Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis
To assess whether detrusor underactivity (DU) is a risk factor for voiding dysfunction (VD) after transobturator tape (TOT) and if a detrusor pressure at maximum flow (PdetQmax) value predicts postoperative VD in DU patients. Also, we examined uncomplicated patients for postoperative VD.
Methods
This is a prospective long-term study on SUI patients who underwent TOT. Exclusion criteria were preoperative POP stage ≥ 2, previous anti-incontinence surgery and comorbidities.
Patients were grouped by detrusor contractility using the projected isovolumetric pressure (PIP) index (PdetQmax + maximum flow rate) with values of 30–75 cmH2O indicating normal contractility.
Follow-up was at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months, and then annually. All patients underwent a stress test and responded to the Urogenital Distress Inventory questionnaire and to the King’s Health Questionnaire. The subjective cure was evaluated using the Patient Global Impression of Improvement.
We determined the diagnostic accuracy of PdetQmax levels using ROC curve analysis, with a cut-off point calculated for optimal sensitivity and specificity.
Results
In 2007–2013, 118 patients underwent TOT. We included 50 in the undercontractility group (G1) and 50 in the normocontractility group (G2).
Continence rates were 82% in G1 and 84% in G2 (mean follow-up 76 months). VD increased from 18 to 36% (p < 0.05) in G1 and from 14 to 16% (p = 0.198) in G2. De novo VD was 28% in G1 and 2% in G2.
In the G1 group PdetQmax ≤ 12 cmH2O predicted postoperative VD with 71.4% specificity and 80.0% sensitivity.
Conclusions
DU adversely affects the voiding phase of micturition after TOT. In DU patients, PdetQmax ≤ 12 cmH2O predicts postoperative VD.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Schimpf MO, Rahn DD, Wheeler TL, Patel M, White AB, Orejuela FJ, et al. Sling surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review and metanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211:71.e1–71.e27.
Karram MM, Segal JL, Vassallo BJ, Kleeman SD. Complications and untoward effects of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101(5 Pt 1):929–32.
Kleeman S, Goldwasser S, Vassallo B, Karram M. Predicting postoperative voiding efficiency after operation for incontinence and prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:49–52.
Salin A, Conquy S, Elie C, Touboul C, Parra J, Zerbib M, et al. Identification of risk factors for voiding dysfunction following TVT placement. Eur Urol. 2007;51:782–7.
Hong B, Park S, Kim HS, Choo MS. Factors predictive of urinary retention after a tension-free vaginal tape procedure for female stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2003;170:852–6.
Moore C, Paraiso MF. Voiding dysfunction after the tension-free vaginal tape procedure. Curr Urol Rep. 2005;6:356–9.
Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, et al. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187(1):116–26.
Osman NI, Chapple CR, Abrams P, Dmochowski R, Haab F, Nitti V, et al. Detrusor underactivity and the underactive bladder: a new clinical entity? A review of current terminology, definitions, epidemiology, etiology, and diagnosis. Eur Urol. 2014;65:389–98.
Medina CA, Costantini E, Petri E, Mourad S, Singla A, Rodríguez-Colorado S, et al. Evaluation and surgery for stress urinary incontinence: a FIGO working group report. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36:518–28.
Griffiths D. Detrusor contractility–order out of chaos. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 2004;215:93–100.
Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bø K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:10–7.
Swift SE, Yoon EA. Test-retest reliability of the cough stress test in the evaluation of urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;94:99–102.
Artibani W, Pesce F, Prezioso D, Scarpa RM, Zattoni F, Tubaro A, et al. FLOW study group. Italian validation of the urogenital distress inventory and its application in LUTS patients. Eur Urol. 2006;50:1323–9.
Ingelmann-Sundberg A, Ulmsten U. Surgical treatment of female urinary stress incontinence. Contrib Gynecol Obstet. 1983;10:51–69.
Kelleher CJ, Cardozo LD, Khullar V, Salvatore S. A new questionnaire to assess the quality of life of urinary incontinent women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;104:1374–9.
Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21:5–26.
Delorme E. Transobturator urethral suspension: mini-invasive procedure in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women. Prog Urol. 2001;11:1306–13.
Deval B, Jeffry L, Al Najjar F, Soriano D, Darai E. Determinants of patient dissatisfaction after a tension-free vaginal tape procedure for urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2002;67:2093–7.
Bullock TL, Ghoniem G, Klutke CG, Staskin DR. Advances in female stress urinary incontinence: mid-urethral slings. BJU Int. 2006;98(Suppl 1):32–40.
Kleeman S, Goldwasser S, Vassallo B, Karram M. Predicting post-operative voiding efficiency after operation for incontinence and prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:49–52.
Miller EA, Amundsen CL, Toh KL, Flynn BJ, Webster GD. Preoperative urodynamic evaluation may predict voiding dysfunction in women undergoing pubovaginal sling. J Urol. 2003;169:2234–7.
Ahn C, Bae J, Lee KS, Lee HW. Analysis of voiding dysfunction after transobturator tape procedure for stress urinary incontinence. Korean J Urol. 2015;56:823–30.
Cocci A, Cacciamani GE, Russo GI, Cerruto MA, Milanesi M, Medina LG, et al. Impact of preoperative patient characteristics and flow rate on failure, early complications, and voiding dysfunction after a transobturator tape procedure: a multicentre study. Int Neurourol J. 2017;21:282–8.
Linder BJ, Trabuco EC, Gebhart JB, Klingele CJ, Occhino JA, Elliott DS, et al. Can urodynamic parameters predict sling revision for voiding dysfunction in women undergoing synthetic midurethral sling placement? Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000521.
Resnick NM, Brandeis GH, Baumann MM, DuBeau CE, Yalla SV. Misdiagnosis of urinary incontinence in nursing home women: prevalence and a proposed solution. Neurourol Urodyn. 1996;15:599–613.
Groutz A, Gordon D, Lessing JB, Wolman I, Jaffa A, David MP. Prevalence and characteristics of voiding difficulties in women: are subjective symptoms substantiated by objective urodynamic data? Urology. 1999;54:268–72.
Valentini FA, Robain G, Marti BG. Urodynamics in women from menopause to oldest age: what motive? What diagnosis? Int Braz J Urol. 2011;37:100–7.
Griffiths DJ. Editorial: bladder failure—a condition to reckon with. J Urol. 2003;169:1011–2.
Griffiths DJ. The mechanics of the urethra and of micturition. Br J Urol. 1973;45:497–507.
Schafer W. Analysis of bladder-outlet function with the linearized passive urethral resistance relation, linPURR, and a disease-specific approach for grading obstruction: from complex to simple. World J Urol. 1995;3:47–58.
Abrams P. Bladder outlet obstruction index, bladder contractility index and bladder voiding efficiency: three simple indices to define bladder voiding function. BJU Int. 1999;84:14–5.
Acknowledgements
We thank David Nicholson for his invaluable help with and revision of the English in this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
None.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Natale, F., Illiano, E., Zucchi, A. et al. Transobturator mid-urethral sling in females with stress urinary incontinence and detrusor underactivity: effect on voiding phase. Int Urogynecol J 30, 1519–1525 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-03871-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-03871-7