Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Tissue-engineering with muscle fiber fragments improves the strength of a weak abdominal wall in rats

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Alternative approaches to reinforce the native tissue in patients with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) are needed to improve surgical outcome. Our aims were to develop a weakened abdominal wall in a rat model to mimic the weakened vaginal wall in women with POP and then evaluate the regenerative potential of a quickly biodegradable synthetic scaffold, methoxypolyethylene glycol polylactic-co-glycolic acid (MPEG-PLGA), seeded with autologous muscle fiber fragments (MFFs) using this model.

Methods

In an initial pilot study with 15 animals, significant weakening of the abdominal wall and a feasible technique was established by creating a partial defect with removal of one abdominal muscle layer. Subsequently, 18 rats were evenly divided into three groups: (1) unrepaired partial defect; (2) partial defect repaired with MPEG-PLGA; (3) partial defect repaired with MPEG-PLGA and MFFs labeled with PKH26-fluorescence dye. After 8 weeks, we performed histopathological and immunohistochemical testing, fluorescence analysis, and uniaxial biomechanical testing.

Results

Both macroscopically and microscopically, the MPEG-PLGA scaffold was fully degraded, with no signs of an inflammatory or foreign-body response. PKH26-positive cells were found in all animals from the group with added MFFs. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed a significant difference between groups with respect to load at failure (p = 0.028), and post hoc testing revealed that the group with MPEG-PLGA and MFFs showed a significantly higher strength than the group with MPEG-PLGA alone (p = 0.034).

Conclusion

Tissue-engineering with MFFs seeded on a scaffold of biodegradable MPEG-PLGA might be an interesting adjunct to future POP repair.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

POP:

Pelvic organ prolapse

MFFs:

Muscle fiber fragments

MPEG-PLGA:

Methoxypolyethylene glycol polylactic-co-glycolic acid

SD:

Standard deviation

References

  1. Bianco P, Robey PG. Stem cells in tissue engineering. Nature. 2001;414:118–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lysaght MJ, Hazlehurst AL. Tissue engineering: the end of the beginning. Tissue Eng. 2004;10:309–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Boennelycke M, Gras S, Lose G. Tissue engineering as a potential alternative or adjunct to surgical reconstruction in treating pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24:741–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Roman S, Mangera A, Osman NI, Bullock AJ, Chapple CR, MacNeil S. Developing a tissue engineered repair material for treatment of stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse-which cell source? Neurourol Urodyn. 2014;33:531–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen B, Dave B. Challenges and future prospects for tissue engineering in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery. Curr Urol Rep. 2014;15:425.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ulrich D, Muralitharan R, Gargett CE. Toward the use of endometrial and menstrual blood mesenchymal stem cells for cell-based therapies. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2013;13:1387–400.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mauro A. Satellite cell of skeletal muscle fibers. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1961;9:493–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Boennelycke M, Christensen L, Nielsen LF, Gräs S, Lose G. Fresh muscle fiber fragments on a scaffold in rats-a new concept in urogynecology? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205:235.e10–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gräs S, Klarskov N, Lose G. Intraurethral injection of autologous minced skeletal muscle: a simple surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2014;192:850–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jangö H, Gräs S, Christensen L, Lose G. Muscle fragments on a scaffold in rats: a potential regenerative strategy in urogynecology. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26:1843–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen B, Yeh J. Alterations in connective tissue metabolism in stress incontinence and prolapse. J Urol. 2011;186:1768–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Feola A, Duerr R, Moalli P, Abramowitch S. Changes in the rheological behavior of the vagina in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2013;24:1221–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Valentin JE, Turner NJ, Gilbert TW, Badylak SF. Functional skeletal muscle formation with a biologic scaffold. Biomaterials. 2010;31:7475–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Fearon A, Dahlstrom JE, Twin J, Cook J, Scott A. The Bonar score revisited: region of evaluation significantly influences the standardized assessment of tendon degeneration. J Sci Med Sport Sports Med Aust. 2014;17:346–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Feola A, Abramowitch S, Jallah Z, Stein S, Barone W, Palcsey S, et al. Deterioration in biomechanical properties of the vagina following implantation of a high-stiffness prolapse mesh. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;120:224–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jones KA, Feola A, Meyn L, Abramowitch SD, Moalli PA. Tensile properties of commonly used prolapse meshes. Int Urogynecol J. 2009;20:847–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Corona BT, Garg K, Ward CL, McDaniel JS, Walters TJ, Rathbone CR. Autologous minced muscle grafts: a tissue engineering therapy for the volumetric loss of skeletal muscle. AJP Cell Physiol. 2013;305:C761–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Garg K, Ward CL, Rathbone CR, Corona BT. Transplantation of devitalized muscle scaffolds is insufficient for appreciable de novo muscle fiber regeneration after volumetric muscle loss injury. Cell Tissue Res. 2014;358:857–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Corona BT, Wu X, Ward CL, McDaniel JS, Rathbone CR, Walters TJ. The promotion of a functional fibrosis in skeletal muscle with volumetric muscle loss injury following the transplantation of muscle-ECM. Biomaterials. 2013;34:3324–35. Elsevier Ltd.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hanna Jangö.

Ethics declarations

Financial disclaimers

The Danish National Advanced Technology Foundation and the Nordic Urogynecological Association have supported this study. Coloplast A/S provided scaffolds and facilities for biomechanical and histological testing.

Conflicts of interest

G. Lose has received compensation as a consultant for Astellas. H. Jangö, S. Gräs, and L. Christensen have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Some preliminary results were presented at the 29th Bi-Annual Meeting of Nordic Urogynecological Association 29–31 January 2015, Stockholm, Sweden

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jangö, H., Gräs, S., Christensen, L. et al. Tissue-engineering with muscle fiber fragments improves the strength of a weak abdominal wall in rats. Int Urogynecol J 28, 223–229 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3091-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3091-8

Keywords

Navigation