Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

LeFort partial colpocleisis: tips and technique

  • IUJ Video
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

We present a video describing the technical considerations for performing a LeFort colpocleisis.

Methods

A 79-year-old woman presented with a symptomatic vaginal bulge. She was not sexually active, and had no desire to maintain the vaginal canal. Her history was significant for aortic valve replacement, chronic anticoagulation, and a cardiac pacemaker. She had uterine procidentia, with occult stress urinary incontinence. After discussing options, she elected to undergo LeFort colpocleisis. Following sharp endometrial curettage, hydro-dissection was performed with lidocaine and epinephrine. Rectangular patches of vaginal epithelium were excised anteriorly and posteriorly, and the proximal margins were re-approximated, inverting the cervix. Following this, the lateral margins were re-approximated to create lateral channels. The anterior and posterior rectangles were then plicated, reducing the prolapse. The vaginal incision was closed transversely. A retropubic, synthetic, mid-urethral sling was placed, and an aggressive posterior colpoperineorrhaphy was performed.

Results

Her postoperative course was uncomplicated. At her 6-week follow-up she had no recurrent prolapse, denied stress incontinence, and was voiding without difficulty.

Conclusions

Important tips for LeFort colpocleisis include ruling out underlying malignancy, using lidocaine with epinephrine for hydrodissection, creating adequate lateral channels, closure in multiple layers with excellent hemostasis, and an aggressive posterior repair.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Wu JM, Vaughan CP, Goode PS, et al. Prevalence and trends of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in U.S. women. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(1):141–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Boyles SH, Weber AM, Meyn L. Procedures for pelvic organ prolapse in the United States, 1979-1997. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188(1):108–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Crisp CC, Book NM, Smith AL, et al. Body image, regret, and satisfaction following colpocleisis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209(5):473 e1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fitzgerald MP, Richter HE, Bradley CS, et al. Pelvic support, pelvic symptoms, and patient satisfaction after colpocleisis. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19(12):1603–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. FitzGerald MP, Richter HE, Siddique S, Thompson P, Zyczynski H; Ann Weber for the Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Colpocleisis: a review. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006;17(3):261–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Linder BJ, Gebhart JB, Occhino JA. Total colpocleisis: technical considerations. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(11):1767–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian J. Linder.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this video article and any accompany images.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

(MP4 54198 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Raju, R., Occhino, J.A. & Linder, B.J. LeFort partial colpocleisis: tips and technique. Int Urogynecol J 31, 1697–1699 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-04194-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-04194-3

Navigation