamo R, Costantini E. Mixed urinary incontinence: a prospective study on the effect of trans-obturator mid-urethral sling. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;221:64–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Engen M, Svenningsen R, Schiotz HA, Kulseng-Hanssen S. Mid-urethral slings in young, middle-aged, and older women. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37(8):2578–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TSL: protocol/project development, data collection, data analysis, manuscript editing; YLT: data analysis, manuscript writing, manuscript editing; LBP: data analysis, manuscript editing; SC: data analysis, manuscript editing; MPW: data analysis, manuscript editing; WCH: data collection, data analysis.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tsia-Shu Lo.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lo, TS., Tan, Y.L., Pue, L.B. et al. Outcomes of urodynamic mixed urinary incontinence and urodynamic stress incontinence with urgency after mid-urethral sling surgery. Int Urogynecol J 31, 1949–1957 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-04213-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-04213-3

Keywords

Navigation