Review of enhanced recovery programs in benign gynecologic surgery

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Enhanced recovery programs (ERPs) are evidence-based protocols designed to improve functional rehabilitation after surgery. ERPs have gained widespread acceptance in many surgical disciplines, and their use leads to significant improvements in patient outcomes while reducing hospital length of stay (LOS). There remains a paucity of data on the use of ERPs in benign gynecologic surgery. The purpose of this review was to evaluate current literature on the use of ERP concepts in benign gynecologic surgery.

Methods

A systematic search of PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and the Cochrane databases was conducted, cross-referencing search terms related to gynecologic surgery and ERP concepts. The search was limited to publications available in English. Studies published prior to 2000, and those involving gynecologic oncology, nonadult patients, and outpatient surgery were excluded.

Results

Nine studies were included in the analysis. Due to heterogeneity of the included studies, no statistical pooling was possible and comparison between studies was limited to their respective themes. Primary study outcomes included LOS, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), pain management, patient satisfaction, and hospital costs. Five studies investigated ERPs, two evaluated measures to improve PONV, and four focused on unique aspects of pain management. Across the studies, ERPs that focused on the patients’ basic symptoms and recovery were found to have equal, if not better, outcomes than standard practice.

Conclusions

This integrative review supports the implementation of ERPs in benign gynecologic surgery. The results showed that the use of ERPs decreased LOS, improved pain scores, and reduced hospital costs, without increasing perioperative complications. We suggest additional randomized controlled trials of ERP concepts in benign gynecologic surgery to support their more widespread use and application.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. 1.

    American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease. Committee Opinion No. 701. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129:e155–9

  2. 2.

    Kehlet H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth. 1997;78:606–17.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Chapman J, Roddy E, Ueda S, Brooks R, Chen L, Chen L. Enhanced recovery pathways for improving outcomes after minimally invasive gynecologic oncology surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(1):138–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Thiele R, Rea K, Turrentine F, Friel C, Hassinger T, Goudreau B, et al. Standardization of care: impact of an enhanced recovery protocol on length of stay, complications, and direct costs after colorectal surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;220(4):430–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    de Groot J, Maesen J, Slangen B, Winkens B, Dirksen C, van der Weijden T. A stepped strategy that aims at the nationwide implementation of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery programme in major gynaecological surgery: study protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial. Implement Sci. 2015;10:106.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Kalogera E, Bakkum-Gamez J, Jankowski C, Trabuco E, Lovely J, Dhanorker S, et al. Enhanced recovery in gynecologic surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(2 Part 1):319–28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Nelson G, Altman A, Nick A, Meyer L, Ramirez P, Achtari C, et al. Guidelines for pre- and intra-operative care in gynecologic/oncology surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations – Part I. Gynecol Oncol. 2016;140:313–22.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Pedziwiatr M, Kisialeuski M, Wierdak M, Stanek M, Natkaniec M, Matłok M, et al. Early implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) protocol – compliance improves outcomes: a prospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 2015;21:75–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Raman J, Leveson N, Samost AL, Dobrilovic N, Oldham M, Dekker S, et al. When a checklist is not enough: how to improve them and what else is needed. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;152(2):585–92. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.01.022.

  10. 10.

    Pauls R, Crisp C, Oakley S, Westermann L, Mazloomdoost D, Kleeman S, et al. Effects of dexamethasone on quality of recovery following vaginal surgery: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;718:1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Ravndal C, Vandrevala T. Preemptive local anesthetic in gynecologic laparoscopy and postoperative movement-evoked pain: a randomized trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016;23:775–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Wodlin N, Nilsson L, Arestedt K, Kjolhede P. Mode of anesthesia and postoperative symptoms following abdominal hysterectomy in a fast-track setting. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011;90:369–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Xiromeritis P, Kalogiannidis I, Papadopoulos E, Prapas N, Prapas Y. Improved recovery using multimodal perioperative analgesia in minimally invasive myomectomy: a randomised study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;51:301–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    de Lapasse C, Rabischong B, Bolandard F, Canis M, Botchorischvili R, Jardon K, et al. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy and early discharge: satisfaction and feasibility study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15:20–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Dickson E, Argenta P, Reichert J. Results of introducing a rapid recovery program from total abdominal hysterectomy. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2012;73:21–5. doi:10.1159/000328713.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Yoong W, Sivashanmugarajan V, Relph S, Bell A, Fajemirokun E, Davies T, et al. Can enhanced recovery pathways improve outcomes of vaginal hysterectomy? Cohort control study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21(1):83–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Ottesen M, Sorensen M, Rasmussen Y, Smidt-Jensen S, Kehlet H, Ottesen B. Fast track vaginal surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002;81:138–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Kroon U, Radstromb M, Hjelthea C, Dahlinc C, Kroon L. Fast-track hysterectomy: a randomised, controlled study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;151:203–7.

  19. 19.

    The Joanna Briggs Institute. Reviewers’ Manual, 2014 edition. Adelaide: Joanna Briggs Institute, University of Adelaide; 2014.

  20. 20.

