Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A retrospective study on telephone follow-up of anterior colporrhaphy by a specialized nurse

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The aim of the study was to evaluate a new follow-up practice after anterior colporrhaphy for central cystocele involving nurse telephone follow-up.

Methods

A retrospective follow-up of all 84 patients with an anterior colporrhaphy operation during 2011 was performed. Standard postoperative procedure in uncomplicated cases of cystocele operation (first-time cystocele operation, no preoperative incontinence or voiding difficulties, and no immediate postoperative complications) was a telephone interview performed by a continence nurse 3 months after patient surgery. A local checklist comprising questions concerning complications, voiding dysfunction, and sexual life, as well as questions from the International Consultation on Incontinence Vaginal Symptoms (ICIQ-VS) and the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) were used. Complex cases were followed by the surgeon with a consultation including gynecological examination after 3 months.

Results

Out of 84 patients with a cystocele operation, 59 were uncomplicated and had a telephone follow-up. Forty-four (75 %) were satisfied and needed no further consultation in the hospital. One patient could not be contacted. Fourteen patients had a consultation, three before the telephone consultation because of bleeding, five because of anxiety, and one each because of voiding dysfunction and prolapse symptoms. Four patients had persisting urinary incontinence and were incorrectly scheduled for a telephone interview.

Conclusions

Selecting uncomplicated cases for a nurse telephone follow-up after cystocele operation is feasible in a majority of cases. This allows doctors to see more new patients and focus on difficult cases, as well as saving time and money.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

POP:

Pelvic organ prolapse

ICIQ-VS:

International Consultation on Incontinence Vaginal Symptoms

ICIQ-SF:

International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form

RCTs:

Randomized controlled trials

References

  1. Thompson-Coon J, Abdul-Rahman AK, Whear R, Bethel A, Vaidya B, Gericke CA et al (2013) Telephone consultations in place of face to face out-patient consultations for patients discharged from hospital following surgery: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 13:128

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Adams EJ, Hagen S, Glazener CM (2013) Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4, CD004014

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Abrams P, Avery K, Gardener N, Donovan J (2006) The International Consultation on Incontinence Modular Questionnaire: www.iciq.net. J Urol 175(3):1063–1066

  4. Price N, Jackson SR, Avery K, Brookes ST, Abrams P (2006) Development and psychometric evaluation of the ICIQ vaginal symptoms questionnaire: the ICIQ-VS. BJOG 113(6):700–712

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yalcin I, Bump RC (2003) Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:98–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Avery K, Donnovan J, Peters TJ, Shaw C, Gotoh M, Abrams P (2004) A brief and robust measure for evaluating the symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 23:322–330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Guldberg R, Brostrøm S, Hansen JK, Kærlev L, Gradel KO, Nørgård BM, Kesmodel US (2013) The danish urogynecological database: establishment, completeness and validity. Int Urogynecol J 24:983–990

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Barber MD, Brubaker L, Nygaard I, Wheeler TL, Schaffer J, Chen Z, Spino C (2009) Defining success after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 114:600–609

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vistad I, Moy BW, Salvesen HB, Liavaag AH (2011) Follow-up routines in gynecological cancer – time for a change? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 90:707–718

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gray RT, Sut MK, Badger SA, Harvey CF (2010) Post-operative telephone review is cost-effective and acceptable to patients. Ulster Med J 13(2):76–79

    Google Scholar 

  11. Beaver K, Williamson S, Chalmers K (2010) Telephone follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: views and experiences of patients and specialist breast care nurses. J Clin Nurs 19:2916–2924

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kimman ML, Bloebaum MM, Dirksen CD, Houben RM, Lambin P, Boersma LJ (2010) Patient satisfaction with nurse-led telephone follow-up after curative treatment for breast cancer. BMC Cancer 10:174

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Glavind K, Bjørk J (2013) Follow-up of the tension-free vaginal tape operation in everyday practice. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 92:349–351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bateman AG, Neilens H, Gericke CA, George J, Freeman RM (2014) Is there a need for postoperative follow-up after routine urogynaecological procedures? patients will self-present if they have problems. Int Urogynecol J 25(3):381–386

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karin Glavind.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Glavind, K., Bjørk, J. & Lindquist, A.S.I. A retrospective study on telephone follow-up of anterior colporrhaphy by a specialized nurse. Int Urogynecol J 25, 1693–1697 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2444-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2444-4

Keywords

Navigation