Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

FPMRS challenges on behalf of the Collaborative Research in Pelvic Surgery Consortium (CoRPS): managing complicated cases

Series 3: Challenging recurrent prolapse in a medically complicated patient

  • Clinical Opinion
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This case presents the work-up and management of a spina bifida patient with recurrent prolapse. Four international experts also provide their evaluation of and approach to this complex case. According to the literature, little is known regarding the approach to the management of this specific patient population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Austria)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Buchsbaum GM, Lee TG. Vaginal obliterative procedures for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2017;72(3):175–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rahkola-Soisalo P, Mikkola TS, Altman D, Falconer C, for Nordic TVM Group. Pelvic organ prolapse repair using the uphold vaginal support system: 5-year follow-up. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000530.

  3. Lo TS, Pue LB, Tan YL, Hsieh WC, Kao CC, Uy-Patrimonio MC. Anterior-apical single-incision mesh surgery (uphold): 1-year outcomes on lower urinary tract symptoms, anatomy and ultrasonography. Int Urogynecol J. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3691-6.

  4. Urogynecologic surgical mesh: update on the safety and effectiveness of transvaginal placement for pelvic organ prolapse. https://www.fda.gov/downloads/medicaldevices/safety/alertsandnotices/ucm262760.pdf.

  5. Alas AN, Pereira I, Chandrasekaran N, Devakumar H, Espaillat L, Hurtado E, et al. Apical sling: an approach to posthysterectomy vault prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27:1433–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zebede S, Smith AL, Lefevre R, Aguilar VC, Davila GW. Reattachment of the endopelvic fascia to the apex during anterior colporraphy: does the type of suture matter? Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(1):141–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Barber MD, Brubaker L, Burgio KL, et al. Comparison of 2 transvaginal surgical approaches and perioperative behavioral therapy for apical vaginal prolapse: the OPTIMAL randomized trial. JAMA. 2014;311(10):1023–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Morgan DM, Rogers MA, Huebner M, Wei JT, Delancey JO. Heterogeneity in anatomic outcome of sacrospinous ligament fixation for prolapse: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(6):1424–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pariente JL, Villars F, Bram R, Ibarboure E. Mechanical evaluation of various suburethral tapes used for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Prog Urol. 2005;15(6):1106–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jijon A, Hegde A, Arias B, Aguilar V, Davila GW. An inelastic retropubic suburethral sling in women with intrinsice sphincter deficiency. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(8):1325–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu JS, Vo AX, Doolittle J, Hamoui N, Lewicky-Gaupp C, Kielb SJ. Characterizing pelvic organ prolapse in adult spina bifida patients. Urology. 2016;97:273–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Khavari R, Tokaz MC, Stewart JN, Boone TB. Pelvic organ prolapse in female patients presenting to transitional urology care clinic. J Urol. 2015;194(6):1654–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, Haya N, Brown J. Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse. Chochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;10:CD012376.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, Haya N, Brown J. Surgery for women with anterior compartment prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;11:CD004014.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schimpf MO, Abed H, Sanses T, White AB, Lowenstein L, Ward RM, et al. Graft and mesh use in transvaginal prolapse repair: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(1):81–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sammarco AG, Swenson CW, Kamdar NS, Kobernik EK, DeLancey JOL, Nallamothu B, et al. Rate of pelvic organ prolapse surgery among privately insured women in the United States, 2010-2013. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131(3):484–92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Danielle Antosh is site principal investigator for Cook Myosite; the randomized trial was funded by Cook: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01893138.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ladin A. Yurteri-Kaplan.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Antosh, D.D., Yurteri-Kaplan, L.A., Shveiky, D. et al. FPMRS challenges on behalf of the Collaborative Research in Pelvic Surgery Consortium (CoRPS): managing complicated cases. Int Urogynecol J 30, 1039–1043 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-03955-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-03955-4

Keywords

Navigation