    Chatterjee S, Rudra A, Sengupta S. Current concepts in the Management of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting. Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2011;2011:748031. doi:10.1155/2011/748031.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Smith G, Durieux M, Bhiken N. Trends of intraoperative opioid and non-opioid analgesic use at an academic tertiary care hospital over a four-year period. Poster session presented at the PostGraduate Assembly in Anesthesiology (PGA70), 2016, New York, NY.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elisa R. Trowbridge.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None

Appendices

Appendix 1

Table 6 Logic grid of initial search terms

Appendix 2: Example search – PubMed

(“Gynecologic Surgical Procedures”[MeSH] OR “Gynecologic Surgeries”[All Fields] OR “gynecologic surgery”[All Fields] OR “Gynaecologic surgical procedures”[All Fields] OR “hysterectomy”[MeSH] OR “hysterectomy”[All Fields] OR “uterine myomectomy”[MeSH Terms] OR “uterine myomectomy”[All Fields] OR “myomectomy”[All Fields] OR “sterilization reversal”[All Fields] OR “sterilization reversal”[MeSH Terms] OR (“sterilization”[All Fields] AND “reversal”[All Fields]) OR “sterilization reversal”[All Fields] OR “ovariectomy”[MeSH Terms] OR “ovariectomy”[All Fields] OR “oophorectomy”[All Fields] OR sacrocolpopexy[All Fields] OR “vesicovaginal fistula”[MeSH Terms] OR “vesicovaginal”[All Fields] OR “menorrhagia”[MeSH Terms] OR “menorrhagia”[All Fields] OR “metrorrhagia”[MeSH Terms] OR “metrorrhagia”[All Fields] OR “leiomyoma”[MeSH Terms] OR “leiomyoma”[All Fields] OR “fibroid”[All Fields] OR fibroid’s[All Fields] OR “endometriosis”[MeSH Terms] OR “endometriosis”[All Fields] OR “adenomyosis”[MeSH Terms] OR “adenomyosis”[All Fields] OR ((“uterus”[MeSH Terms] OR “uterus”[All Fields] OR “vagina”[MeSH Terms] OR “vagina”[All Fields] OR “vaginal”[All Fields]) AND (“prolapse”[MeSH Terms] OR “prolapse”[All Fields])) OR ((“pelvis”[MeSH Terms] OR “pelvis”[All Fields] OR “pelvic”[All Fields]) AND (“pain”[MeSH Terms] OR “pain”[All Fields])) OR ((“ovary”[MeSH Terms] OR “ovary”[All Fields] OR ovarian[All Fields]) AND (“cysts”[MeSH Terms] OR “cysts”[All Fields])) OR ((tubal[All Fields] OR tubular[All Fields] OR tube[All Fields]) AND reanastomosis[All Fields]) OR ((“Gynecology”[Mesh] OR “gynecology”[All Fields] OR “gynecology”[All Fields] OR gynecologic[All Fields] OR “gynecological”[All Fields] OR gynaecologic[All Fields] OR gynecological[All Fields]) AND (“disease”[MeSH Terms] OR “disease”[All Fields] OR “diseases”[All Fields] OR “disorder”[All Fields] OR “disorders”[All Fields] AND benign[All Fields]))) AND ((ERAS[tiab] OR “enhanced recovery after surgery”[All Fields] OR “enhanced recovery”[All Fields]) OR ((enhanced[All Fields] OR early[All Fields] OR accelerated[All Fields] OR rapid[All Fields] OR “fast track”[All Fields] OR “fast-track”[All Fields]) AND (recovery[All Fields] OR recovers[All Fields] OR recovering[All Fields] OR “rehabilitation”[MeSH Terms] OR “rehabilitation”[All Fields] OR “convalescence”[MeSH Terms] OR “convalescence”[All Fields] OR “convalesced”[All Fields] OR “convalescent”[All Fields] OR “convalescents”[All Fields] OR “mobile”[All Fields] OR “mobilization”[All Fields] OR “ambulate”[All Fields] OR “ambulation”[All Fields] OR “ambulatory”[All Fields] OR “ambulating”[All Fields] OR “walking”[MeSH Terms] OR “walking”[All Fields] OR “walk”[All Fields] OR “walks”[All Fields] OR “feeding behavior”[MeSH Terms] OR “feeding”[All Fields] OR “feed”[All Fields] OR “feeds”[All Fields] OR “nutrition”[All Fields] OR “eat”[All Fields] OR “eats”[All Fields] OR “eating”[All Fields])) AND ((((“surgery”[Subheading] OR “surgery”[All Fields] OR “surgical procedures, operative”[MeSH Terms]) OR protocol[All Fields]) OR pathway[All Fields] OR “Critical Pathways”[MeSH] OR “clinical protocols”[MeSH]) OR ((((“perioperative care”[MeSH Terms] OR “Perioperative Care”[All Fields]) OR “preoperative care”[MeSH Terms]) OR “Preoperative Care”[All Fields]) OR “Length of Stay”[MeSH] OR “Length of Stay”[All Fields]))) AND English[lang].

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Trowbridge, E.R., Dreisbach, C.N., Sarosiek, B.M. et al. Review of enhanced recovery programs in benign gynecologic surgery. Int Urogynecol J 29, 3–11 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3442-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Benign gynecology
  • Enhanced recovery after surgery
  • Enhanced recovery programs
  • Fast track surgery