Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The use of a heating pad to reduce anxiety, pain, and distress during cystoscopy in female patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

This study evaluated the effects of using a heating pad during cystoscopy on anxiety, pain, and distress in female patients.

Methods

Seventy-four female patients who underwent rigid cystoscopy between January 2017 and August 2017 were randomized to either the experimental group using a heating pad (n = 37) or the control group using a pad without heat (n = 37). In the experimental group, a heating pad was applied to the patient’s sacrum during cystoscopy. All patients completed the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-S (STAI-S, 20-80) before and after the procedure and assessed their degree of pain and distress after the procedure using a visual analog scale (0–10). Systolic and diastolic blood pressure and pulse rate were also measured before and after the procedure.

Results

Demographic characteristics, mean age, procedure duration, and pre- and post-procedural systolic and diastolic blood pressures and pulse rate were statistically similar between the experimental and control groups. The mean STAI-S score of the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group (33.1 ± 10.1 vs 48.2 ± 11.1, p < 0.001). The experimental group had significantly lower pain and distress scores (visual analog scale, 3.8 ± 1.6 and 3.8 ± 1.8 respectively,) than the control group (6.4 ± 1.9 and 6.3 ± 2.1 respectively, both p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Using a heating pad during cystoscopy significantly reduced female patients’ anxiety, pain, and distress. We found this to be a safe, simple, and effective tool to use during cystoscopy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lodde M, Mian C, Comploj E, Palermo S, Longhi E, Marberger M, et al. uCyt+ test: alternative to cystoscopy for less-invasive follow-up of patients with low risk of urothelial carcinoma. Urology. 2006;67:950–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Babjuk M, Bohle A, Burger M, Capoun O, Cohen D, Comperat EM, et al. EAU guidelines on non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: update 2016. Eur Urol. 2017;71:447–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Burger M, Catto JW, Dalbagni G, Grossman HB, Herr H, Karakiewicz P, et al. Epidemiology and risk factors of urothelial bladder cancer. Eur Urol. 2013;63:234–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Seklehner S, Remzi M, Fajkovic H, Saratlija-Novakovic Z, Skopek M, Resch I, et al. Prospective multi-institutional study analyzing pain perception of flexible and rigid cystoscopy in men. Urology. 2015;85:737–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Seklehner S, Engelhardt PF, Remzi M, Fajkovic H, Saratlija-Novakovic Z, Skopek M, et al. Anxiety and depression analyses of patients undergoing diagnostic cystoscopy. Qual Life Res. 2016;25:2307–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Greenstein A, Greenstein I, Senderovich S, Mabjeesh NJ. Is diagnostic cystoscopy painful? Analysis of 1,320 consecutive procedures. Int Braz J Urol. 2014;40:533–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yeo JK, Cho DY, Oh MM, Park SS, Park MG. Listening to music during cystoscopy decreases anxiety, pain, and dissatisfaction in patients: a pilot randomized controlled trial. J Endourol. 2013;27:459–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Vasudeva P, Kumar A, Kumar N, Jha SK, Kumar R, Mohanty A, et al. Effect of intraurethral dwell time of local anesthetic jelly on pain perception in men undergoing outpatient rigid cystoscopy: a randomized prospective study. J Endourol. 2014;28:846–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Robinson L. Stress and anxiety. Nurs Clin N Am. 1990;25:935–43.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wong HL, Lopez-Nahas V, Molassiotis A. Effects of music therapy on anxiety in ventilator-dependent patients. Heart Lung. 2001;30:376–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ng V, Lai A, Ho V. Comparison of forced-air warming and electric heating pad for maintenance of body temperature during total knee replacement. Anaesthesia. 2006;61:1100–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Weerasekara RM, Tennakoon SU, Suraweera HJ. Contrast therapy and heat therapy in subacute stage of grade I and II lateral ankle sprains. Foot Ankle Spec. 2016;9:307–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim JW, Kim HJ, Park YJ, Kang SG, Park JY, Bae JH, et al. The effects of a heating pad on anxiety, pain, and distress during urodynamic study in the female patients with stress urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37:997–1001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Julian LJ. Measures of anxiety: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety (HADS-A). Arthritis Care Res. 2011;63(Suppl 11):S467–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wu PY, Huang ML, Lee WP, Wang C, Shih WM. Effects of music listening on anxiety and physiological responses in patients undergoing