Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Successful use of ring pessary with support for advanced pelvic organ prolapse

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Support pessaries are not recommended for patients with advanced prolapse. This study aimed to explore the efficacy of the ring pessary with support for the treatment of advanced pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

Methods

We conducted this prospective study on pessary fittings performed between November 2013 and September 2014 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), Beijing. A total of 109 patients with stage III or IV POP completed a detailed history. A successful fitting was defined as the continued use of the device for over 3 months from the initial fitting. Data were analyzed with the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, independent sample t tests, continuity correction χ2 tests, and Fisher’s exact test.

Results

A total of 74.3 % (81/109) of the patients were successfully fitted with the ring pessary with support at the initial visit. Among those women with a successful initial fitting, the failure rate was less than 10 % (8/81) at 3 months. Furthermore, 82.7 % (67/81) of the patients were able to manage the pessary by themselves. Seven patients experienced vaginal erosion. There was no association of prolapse stage and the predominant prolapse compartment with pessary trial outcome. The average vaginal length of the patients with successful pessary use was 7.58 cm.

Conclusions

The ring pessary with support was successfully fitted in patients with advanced POP with a high success rate and few complications. Older patients were more likely to prefer the ring pessary with support due to its convenient use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. DeLancey JOL (2005) The hidden epidemic of pelvic floor dysfunction: achievable goals for improved prevention and treatment. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:1488–1495. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2005.02.028

  2. Nygaard I, Barber MD, Burgio KL, Kenton K, Meikle S, Schaffer J, Spimo C, Whitehead WE, Wu J, Brody DJ et al (2008) Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. JAMA 300:1311–1316. doi:10.1001/jama.300.11.1311

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cundiff GW, Weidner AC, Visco AG, Bump RC, Addision WA (2000) A survey of pessary use by members of the American Urogynecologic Society. Obstet Gynecol 95:931–935. doi:10.1016/S0029-7844(00)00788-2

  4. Jones KA, Harmanli OZ (2010) Pessary use in pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Rev Obstet Gynecol 3:3–9. doi:10.3909/riog0110

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Weber AM, Richter HE (2005) Pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 106:615–634. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000175832.13266.bb

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bø K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JOL, Klarskov P, Shull BL, Smith ARB (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:10–17. doi:10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70243-0

  7. Fernando RJ, Sultan AH, Thakar R, Jeyanthan K (2007) Management of the neglected vaginal ring pessary. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18:117–119. doi:10.1007/s00192-006-0089-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Arias BE, Ridgeway B, Barber MD (2008) Complications of neglected vaginal pessaries: case presentation and literature review. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19:1173–1178. doi:10.1007/s00192-008-0574-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wu V, Farrell SA, Baskett TF, Flowerdew G (1997) A simplified protocol for pessary management. Obstet Gynecol 90:990–994. doi:10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00481-X

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sulak PJ, Kuehl TJ, Shull BL (1993) Vaginal pessaries and their use in pelvic relaxation. J Reprod Med 38:919–923. doi:10.1097/0006254-199404000-00018

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Handa VL, Jones M (2002) Do pessaries prevent the progression of pelvic organ prolapse? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 13:349–352. doi:10.1007/s001920200078

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kapoor DS, Thakar R, Sultan AH, Oliver R (2009) Conservative versus surgical management of prolapse: what dictates patient choice? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20:1157–1161. doi:10.1007/s00192-009-0930-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Brincat C, Kenton K, Pat Fitzgerald M, Brubaker L (2004) Sexual activity predicts continued pessary use. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191:198–200. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2004.03.083

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Heit M, Rosenquist C, Culligan P, Graham C, Murphy M, Shott S (2003) Predicting treatment choice for patients with pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 101:1279–1284. doi:10.1016/S0029-7844(03)00359-4

  15. Powers K, Lazarou G, Wang A, Lacombe J, Bensigner G, Greston WM, Mikhail MS (2006) Pessary use in advanced pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17:160–164. doi:10.1007/s00192-005-1311-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Clemons JL, Aguilar VC, Tillinghast TA, Jackson ND, Myers DL (2004) Risk factors associated with an unsuccessful pessary fitting trial in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190:345–350. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2003.08.034

  17. Nguyen JN, Jones CR (2005) Pessary treatment of pelvic relaxation: factors affecting successful fitting and continued use. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 32:255–261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Maito JM, Quam ZA, Craig E, Danner KA, Rogers RG (2006) Predictors of successful pessary fitting and continued use in a nurse-midwifery pessary clinic. J Midwifery Womens Health 51:78–84. doi:10.1016/j.jmwh.2005.09.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mutone MF, Terry C, Hale DS, Benson JT (2005) Factors which influence the short-term success of pessary management of pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193:89–94. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.012

  20. Fernando RJ, Thakar R, Sultan AH, Shah SM, Jones PW (2006) Effect of vaginal pessaries on symptoms associated with pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 108:93–99. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000222903.38684.cc

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nager CW, Richter HE, Nygaard L, Paraiso MF, Wu JM, Kenton K, Atnip SD, Spino C et al (2009) Incontinence pessaries: size, POPQ measures, and successful fitting. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20:1023–1028. doi:10.1007/s00192-009-0866-1

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Markle D, Skoczylas L, Goldsmith C, Noblett K (2011) Patient characteristics associated with a successful pessary fitting. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 17:249–252. doi:10.1097/SPV.0b013e31822f00ae

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yamada T, Matsubara S (2011) Rectocele, but not cystocele, may predict unsuccessful pessary fitting. J Obstet Gynaecol 31:441–442. doi:10.3109/01443615.2011.577253

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank all of the patients for agreeing to participate in our study.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lan Zhu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ding, J., Chen, C., Song, Xc. et al. Successful use of ring pessary with support for advanced pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 26, 1517–1523 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2738-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2738-1

Keywords

Navigation