Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Validation of the Turkish version of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-vaginal symptoms (ICIQ-VS)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire–Vaginal Symptoms (ICIQ-VS) was developed and validated in 2006 to evaluate vaginal symptoms, sexual matters, and quality of life of patients. This study aimed to validate the Turkish version of ICIQ-VS.

Methods

The English version of the questionnaire was translated into Turkish. On the basis of the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system, symptomatic women with ≥ 2 grade pelvic organ prolapse (POP) were included in the symptomatic (patient) group and asymptomatic women with ≤ 1 grade POP in the asymptomatic (control) group. The questionnaire was administered three times: after the first examination of the women (T1), 3 weeks after T1 (T2), and 3 months after the POP surgery (T3).

Results

A total of 111 women were included in the study (symptomatic group, n = 53; asymptomatic group, n = 58). The missing data were ˂ 2%; the test-retest reliability was between 0.807 and 0.963, and the differences between the symptomatic and asymptomatic women were significant (p ˂ 0.001). A significant positive correlation existed between POP-Q and the vaginal symptom score, sexual matter score, and quality-of-life score (rs = 0.844, 0.393, and 0.698, respectively; p < 0.001). The Cronbach’s alpha was 0.72 for the vaginal symptom score and 0.73 for the sexual matter score. The sensitivity to change was significant (p ˂ 0.05). The effect size values of the vaginal symptom score, sexual matter score, and quality-of-life score were 2.55, 2.33, and 1.56, respectively.

Conclusion

The Turkish version of ICIQ-VS was successfully validated in this study, and a newer version of the questionnaire was made available for assessing vaginal symptoms, sexual matters, and quality of life of patients with POP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nygaard I, Barber MD, Burgio KL, Kenton K, Meikle S, Schaffer J, et al. Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. JAMA. 2008;300:1311–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.300.11.1311.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Wu JM, Vaughan CP, Goode PS, Redden DT, Burgio KL, Richter HE, et al. Prevalence and trends of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:141–3. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000000057.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Price N, Jackson SR, Avery K, Brookes ST, Abrams P. Development and psychometric evaluation of the ICIQ vaginal symptoms questionnaire: the ICIQ-VS. BJOG. 2006;113(6):700–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00938.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Banerjee C, Banerjee M, Hatzmann W, Schiermeier S, Sachse K, Hellmich M, et al. The German version of the ‘ICIQ vaginal symptoms Questionnaire’ (German ICIQ-VS): an instrument validation study. Urol Int. 2010;85(1):70–9. https://doi.org/10.1159/000316337.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tamanini JT, Almeida FG, Girotti ME, Riccetto CL, Palma PC, Rios LA. The Portuguese validation of the international consultation on incontinence questionnaire-vaginal symptoms (ICIQ-VS) for Brazilian women with pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19(10):1385–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-008-0641-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ekanayake CD, Pathmeswaran A, Herath RP, Perera HS, Patabendige M, Wijesinghe PS. Validation of the international consultation on incontinence questionnaire-vaginal symptoms (ICIQ-VS) in two south-Asian languages. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28:1849–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3294-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Athanasiou S, Grigoriadis T, Kyriakidou N, Giannoulis G, Antsaklis A. The validation of international consultation on incontinence questionnaires in the Greek language. Neurourol Urodyn. 2012;31(7):1141–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Arenholt LTS, Glavind-Kristensen M. M, Bøggild H, Glavind K. Translation and validation of the international consultation on incontinence questionnaire vaginal symptoms (ICIQ-VS): the Danish version. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(1):17–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3541-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46(12):1417–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-N.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kaplan PB, Sut N, Sut HK. Validation, cultural adaptation and responsiveness of two pelvic-floor-specific quality-of-life questionnaires, PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7, in a Turkish population. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012;162:229–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.03.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cam C, Sancak P, Karahan N, Sancak A, Celik C, Karateke A. Validation of the short form of the pelvic organ prolapse/urinary incontinence sexual questionnaire (PISQ-12) in a Turkish population. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;146:104–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.05.016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cam C, Sakalli M, Ay P, Aran T, Cam M, Karateke A. Validation of the prolapse quality of life questionnaire (P-QOL) in a Turkish population. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007;135:132–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2007.06.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zuchelo LTS, Bezerra IMP, Da Silva ATM, Gomes JM, et al. Questionnaires to evaluate pelvic floor dysfunction in the postpartum period: a systematic review. Int J Women’s Health. 2018;10:409–24. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S164266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. New York: Academic Press; 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Karl-Günter N, Sven S, Ibrahim A, Michael A. Laparoscopic pectopexy: a prospective, randomized, comparative clinical trial of standard laparoscopic sacral colpocervicopexy with the new laparoscopic pectopexy—postoperative results and intermediate-term follow-up in a pilot study. J Endourol. 2015;29:210–5. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2014.0413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Persu C, Chapple CR, Cauni V, Gutue S, Geavlete P. Pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POP-Q)—a new era in pelvic prolapse staging. J Med Life. 2011;4:75–81.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kingsberg AS, Simon JA, Bradford A, Bitzer J, et al. Female sexual dysfunction-medical and psychological treatments, committee 14. J Sex Med. 2017;14:1463–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.05.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Thomas HN, Hamm M, Hess R, Thurston RC. Changes in sexual function among midlife women. Menopause. 2017;25:1. https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000000988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Işıl Köleli.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Köleli, I., Astepe, B.S. Validation of the Turkish version of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-vaginal symptoms (ICIQ-VS). Int Urogynecol J 30, 1203–1209 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-03951-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-03951-8

Keywords

Navigation