Skip to main content
Log in

Risk of new-onset urinary incontinence 3 and 12 months after vaginal or cesarean delivery of twins: Part I

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Our purpose was to compare the prevalence of urinary incontinence (UI) 3 and 12 months after vaginal vs cesarean delivery of twins after 34 weeks of gestation.

Methods

This was a multicenter prospective cohort study conducted at 172 French maternity units and included 2812 primiparous women with twins with no prior history of UI. Participants were enrolled at the time of delivery and followed up to 12 months postpartum. The primary outcome was the prevalence of UI, both stress and urge, 3 months postpartum, based on the patient reporting any frequency of urine leakage to the first question of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Short Form (ICIQ-SF). The Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory - Short Form 20 (PFDI-20), Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire - Short Form 7 (PFIQ-7), Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12), and Medical Outcome Study Short Form-12 (SF-12) were also used.

Results

The ICIQ-SF was completed by 1155 (39.8%) and 800 (27.5%) women, respectively, at 3 and 12 months postpartum; 556 (48%) had delivered vaginally and 599 (52%) by cesarean section. The prevalence of UI at 3 months was 26% overall and was significantly higher in the vaginal delivery group at both 3 months (35% vs 17% in the cesarean group, p < 0.0001) and 12 months postpartum (38% vs 24%, p < 0.0001). UI was predominantly stress or mixed. The risk factors for UI at 3 months, determined by multivariate modeling, were vaginal delivery [odds ratio (OR) 3.073, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.3–4.105, p < 0.0001) and body mass index >25 in early pregnancy (OR 1.620, 95% CI 1.188–2.209, p = 0.0023).

Conclusions

Vaginal delivery is a risk factor for UI at 3 months after twin birth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  1. Ballanger P, Rischmann P. Female urinary incontinence. An overview of a report presented to the French urological association. Eur Urol. 1999;36:165–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Faltin D-L. Epidemiology and definition of female urinary incontinence. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 2009;38:S146–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Stockil L, Thompson J, Briffa K, Smith A, Beales D, Straker L, et al. Urogenital symptoms: prevalence, bother, associations and impact in 22 year-old women of the Raine study. Int Urogynecol J. 2018.

  4. Glazener CMA, Herbison GP, MacArthur C, Lancashire R, McGee MA, Grant AM, et al. New postnatal urinary incontinence: obstetric and other risk factors in primiparae. BJOG. 2006;113:208–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Viktrup L, Lose G. The risk of stress incontinence 5 years after first delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:82–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Burgio KL, Zyczynski H, Locher JL, Richter HE, Redden DT, Wright KC. Urinary incontinence in the 12-month postpartum period. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:1291–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wilson PD, Herbison RM, Herbison GP. Obstetric practice and the prevalence of urinary incontinence three months after delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996;103:154–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Farrell SA, Allen VM, Baskett TF. Parturition and urinary incontinence in primiparas. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;97:350–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. MacArthur C, Glazener CMA, Wilson PD, Lancashire RJ, Herbison GP, Grant AM. Persistent urinary incontinence and delivery mode history: a six-year longitudinal study. BJOG. 2006;113:218–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Blondel B, Macfarlane A, Gissler M, Breart G, Zeitlin J, PERISTAT Study Group. Preterm birth and multiple pregnancy in European countries participating in the PERISTAT project. BJOG. 2006;113:528–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kulkarni AD, Jamieson DJ, Jones HW, Kissin DM, Gallo MF, Macaluso M, et al. Fertility treatments and multiple births in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:2218–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Legendre G, Tassel J, Salomon L-J, Fauconnier A, Bader G. Impact of twin gestation on the risk of postpartum stress incontinence. Gynécologie Obstétrique Fertil. 2010;38:238–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hutton EK, Hannah ME, Ross S, Joseph KS, Ohlsson A, Asztalos EV, et al. Maternal outcomes at 3 months after planned caesarean section vs planned vaginal birth for twin pregnancies in the twin birth study: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2015;122:1653–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Hutton EK, Hannah ME, Willan AR, Ross S, Allen AC, Armson BA, et al. Urinary stress incontinence and other maternal outcomes 2 years after caesarean or vaginal birth for twin pregnancy: a multicentre randomised trial. BJOG. 2018.

  15. Schmitz T, Prunet C, Azria E, Bohec C, Bongain A, Chabanier P, et al. Association between planned cesarean delivery and neonatal mortality and morbidity in twin pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129(6):986–95.

  16. Blondel B, Gonzales L, Raynaud P. French National Perinatal Survey 2016. INSEM and DREES. http://www.epopé-inserm.fr/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/ENP2016_rapport_complet.pdf [French].

  17. Avery K, Donovan J, Peters TJ, Shaw C, Gotoh M, Abrams P. ICIQ: a brief and robust measure for evaluating the symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2004;23:322–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. de Tayrac R, Deval B, Fernandez H, Marès P, Mapi Research Institute. Development of a linguistically validated French version of two short-form, condition-specific quality of life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 2007;36:738–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fatton B, Letouzey V, Lagrange E, Mares P, Jacquetin B, de Tayrac R. [Validation of a French version of the short form of the pelvic organ prolapse/urinary incontinence sexual questionnaire (PISQ-12)]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 2009;38:662–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kosinski M, Ware JE, Turner-Bowker DM, Gandek B. User’s manual for the SF-12v2 health survey: with a supplement documenting the SF-12® health survey. QualityMetric incorporated: Lincoln; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  21. MacArthur C, Wilson D, Herbison P, Lancashire RJ, Hagen S, Toozs-Hobson P, et al. Urinary incontinence persisting after childbirth: extent, delivery history, and effects in a 12-year longitudinal cohort study. BJOG. 2016;123:1022–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gyhagen M, Bullarbo M, Nielsen TF, Milsom I. A comparison of the long-term consequences of vaginal delivery versus caesarean section on the prevalence, severity and bothersomeness of urinary incontinence subtypes: a national cohort study in primiparous women. BJOG. 2013;120:1548–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Linde JM, Nijman RJM, Trzpis M, Broens PMA. Urinary incontinence in the Netherlands: prevalence and associated risk factors in adults. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016 (in press).

  24. Le diabète gestationnel. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 2010;39:S139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yohay D, Weintraub AY, Mauer-Perry N, Peri C, Kafri R, Yohay Z, et al. Prevalence and trends of pelvic floor disorders in late pregnancy and after delivery in a cohort of Israeli women using the PFDI-20. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;200:35–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gyhagen M, Åkervall S, Milsom I. Clustering of pelvic floor disorders 20 years after one vaginal or one cesarean birth. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26:1115–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gholitabar M, Ullman R, James D, Griffiths M, Guideline Development Group of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Caesarean section: summary of updated NICE guidance. BMJ. 2011;343:d7108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the Nimes University Hospital (AOI GCS Merri Nîmes-Montpellier).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Renaud de Tayrac.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None.

Details of ethics approval

The study was approved by the Comité consultatif sur le traitement de l’information en matière de recherche dans le domaine de la santé and by the Commission Nationale de l’Informatique et des Libertés (autorization no. 913,448).

The study was recorded on Clinicaltrials.gov no. NCT02059746.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Tayrac, R., Béchard, F., Castelli, C. et al. Risk of new-onset urinary incontinence 3 and 12 months after vaginal or cesarean delivery of twins: Part I. Int Urogynecol J 30, 881–891 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3774-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3774-4

Keywords