Skip to main content

Incidence of perineal pain and dyspareunia following spontaneous vaginal birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Perineal pain and dyspareunia are experienced by women undergoing a vaginal birth that can have short and longer term physical and psychological morbidities. This review aimed to determine the incidence of perineal pain and dyspareunia following spontaneous vaginal birth (SVB) with intact perineum, first and second-degree perineal trauma or episiotomy.

Methods

Searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED and MIDIRS (inception – December 2017) were undertaken with selection criteria of any study evaluating the effect of intact perineum, first- or second-degree perineal trauma on perineal pain or dyspareunia in women with SVB.

Results

Eighteen studies (8 RCTs and 10 NRSs) were included. Fourteen and 12 studies were undertaken to assess perineal pain and dyspareunia after SVB, respectively. Meta-analysis of 16 studies (3133 women) demonstrated that women at 2 days postpartum experienced nearly the same incidence of perineal pain whether perineal trauma existed or not. At 4–10 days postpartum there was a significant reduction in the incidence of perineal pain for both presence and absence of any perineal trauma. Episiotomy was associated with the highest rate of perineal pain. The incidence of dyspareunia was high at resumption of sexual intercourse following SVB with an intact perineum. At 12 months, women still experienced dyspareunia whether perineal trauma existed or not.

Conclusions

Women experience perineal pain and dyspareunia regardless of the presence or absence of perineal trauma after SVB; nonetheless, the reported incidence is higher if perineal trauma occurred.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

References

  1. Estadística IneIN. Estadística de nacimientos. Movimiento natural de la población [Internet]. [cited 2018 Jun 5]. Available from: http://www.ine.es/dyngs/INEbase/es/categoria.htm?c=Estadistica_P&cid=1254735573002

  2. Statista: the statistics portal. Vaginal and C-section deliveries in US 2013 by risk | Statistic [Internet]. Hamburg: Statista. 2016 [cited 2018 Jun 5]. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/633106/rate-of-total-deliveries-in-us-by-risk-level-and-delivery-type/

  3. National Health System. NHS Digital. NHS Maternity Statistics, England 2016-17 [Internet]. London. 2017 [cited 2018 Jun 5]. Available from: https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/nhs-maternity-statistics/2016-17

  4. Observatorio de salud de las mujeres. Informe sobre la Atención al Parto y Nacimiento en el Sistema Nacional de Salud. Estrategia de atención al parto normal en el Sistema Nacional de Salud. [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2018 Jul 31]. Available from: https://www.msssi.gob.es/organizacion/sns/planCalidadSNS/pdf/InformeFinalEAPN_revision8marzo2015.pdf

  5. Petz B. Birth & Death Rates | Ecology Global Network [Internet]. Ecology Communications Group, Inc. (ECG). 2010 [cited 2018 Aug 1]. Available from: http://www.ecology.com/birth-death-rates/

  6. Woolhouse H, Gartland D, Perlen S, Donath S, Brown SJ. Physical health after childbirth and maternal depression in the first 12 months post partum: results of an Australian nulliparous pregnancy cohort study. Midwifery. 2014;30(3):378–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Webb SS, Sherburn M, Ismail KMK. Managing perineal trauma after childbirth. BMJ. 2014;349:g6829.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Macarthur AJ, Macarthur C. Incidence, severity, and determinants of perineal pain after vaginal delivery: a prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(4):1199–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Olsson A, Lundqvist M, Faxelid E, Nissen E. Women’s thoughts about sexual life after childbirth: focus group discussions with women after childbirth. Scand J Caring Sci. 2005;19(4):381–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. O’Malley D, Higgins A, Smith V. Postpartum sexual health: a principle-based concept analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2015;71(10):2247–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McDonald E, Gartland D, Small R, Brown S. Dyspareunia and childbirth: a prospective cohort study. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;122(5):672–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. De Souza A, Dwyer PL, Charity M, Thomas E, Ferreira CHJ. The effects of mode delivery on postpartum sexual function: a prospective study. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;122(10):1410–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kettle C, Dowswell T, Ismail KMK. Absorbable suture materials for primary repair of episiotomy and second-degree tears. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;6.

  14. Kettle C, Dowswell T, Ismail KM. Continuous and interrupted suturing techniques for repair of episiotomy or second-degree tears. Cochrane Libr. 2012;11.

  15. Standring S. Gray’s anatomy: the anatomical basis of clinical practice. 41st ed. London: Elsiever; 2016. 1562 p

    Google Scholar 

  16. Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(1):5–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Klein M, Gauthier RJ, Robbins JM, Kaczorowski J, Waghorn K, Gelfand M, et al. Relationship of episiotomy to perineal trauma and morbidity, sexual dysfunction, and pelvic floor relaxation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;171(3):591–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Persico G, Vergani P, Cestaro C, Grandolfo M. Assessment of postpartum perineal pain after vaginal delivery: prevalence, severity and determinants. A prospective observational study. Minerva Ginecol. 2013;65(6):669–78.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Safarinejad M, Kolahi A, Hosseini L. The effect of the mode of delivery on the quality of life, sexual function, and sexual satisfaction in primiparous women and their husbands. J Sex Med. 2009;6(6):1645–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Leeman L, Rogers R, Greulich B, Albers L. Do unsutured second-degree perineal lacerations affect postpartum functional outcomes? J Am Board Fam Med. 2007;20(5):451–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. de Almeida SFS, Gonzalez Riesco ML. Randomized controlled clinical trial on two perineal trauma suture techniques in normal delivery. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2008;16(2):272–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Aslam R, Khan SA, Amir ZU, Amir F. Interrupted versus continuous sutures for repair of episiotomy or 2nd degree perineal tears. J Ayub Med Coll JAMC. 2015;27(3):680–3.

