Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis
The objective was to discuss the importance of apical suspension following vaginal hysterectomy and demonstrate a surgical model to aide in educating learners on a variety of apical suspension procedures.
Methods
Rates of pelvic organ prolapse are not insignificant following hysterectomy. Re-support of the vaginal apex should be performed at the time of hysterectomy in those with or without a diagnosis of prolapse. Exposure to vaginal apical support procedures may be limited owing to declining rates of vaginal hysterectomy and limited trainee work hours. Surgical models are increasingly being used to supplement operating room experience. The model we present was originally developed for hysterectomy, although its design allows for teaching a variety of apical support procedures that incorporate the uterosacral ligament (USL) for support. We demonstrate performing a USL suspension, internal McCall suture, and modified McCall suture using the model.
Results
The model is constructed from readily available supplies, is multi-use, and inexpensive. It allows learners to identify relevant anatomy, understand/visualize surgical steps, and practice suturing technique.
Conclusion
Pelvic organ prolapse is common in women, although opportunities to teach apical suspension procedures may be limited. The proposed vaginal surgery simulator can be used to supplement the experience of gynecological surgery trainees with apical suspension procedures.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Blandon RE, Bharucha AE, Melton LJ 3rd, et al. Incidence of pelvic floor repair after hysterectomy: a population-based cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(6):664 e1–7.
Practice Bulletin No. 185 Summary: Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130(5):1170–1172.
Fairchild PS, Kamdar NS, Berger MB, Morgan DM. Rates of colpopexy and colporrhaphy at the time of hysterectomy for prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(2):262 e1–7.
Ross WT, Meister MR, Shepherd JP, Olsen MA, Lowder JL. Utilization of apical vaginal support procedures at time of inpatient hysterectomy performed for benign conditions: a national estimate. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(4):436.e1–8.
Meriwether KV, Antosh DD, Olivera CK, et al. Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;219(2):129–146.e2.
Jeppson PC, Sung VW. Hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse: indications and techniques. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2014;57(1):72–82.
Lykke R, Blaakær J, Ottesen B, Gimbel H. The indication for hysterectomy as a risk factor for subsequent pelvic organ prolapse repair. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(11):1661–5.
Forsgren C, Lundholm C, Johansson AL, Cnattingius S, Zetterström J, Altman D. Vaginal hysterectomy and risk of pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(1):43–8.
Greer JA, Segal S, Salva CR, Arya LA. Development and validation of simulation training for vaginal hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21(1):74–82.
Miyazaki D, Matthews CA, Kia MV, El Haraki AS, Miyazaki N, Chen CCG. Validation of an educational simulation model for vaginal hysterectomy training: a pilot study. Int Urogynecol J. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3761-9.
Malacarne DR, Escobar CM, Lam CJ, Ferrante KL, Szyld D, Lerner VT. Teaching vaginal hysterectomy via simulation: creation and validation of the objective skills assessment tool for simulated vaginal hysterectomy on a task trainer and performance among different levels of trainees. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000558.
Barrier BF, Thompson AB, McCullough MW, Occhino JA. A novel and inexpensive vaginal hysterectomy simulator. Simul Healthc. 2012;7(6):374–9.
Green I, et al. SimVHaT Mayo Clinic Vaginal Hysterectomy Trainer. Accessed 3 December 2018. Available from: https://www.acog.org/About-ACOG/ACOG-Departments/Simulations-Consortium/Simulations-Consortium-Tool-Kit.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
ICG received an unrestricted educational grant from Intuitive Surgical for 50 K, 2017–2018. Otherwise, the authors have no conflicts of interest or financial disclosures.
Consent
Informed consent was not obtained for publication of this video article, as patient cases or images were not included.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kisby, C.K., Baker, M.V., Green, I.C. et al. Teaching learners to raise the roof: a vaginal surgery simulator for apical suspension. Int Urogynecol J 30, 1771–1773 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-03985-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-03985-y