References
Sagi-Dain L, Sagi S (2015) The correct episiotomy: does it exist? A cross-sectional survey of four public Israeli hospitals and review of the literature. Int Urogynecol J 26:1213–1219
Olayinka Oyelese K, Porter A, Wai C (2000) Midline episiotomy and anal incontinence. Is episiotomy ethically acceptable ? BMJ 320(7249):1602
Cescon C et al (2014) Characterization of the motor units of the external anal sphincter in pregnant women with multichannel surface EMG. Int Urogynecol J 25:1097–1103
Cescon C et al (2014) Effect of vaginal delivery on external anal sphincter muscle innervation pattern evaluated with multichannel surface EMG (Results of the multicenter study TASI-2). Int Urogynecol J 25:1491–1499
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
An author’s reply to this comment is available at doi:10.1007/s00192-015-2882-7.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Merletti, R., Riva, D., Cescon, C. et al. The correct episiotomy: Does it exist?. Int Urogynecol J 27, 161–162 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2879-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2879-2