awake craniotomy. Complement Ther Med. 2017;32:56–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Collins SL, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. The visual analogue pain intensity scale: what is moderate pain in millimetres? Pain. 1997;72:95–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Biardeau X, Lam O, Ba V, Campeau L, Corcos J. Prospective evaluation of anxiety, pain, and embarrassment associated with cystoscopy and urodynamic testing in clinical practice. Can Urol Assoc J. 2017;11:104–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yerlikaya G, Laml T, Elenskaia K, Hanzal E, Kolbl H, Umek W. Pain perception during outpatient cystoscopy: a prospective controlled study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;173:101–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Choe JH, Kwak KW, Hong JH, Lee HM. Efficacy of lidocaine spray as topical anesthesia for outpatient rigid cystoscopy in women: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial. Urology. 2008;71:561–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Patel AR, Jones JS, Angie S, Babineau D. Office based flexible cystoscopy may be less painful for men allowed to view the procedure. J Urol. 2007;177:1843–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang ZS, Wang XL, Xu CL, Zhang C, Cao Z, Xu WD, et al. Music reduces panic: an initial study of listening to preferred music improves male patient discomfort and anxiety during flexible cystoscopy. J Endourol. 2014;28:739–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Seklehner S, Saratlija-Novakovic Z, Skopek M, Fajkovic H, Remzi M, Duvnjak M, et al. Prospective, multi-institutional pain assessment of 150 women undergoing diagnostic cystoscopy. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2016;68:417–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Patel AR, Jones JS, Babineau D. Impact of real-time visualization of cystoscopy findings on procedural pain in female patients. J Endourol. 2008;22:2695–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Goldfischer ER, Cromie WJ, Karrison TG, Naszkiewicz L, Gerber GS. Randomized, prospective, double-blind study of the effects on pain perception of lidocaine jelly versus plain lubricant during outpatient rigid cystoscopy. J Urol. 1997;157:90–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Stein M, Lubetkin D, Taub HC, Skinner WK, Haberman J, Kreutzer ER. The effects of intraurethral lidocaine anesthetic and patient anxiety on pain perception during cystoscopy. J Urol. 1994;151:1518–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Song YS, Song ES, Kim KJ, Park YH, Ku JH. Midazolam anesthesia during rigid and flexible cystoscopy. Urol Res. 2007;35:139–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kesari D, Kovisman V, Cytron S, Benjamin J. Effects on pain and anxiety of patients viewing their cystoscopy in addition to a detailed explanation: a controlled study. BJU Int. 2003;92:751–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kwon WA, Lee JW, Seo HK, Oh TH, Park SC, Jeong HJ, et al. Hand-holding during cystoscopy decreases patient anxiety, pain, and dissatisfaction: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Urol Int. 2017;100:222–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Walker MR, Kallingal GJ, Musser JE, Folen R, Stetz MC, Clark JY. Treatment efficacy of virtual reality distraction in the reduction of pain and anxiety during cystoscopy. Mil Med. 2014;179:891–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang Y, Feng J, You G, Kan X, Qiu L, Chen G, et al. Heating pad for the bleeding: external warming during hemorrhage improves survival. J Trauma. 2011;71:1915–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Nadler SF, Steiner DJ, Erasala GN, Hengehold DA, Abeln SB, Weingand KW. Continuous low-level heatwrap therapy for treating acute nonspecific low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:329–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Garra G, Singer AJ, Leno R, Taira BR, Gupta N, Mathaikutty B, et al. Heat or cold packs for neck and back strain: a randomized controlled trial of efficacy. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17:484–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Nuhr M, Hoerauf K, Bertalanffy A, Bertalanffy P, Frickey N, Gore C, et al. Active warming during emergency transport relieves acute low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004;29:1499–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Denegar CR, Schimizzi ME, Dougherty DR, Friedman JE, Clark JE, Comstock BA, et al. Responses to superficial heating and cooling differ in men and women with knee osteoarthritis. Physiother Theory Pract. 2012;28:198–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mi Mi Oh.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, H.J., Kim, J.W., Park, H.S. et al. The use of a heating pad to reduce anxiety, pain, and distress during cystoscopy in female patients. Int Urogynecol J 30, 1705–1710 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3786-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3786-0

Keywords

Navigation