Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

TVT versus laparoscopic mesh colposuspension: 5-year follow-up results of a randomized clinical trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Before the introduction of the tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) procedure for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence, the colposuspension operation was regarded as the “gold standard” procedure. The laparoscopic variant of the colposuspension was introduced as a less invasive operation. The aim of the present trial was to compare the new minimally invasive TVT procedure with laparoscopic mesh colposuspension (LCM).

Methods

A multicenter randomized clinical trial conducted in six public hospitals in Finland including primary cases of stress incontinence. Objective treatment success criteria were a negative stress test and no retreatment for stress incontinence. Patient satisfaction was assessed by Patients Global Impression of Improvement, a visual analog scale, and the Urinary Incontinence Severity Score.

Results

Of 128 randomized patients, 121 underwent the allocated operation. At the 5-year follow-up 77 % in the TVT group and 84 % in the LCM group could be assessed according to the protocol. The objective cure rate was significantly higher in the TVT group (94 %) than in the LCM group (78 %). Subjective treatment satisfaction (completely satisfied with the procedure) was significantly higher in the TVT group (64 %) than in the LCM group (51 %).

Conclusions

By per protocol analysis both objective and subjective cure rates were significantly higher in the TVT group than in the LCM group. If cases that were lost to follow-up were regarded as failures, the intension-to-treat analysis found no difference between the groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ulmsten U, Henriksson L, Johnson P et al (1996) An ambulatory surgical procedure under local anesthesia for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 7:81–85, discussion 85–86

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kjolhede P, Ryden G (1994) Prognostic factors and long-term results of the Burch colposuspension. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 73:642–647

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kinn AC (1995) Burch colposuspension for stress urinary incontinence. 5-year results in 153 women. Scand J Urol Nephrol 29(4):449–455

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Alcalay M, Monga M, Stanton SL (1995) Burch colposuspension: a 10–20 year follow up. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 102:740–745

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Meltomaa S, Haarala M, Taalikka M, Kiilholma P, Alanen A, Mäkinen J (2001) Outcome of Burch retropubic urethropexy and the effect of concomitant abdominal hysterectomy: a prospective long-term follow-up study. Int Urogynecol J 12:3–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kulseng-Hanssen S, Berild GH (2002) Subjective and objective incontinence 5 to 10 years after Burch colposuspension. Neurourol Urodyn 21:100–105

  7. Ward K, Hilton P (2008) on behalf of the UK And Ireland TVT Trial Group. Tension-free vaginal tape versus colposuspension for primary urodynamic stress incontinence: 5-year follow up. BJOG 115:226–233

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dean NM, Ellis G, Wilson PD, Herbison GP (2006) Laparoscopic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3, CD002239

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jelovsek J, Barber M, Karram M, Walters M, Paraiso M (2008) Randomised trial of laparoscopic Burch colposuspension versus tension-free vaginal tape: long-term follow up. BJOG 115:219–225

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Valpas A, Kivelä A, Penttinen J, Kauko M, Kujansuu E, Tomas E, Haarala M, Meltomaa S, Nilsson C-G (2003) Tension-free vaginal tape and laparoscopic mesh colposuspension in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: immediate outcome and complications—a randomized clinical trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 82:665–671

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Valpas A, Kivelä A, Penttinen J, Kujansuu E, Haarala M, Nilsson C-G (2004) Tension-free vaginal tape and laparoscopic mesh colposuspension for stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 104(1):42–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stach-Lempinen B, Kujansuu E, Laippala P, Metsäoja R (2001) Visual analogue scale, Urinary Incontinence Severity Score and 15 D—psychometric testing of three different health-related quality-of-life instruments for urinary incontinent women. Scand J Urol Nephrol 35:476–483

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Liang KY, Zeger SL (1986) Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 73:13–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM et al (2010) An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J 21:5–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kuuva N, Nilsson CG (2002) A nationwide analysis of complications associated with the tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) procedure. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 81:72–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Laurikainen E, Valpas A, Aukee P, Kivelä A, Rinne K, Takala T, Nilsson CG (2014) Five years results of a randomized trial comparing retropubic and transobturator midurethral slings for stress incontinence. Eur Urol 65:1109–1114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bergman A, Elia G (1995) Three surgical procedures for genuine stress incontinence: five year follow-up of a prospective randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 173:67–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kitchener HC, Dunn G, Lawton V, Reid F, Nelson L, Smith ARB (2006) Laparoscopic versus open colposuspension—results of a prospective randomized controlled trial. BJOG 113:1007–1013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tan E, Tekkis PP, Cornish J, Teoh TG, Darzi AW, Khullar V (2007) Laparoscopic versus open colposuspension for urodynamic stress incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 26(2):158–169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lapitan MC, Cody JD (2012) Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 6:CD002912

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Barr S, Reid FM, North CE, Hosker G, Smith AR (2009) The long-term outcome of laparoscopic colposuspension: a 10-year cohort study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20:443–445

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hong JH, Choo MS, Lee KS (2009) Long-term results of laparoscopic Burch colposuspension for stress urinary incontinence in women. J Korean Med Sci 24:1182–1186

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nilsson CG, Palva K, Rezapour M, Falconer C (2008) Eleven years prospective follow-up of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 19:1043–1047

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Olsson I, Abrahamsson AK, Kroon UB (2010) Long-term efficacy of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for the treatment of urinary incontinence: a retrospective follow-up 11.5 years postoperatively. Int Urogynecol J 21:679–683

  25. Svenningsen R, Staff AC, Schoetz HA, Western K, Kulseng-Hanssen S (2013) Long-term follow-up of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure. Int Urogynecol J 24:1271–1278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nilsson CG, Palva K, Aarnio R, Morcos E, Falconer C (2013) Seventeen years’ follow-up of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for female stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 24:1265–1269

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ankardal M, Milsom I, Stjerndahl JH, Engh ME (2005) A three-armed randomized trial comparing open Burch colposuspension using sutures with laparoscopic colposuspension using sutures and laparoscopic colposuspension using mesh and staples in women with stress urinary incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 84:773–779

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

A. Valpas, S. Ala-Nissilä, and E. Tomas: none; C.G. Nilsson: travel expenses and honoraria, consultant for Astellas.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. G. Nilsson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Valpas, A., Ala-Nissilä, S., Tomas, E. et al. TVT versus laparoscopic mesh colposuspension: 5-year follow-up results of a randomized clinical trial. Int Urogynecol J 26, 57–63 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2454-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2454-2

Keywords

Navigation