    Google Scholar 

  23. McElhinney B, Glenn D, Dornan G, Harper M. Episiotomy repair: Vicryl versus Vicryl rapide. Ulster Med J. 2000;69(1):27–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Morano S, Mistrangelo E, Pastorino D, Lijoi D, Costantini S, Ragni N. A randomized comparison of suturing techniques for episiotomy and laceration repair after spontaneous vaginal birth. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2006;13(5):457–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Valenzuela P, Saiz Puente MS, Valero JL, Azorin R, Ortega R, Guijarro R. Continuous versus interrupted sutures for repair of episiotomy or second-degree perineal tears: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2009;116(3):436–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. OSTEBA. Clinical Practice Guideline on Care in Normal Childbirth. Quality Plan for the Spanish National Healthcare System of the Spanish Ministry for Health and Social Policy. 2010.

  27. Intrapartum care for healthy women and babies | Guidance and guidelines | NICE. RCOG. NICE. 2014.

  28. Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Munn Z, Moola S, Riitano D, Lisy K. The development of a critical appraisal tool for use in systematic reviews addressing questions of prevalence. Int J Heal Policy Manag. 2014;3(3):123–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Team RC. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2013.

  31. Schwarzer G. Meta: an R package for meta-analysis. R News. 2007;7(3):40–5.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Viechtbauer W. Conducting Meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J Stat Softw. 2010;36(3):1–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Higgins J, Thompson S. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Wiley Online Libr. 2002;21:1539–58.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Beard R, Boyd I, Sims C. A trial of polyglycolic acid and chromic catgut sutures in episiotomy repair. Br J Clin Pract. 1974;28(12):409–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Graczyk S, Limanowski M, Wyduba M. Suture of the episiotomy wound: comparison of two techniques from clinical and cosmetic aspects. Ginekol Pol. 1998;69(1):6–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Perveen F, Shabbir T. Perineal repair: comparison of suture materials and suturing techniques. J Surg Pakistan. 2009;14(1).

  38. Albers L, Garcia J, Renfrew M, McCandlish R, Elbourne D. Distribution of genital tract trauma in childbirth and related postnatal pain. Birth. 1999;26(1):11–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Harrison R, Brennan M, North P, Reed J, Wickham E. Is routine episiotomy necessary? Br Med J. 1984;288:1971–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Kalis V, Landsmanova J, Bednarova B, Karbanova J, Laine K, Rokyta Z. Evaluation of the incision angle of mediolateral episiotomy at 60 degrees. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2011;112(3):220–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Layton S. The effect of perineal trauma on women’s health. Br J Midwifery. 2004;12(4):231–6 6p.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Soares A, Couceiro T, Cavalcanti Lima L, Lago Flores F, Alcoforado E, Couceiro Filho R. Association of pain catastrophizing with the incidence and severity of acute and persistent perineal pain after natural childbirth: longitudinal cohort study. Brazilian J Anesthesiol. 2013;63(4):317–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. O’Malley D, Higgins A, Begley C, Daly D, Smith V. Prevalence of and risk factors associated with sexual health issues in primiparous women at 6 and 12 months postpartum; a longitudinal prospective cohort study (the MAMMI study). BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):196.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Durnea CM, Khashan AS, Kenny LC, Tabirca SS, O’Reilly BA. An insight into pelvic floor status in nulliparous women. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(3):337–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Dietz HP. Pelvic floor trauma in childbirth. Aust New Zeal J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;53(3):220–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kettle C, Hills RK, Jones P, Darby L, Gray R, Johanson R. Continuous versus interrupted perineal repair with standard or rapidly absorbed sutures after spontaneous vaginal birth: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;359(9325):2217–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Federative Committee on Anatomical Terminology. Terminologia anatomica [Internet]. 1998 [cited 2018 Oct 11]. p. A09.5.00.001 Entity Page. Available from: https://www.unifr.ch/ifaa/Public/EntryPage/TA98 Tree/Entity TA98 EN/09.5.00.001 Entity TA98 EN.htm.

  48. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Intrapartum care for healthy women and babies. (Clinical Guideline No 190). NICE; 2014. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg190

  49. Leeman L, Fullilove A, Borders N, Manocchio R, Albers L, Rogers R. Postpartum perineal pain in a low episiotomy setting: association with severity of genital trauma, labor care, and birth variables. Birth. 2009;36(4):283–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Leeman L, Rogers R, Borders N, Teaf D, Qualls C. The effect of perineal lacerations on pelvic floor function and anatomy at 6 months postpartum in a prospective cohort of nulliparous women. Birth. 2016;43(4):293–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margarita Manresa.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Conference Presentations

IUGA 43rd Annual Meeting, Vienna, Austria. 27–30 June 2018.

Electronic supplementary material

Table S1

Quality assessment criteria for NRSs using Joana Briggs Institute Prevalence Critical Appraisal Tool (DOCX 13 kb)

Figure S1

Quality assessment of the studies included in the Perineal Pain and Dyspareunia Systematic Review (DOCX 107 kb)

Appendix 1

: PRISMA 2009 Check list (DOC 66 kb)

Appendix 2

: MEDLINE search strategies (DOCX 13 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Manresa, M., Pereda, A., Bataller, E. et al. Incidence of perineal pain and dyspareunia following spontaneous vaginal birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J 30, 853–868 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-03894-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-03894-0

Keywords

  • Perineal trauma
  • Perineal pain
  • Dyspareunia
  • Spontaneous vaginal birth
  • Systematic review