Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Suburethral sling procedures in the United States: complications, readmission, and reoperation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Hospital readmission is increasingly used as a measure of quality care. Our objective was to evaluate the rate of readmission and associated factors in women undergoing suburethral sling placement in the USA.

Methods

This is a cohort study of suburethral sling procedures performed in the USA from 2012 to 2014 using the American College of Surgeons’ National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. The database was queried for suburethral sling procedures. Records were excluded if concomitant surgery had been performed. Patient and surgical characteristics were evaluated for association with readmission using Chi-squared test for categorical variables and Student’s t test for continuous variables. All results yielding p < 0.05 were deemed statistically significant.

Results

A total of 7,117 suburethral sling procedures were identified. There were 83 (1.16%) hospital readmissions. Those who were readmitted tended to be older (p = 0.011), non-Hispanic (p = 0.04), smokers (p < 0.001), and have an American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System score of 3 or 4 (p = 0.001). A history of bleeding disorder (p < 0.001), congestive heart failure (p < 0.001), or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p < 0.001) was associated with readmission. Fifty-four (0.75%) patients underwent reoperation within 30 days of suburethral sling placement. The most common reoperation procedure was sling excision (20 patients). The most common complication was urinary tract infection, which occurred in 189 patients (2.7%).

Conclusions

Suburethral sling placement is a safe procedure with a low rate of readmissions, reoperations, and complications. Consistent with other types of surgery, infection is the most common post-operative complication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. QualityNet. Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program Overview. https://www.qualitynet.org/dcs/ContentServer?c=Page&pagename=QnetPublic%2FPage%2FQnetTier2&cid=1228772412458. Accessed 1 November 2016.

  2. Nguyen JN, Jakus-Waldman SM, Walter AJ, White T, Menefee SA. Perioperative complications and reoperations after incontinence and prolapse surgeries using prosthetic implants. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119(3):539–46. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22353951.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Barber MD, Gustilo-Ashby AM, Chen CCG, Kaplan P, Paraiso MFR, Walters MD. Perioperative complications and adverse events of the MONARC transobturator tape, compared with the tension-free vaginal tape. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195(6):1820–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brubaker L, Norton PA, Albo ME, et al. Adverse events over two years after retropubic or transobturator midurethral sling surgery: findings from the Trial of Midurethral Slings (TOMUS) study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205(5):498.e1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kuuva N, Nilsson CG. A nationwide analysis of complications associated with the tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) procedure. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002;81:72–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sultana CJ, Campbell JW, Pisanelli WS, Sivinski L, Rimm AA. Morbidity and mortality of incontinence surgery in elderly women: an analysis of Medicare data. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;176(2):344–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Merkow RP, Ju MH, Chung JW, et al. Underlying reasons associated with hospital readmission following surgery in the United States. JAMA. 2015;313(5):483–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Erekson EA, Lopes VV, Raker CA, Sung VW. Ambulatory procedures for female pelvic floor disorders in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(5):497.e1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. American College of Surgeons AC. User Guide for the 2014 ACS NSQIP Participant Use Data File (PUF). 2014. https://www.facs.org/~/media/files/qualityprograms/nsqip/nsqip_puf_userguide_2014.ashx.

  10. American College of Surgeons. ACS NSQIP Hospitals. https://www.facs.org/search/nsqip-participants?allresults.

  11. American College of Surgeons. About ACS NSQIP. https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/acs-nsqip/about.

  12. Davé BA, Jaber C, Leader-Cramer A, et al. Effect of anesthesia type on perioperative outcomes with a midurethral sling. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(9):1327–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the hospitals participating in the ACS NSQIP are the source of the data used herein; they have not verified and are not responsible for the statistical validity of the data analysis or the conclusions derived by the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katie Propst.

Ethics declarations

Financial support

None.

Conflicts of interest

Katie Propst: currently receiving clinical research grant from the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (grant is unrelated to the current work).

David M. O’Sullivan and Paul K. Tulikangas: no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Propst, K., O’Sullivan, D.M. & Tulikangas, P.K. Suburethral sling procedures in the United States: complications, readmission, and reoperation. Int Urogynecol J 28, 1463–1467 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3293-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3293-8

Keywords

Navigation