Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Validation study of ultrasound bladder wall thickness measurements

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The aim was to validate ultrasound bladder wall thickness measurements. We scanned at three frequencies (5 MHz, 7 MHz and 9 MHz), using two techniques described in clinical practice and compared them with direct micrometre calliper measurements.

Methods

Bladder dome cadaver specimens were dissected from male and female cadavers. The direct micrometre calliper measurement under direct vision was used as the gold standard. We imaged using a Voluson E8 ultrasound scanner at three frequencies, using three probes: AB27D (2-7 MHz), RAB25D (2-5 MHz) and RIC50D (5–9 MHz). The specimens were scanned on two different occasions for intra-observer variability. A second operator, measured the samples again independently for the interobserver agreement. The specimens were gently placed onto a sheathed and gelled probe to avoid deformation. The method of scanning was the same for all the specimens, probes and operators.

Results

Twenty-five bladder dome specimens were assessed. The correlation of the ultrasound measurement to the direct measurement improved at higher ultrasound frequencies. Measuring from the inside of the serosal hyperechogenicity also increased the accuracy correlation with the direct measurement for all the frequencies tested.

Conclusions

This is the first study validating BWT ultrasound measurements against cadaveric bladder wall calliper measurements. Technology and technique affect accuracy, which is important in clinical practice. The use of 5-MHz probes is not recommended. The most accurate measurement was obtained using high-frequency ultrasound, where the measurement did not include the serosal brightness. These data suggest that high-frequency ultrasound should be used to assess BWT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Khullar V, Salvatore L, Cardozo L, Bourne TH, Abbott D, Kelleher C. A novel technique for measuring bladder wall thickness in women using transvaginal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1994;4:220–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Panayi DC, Tekkis P, Fernando R, Hendricken C, Khullar V. Ultrasound measurement of bladder wall thickness is associated with the overactive bladder syndrome. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29:1295–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Robinson D, Anders K, Cardozo L, Bidmead J, Toozs-Hobson P, Khullar V. Can ultrasound replace ambulatory urodynamics when investigating women with irritative urinary symptoms? BJOG. 2002;109:145–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Latthe P, Middleton L, Rachaneni S, McCooty S, Daniels J, Coomarasamy A, et al. Ultrasound bladder wall thickness and detrusor overactivity: a multicentre test accuracy study. BJOG. 2017;124:1422–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bray R, Cartwright R, Cardozo L, Hill S, Guan Z, Khullar V. Tolterodine ER reduced increased bladder wall thickness in women with overactive bladder. A randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel group study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37:237–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Robinson D, Oelke M, Khullar V, Wijkstra H, Tretter R, Stow B, et al. Bladder wall thickness in women with symptoms of overactive bladder and detrusor overactivity: results from the randomised, placebo-controlled shrink study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016;35:819–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Oelke M, Khullar V, Wijkstra H. Review on ultrasound measurement of bladder or detrusor wall thickness in women: techniques, diagnostic utility, and use in clinical trials. World J Urol. 2013;31:1093–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Muller L, Bergstrom T, Hellstrom M, Svensson E, Jacobsson B. Standardized ultrasound method for assessing detrusor muscle thickness in children. J Urol. 2000;164:134–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Akselim B, Doganay M, Ozcan N, Akselim S, Cavkaytar S. Correlation of bladder wall thickness and treatment success in types of urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28:417–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Victoria Asfour.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Asfour, V., Gibbs, K., DaSilva, A.S. et al. Validation study of ultrasound bladder wall thickness measurements. Int Urogynecol J 30, 1575–1580 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3802-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3802-4

Keywords

Navigation