Skip to main content

Can wearing high heels influence anal canal pressure and the severity of fecal incontinence?

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Wearing high heels may not only produce deleterious effects on the musculoskeletal system and on the general posture, but also on the activity of pelvic floor muscles. However, no data are currently available concerning the link between fecal incontinence and wearing high heels. Our aim was to determine whether wearing high-heeled shoes could influence anal canal pressure values in patients suffering from fecal incontinence.

Methods

In this retrospective monocentric study, 338 female patients were included. Clinical data, including the Wexner score, and manometric data were recorded (using 3D high-resolution anorectal manometry). Wearing high heels was defined by the use of high-heeled shoes at least four times a week for 4 consecutive hours with at least 1 year of usage time and heels ≥3 cm. Two sub-groups were defined: “high heels” vs “no high heels.”

Results

The two subgroups were comparable for clinical data, including Wexner score, except for a higher age, menopause and hormone replacement therapy, and urinary incontinence in the group with “high heels.” No statistical difference was observed concerning the anal canal pressure. Using analysis by logistic regression, only age was related to a significantly lower resting pressure.

Conclusions

In this retrospective cohort of women with fecal incontinence, no clinical or manometric differences were observed between women who wore high heels versus those who did not. Because there is limited knowledge on this potential link and because the pelvic tilt may vary according to age and the habit of walking with high heels, further studies are necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

References

  1. 1.

    De Oliveira Pezzan PA, João SM, Ribeiro AP, Manfio EF. Postural assessment of lumbar lordosis and pelvic alignment angles in adolescent users and nonusers of high-heeled shoes. J Manip Physiol Ther. 2011;34(9):614–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Yu J, Cheung JT, Fan Y, Zhang Y, Leung AK, Zhang M. Development of a finite element model of female foot for high-heeled shoe design. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2008;23(Suppl 1):S31–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Mika A, Oleksy L, Mika P, Marchewka A, Clark BC. The effect of walking in high- and low-heeled shoes on erector spinae activity and pelvis kinematics during gait. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;91(5):425–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Ebbeling CJ, Hamill J, Crussemeyer JA. Lower extremity mechanics and energy cost of walking in high-heeled shoes. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1994;19(4):190–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Russell BS, Muhlenkamp KA, Hoiriis KT, Desimone CM. Measurement of lumbar lordosis in static standing posture with and without high-heeled shoes. J Chiropr Med. 2012;11(3):145–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Chen CH, Huang MH, Chen TW, Weng MC, Lee CL, Wang GJ. Relationship between ankle position and pelvic floor muscle activity in female stress urinary incontinence. Urology. 2005;66(2):288–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Vitton V, Baumstarck-Barrau K, Brardjanian S, Caballe I, Bouvier M, Grimaud JC. Impact of high-level sport practice on anal incontinence in a healthy young female population. J Women’s Health (Larchmt). 2011;20(5):757–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36(1):77–97.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Cheeney G, Remes-Troche JM, Attaluri A, Rao SS. Investigation of anal motor characteristics of the sensorimotor response (SMR) using 3-D anorectal pressure topography. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2011;300(2):G236–40.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Barthet M, Bellon P, Abou E, et al. Anal endosonography for assessment of anal incontinence with a linear probe: relationships with clinical and manometric features. Int J Color Dis. 2002;17(2):123–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Vitton V, Vignally P, Barthet M, et al. Dynamic anal endosonography and MRI defecography in diagnosis of pelvic floor disorders: comparison with conventional defecography. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54(11):1398–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Barthet M, Portier F, Heyries L, et al. Dynamic anal endosonography may challenge defecography for assessing dynamic anorectal disorders: results of a prospective pilot study. Endoscopy. 2000;32(4):300–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Benezech A, Bouvier M, Vitton V. Faecal incontinence: current knowledges and perspectives. World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol. 2016;7(1):59–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Russell BS. The effect of high-heeled shoes on lumbar lordosis: a narrative review and discussion of the disconnect between internet content and peer-reviewed literature. J Chiropr Med. 2010;9(4):166–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Grimmer K, Dansie B, Milanese S, Pirunsan U, Trott P. Adolescent standing postural response to backpack loads: a randomised controlled experimental study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2002;3:10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Capson AC, Nashed J, McLean L. The role of lumbopelvic posture in pelvic floor muscle activation in continent women. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2011;21(1):166–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Chen HL, Lin YC, Chien WJ, Huang WC, Lin HY, Chen PL. The effect of ankle position on pelvic floor muscle contraction activity in women. J Urol. 2009;181(3):1217–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Sapsford RR, Hodges PW, Richardson CA, Cooper DH, Markwell SJ, Jull GA. Co-activation of the abdominal and pelvic floor muscles during voluntary exercises. Neurourol Urodyn. 2001;20(1):31–42.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Bo K. Pelvic floor muscle training is effective in treatment of female stress urinary incontinence, but how does it work? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2004;15(2):76–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Neumann P, Gill V. Pelvic floor and abdominal muscle interaction: EMG activity and intra-abdominal pressure. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2002;13(2):125–32.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Makol A, Grover M, Whitehead WE. Fecal incontinence in women: causes and treatment. Womens Health (Lond). 2008;4(5):517–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Macmillan AK, Merrie AE, Marshall RJ, Parry BR. The prevalence of fecal incontinence in community-dwelling adults: a systematic review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47(8):1341–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Snow RE, Williams KR. High heeled shoes: their effect on center of mass position, posture, three-dimensional kinematics, rearfoot motion, and ground reaction forces. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75(5):568–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Bo K, Finckenhagen HB. Is there any difference in measurement of pelvic floor muscle strength in supine and standing position? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003;82(12):1120–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Morgan DM, Kaur G, Hsu Y, et al. Does vaginal closure force differ in the supine and standing positions? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(5):1722–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Thekkinkattil DK, Lim MK, Nicholls MJ, Sagar PM, Finan PJ, Burke DA. Contribution of posture to anorectal manometric measurements: are the measurements in left-lateral position physiologic? Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50(12):2112–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laure Luciano.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vitton, V., Luciano, L., Ortiz, S. et al. Can wearing high heels influence anal canal pressure and the severity of fecal incontinence?. Int Urogynecol J 30, 2049–2054 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-03902-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • High-heeled shoes
  • Fecal incontinence
  • 3D high-resolution anorectal manometry