International Urogynecology Journal

, Volume 30, Issue 4, pp 657–660 | Cite as

Laparoscopic inguinal ligament suspension: a novel procedure to repair uterine prolapse

  • Zhiyuan DaiEmail author
  • Hui Li
  • Huimin Shu
  • Xiaohong Guan
  • Kai Zhang
IUJ Video


Introduction and hypothesis

Traditionally, surgical treatment for uterine prolapse has included hysterectomy. However, more patients now prefer a uterine-preserving operation because of concerns about fertility or sexual dysfunction. In this video, we describe a novel approach to correcting uterine prolapse in an attempt to demonstrate an alternative option for patients.


A 42-year-old woman with symptomatic stage I-IV uterine prolapse (POP-Q: Aa +2, Ba +2, C + 3, gh 6.5, pb 3, TVL 8.5, Ap 0, Bp 0, D 0) underwent inguinal ligament suspension. The principle steps and techniques to complete the operation are outlined in the video.


Prolapse repair was successfully completed without any intraoperative complications. The uterus was restored to its anatomic position. During the 12-month follow-up, neither recurrence nor postoperative complications, such as mesh exposure, de novo incontinence or bowel obstruction, etc., occurred.


Laparoscopic inguinal ligament suspension is a safe and feasible alternative for correcting the uterine prolapse. This surgery could be an attractive choice for patients who prefer a uterine-sparing surgery.


Inguinal ligament suspension Laparoscopic route Pelvic organ prolapse Uterine prolapse Uterine-sparing surgery 



Zhiyuan Dai received support from the Research Program of the Pudong Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning (PW2015D-9) and the Research Program of the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (17411967900). It is also supported by Shanghai Municipal Medical and Health Discipline Construction Projects (2017ZZ02015).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest



Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images.

Supplementary material

192_2018_3780_MOESM1_ESM.mp4 (96.7 mb)
ESM 1 (MP4 99,043 kb)


  1. 1.
    Ridgeway BM. Does prolapse equal hysterectomy? The role of uterine conservation in women with uterovaginal prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(6):802–9. Scholar
  2. 2.
    Li XL, Liu ZY, Zhou N, Zhu T, Yang YZ, Yao YQ. Long-term results of robotic sacral hysteropexy for pelvic organ prolapse in China single medical center. Int J Surg. 2016;27:128–32. Scholar
  3. 3.
    Milani R, Frigerio M, Spelzini F, Manodoro S. Transvaginal uterosacral ligament hysteropexy: a video tutorial. Int Urogynecol J. 2016.
  4. 4.
    Chen G, Ling B, Li J, Xu P, Hu W, Zhao W, et al. Laparoscopic extraperitoneal uterine suspension to anterior abdominal wall bilaterally using synthetic mesh to treat uterovaginal prolapse. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010;17(5):631–6. Scholar
  5. 5.
    Veit-Rubin N, Dubuisson J-B, Gayet-Ageron A, Lange S, Eperon I, Dubuisson J. Patient satisfaction after laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh for pelvic organ prolapse: outcome report of a continuous series of 417 patients. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(10):1685–93. Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Urogynecological Association 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Shanghai First Maternity and Infant HospitalTongji University School of MedicineShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Department of Human AnatomyTongji University School of MedicineShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations