Skip to main content
Log in

A multipurpose uterine/vaginal manipulator for laparoscopic urogynecologic procedures

  • IUJ Video
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The use of an appropriate uterine manipulator is key to various laparoscopic gynecologic procedures. Adequate uterine manipulation is important for total or supracervical laparoscopic hysterectomies, laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy as well as laparoscopic repair of vaginal vault prolapse. While several uterine manipulators are available to choose from, their use may be specific to certain procedures and their cost may vary as well.

Methods

This video aims to provide an introduction to a multipurpose, reusable uterine/vaginal manipulator that can be used for laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy, laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, laparoscopic hysteropexy as well as laparoscopic repair of vaginal vault prolapse.

Results

The video highlights the user-friendly, easy-to-clean, reusable, multipurpose uterine/vaginal manipulator.

Conclusions

The manipulator is designed for an efficient combination of laparoscopic urogynecologic procedures and supracervical hysterectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. van den Haak L, Alleblas C, Nieboer TE, Rhemrev JP, Jansen FW. Efficacy and safety of uterine manipulators in laparoscopic surgery: a review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;292(5):1003–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Croft K, Mattingly PJ, Bosse P, Naumann RW. Physician education on controllable costs significantly reduces cost of laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017;24(1):62–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Murphy M, Holzberg A, van Raalte H, Kohli N, Goldman HB, Lucente V, et al. Time to rethink: an evidence-based response from pelvic surgeons to the FDA safety communication: “UPDATE on serious complications associated with transvaginal placement of surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse”. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(1):5–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schaer GN, Koechli OR, Haller U. Single-use versus reusable laparoscopic surgical instruments: a comparative cost analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;173(6):1812–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriel N. Schaer.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The first author is, together with Karl Storz, the developer of the instrument. Royalties go to the employer/hospital. Therefore, there is no financial conflict of interest of the first or other two authors.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this video article and any accompanying images.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

(MP4 57593 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schaer, G.N., Sarlos, D. & Khan, Z. A multipurpose uterine/vaginal manipulator for laparoscopic urogynecologic procedures. Int Urogynecol J 30, 1377–1379 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-03940-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-03940-x

Keywords

Navigation