Abstract
This case presents the work-up and management of a spina bifida patient with recurrent prolapse. Four international experts also provide their evaluation of and approach to this complex case. According to the literature, little is known regarding the approach to the management of this specific patient population.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Buchsbaum GM, Lee TG. Vaginal obliterative procedures for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2017;72(3):175–83.
Rahkola-Soisalo P, Mikkola TS, Altman D, Falconer C, for Nordic TVM Group. Pelvic organ prolapse repair using the uphold vaginal support system: 5-year follow-up. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000530.
Lo TS, Pue LB, Tan YL, Hsieh WC, Kao CC, Uy-Patrimonio MC. Anterior-apical single-incision mesh surgery (uphold): 1-year outcomes on lower urinary tract symptoms, anatomy and ultrasonography. Int Urogynecol J. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3691-6.
Urogynecologic surgical mesh: update on the safety and effectiveness of transvaginal placement for pelvic organ prolapse. https://www.fda.gov/downloads/medicaldevices/safety/alertsandnotices/ucm262760.pdf.
Alas AN, Pereira I, Chandrasekaran N, Devakumar H, Espaillat L, Hurtado E, et al. Apical sling: an approach to posthysterectomy vault prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27:1433–6.
Zebede S, Smith AL, Lefevre R, Aguilar VC, Davila GW. Reattachment of the endopelvic fascia to the apex during anterior colporraphy: does the type of suture matter? Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(1):141–5.
Barber MD, Brubaker L, Burgio KL, et al. Comparison of 2 transvaginal surgical approaches and perioperative behavioral therapy for apical vaginal prolapse: the OPTIMAL randomized trial. JAMA. 2014;311(10):1023–34.
Morgan DM, Rogers MA, Huebner M, Wei JT, Delancey JO. Heterogeneity in anatomic outcome of sacrospinous ligament fixation for prolapse: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(6):1424–33.
Pariente JL, Villars F, Bram R, Ibarboure E. Mechanical evaluation of various suburethral tapes used for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Prog Urol. 2005;15(6):1106–9.
Jijon A, Hegde A, Arias B, Aguilar V, Davila GW. An inelastic retropubic suburethral sling in women with intrinsice sphincter deficiency. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(8):1325–30.
Liu JS, Vo AX, Doolittle J, Hamoui N, Lewicky-Gaupp C, Kielb SJ. Characterizing pelvic organ prolapse in adult spina bifida patients. Urology. 2016;97:273–6.
Khavari R, Tokaz MC, Stewart JN, Boone TB. Pelvic organ prolapse in female patients presenting to transitional urology care clinic. J Urol. 2015;194(6):1654–8.
Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, Haya N, Brown J. Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse. Chochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;10:CD012376.
Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, Haya N, Brown J. Surgery for women with anterior compartment prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;11:CD004014.
Schimpf MO, Abed H, Sanses T, White AB, Lowenstein L, Ward RM, et al. Graft and mesh use in transvaginal prolapse repair: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(1):81–91.
Sammarco AG, Swenson CW, Kamdar NS, Kobernik EK, DeLancey JOL, Nallamothu B, et al. Rate of pelvic organ prolapse surgery among privately insured women in the United States, 2010-2013. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131(3):484–92.
Acknowledgements
Danielle Antosh is site principal investigator for Cook Myosite; the randomized trial was funded by Cook: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01893138.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
None.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Antosh, D.D., Yurteri-Kaplan, L.A., Shveiky, D. et al. FPMRS challenges on behalf of the Collaborative Research in Pelvic Surgery Consortium (CoRPS): managing complicated cases. Int Urogynecol J 30, 1039–1043 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-03955-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-03955-4
