Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Repair of complete urethral disruption due to synthetic sling complication

  • IUJ Video
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Urethral complications due to synthetic midurethral slings are rare. Possible causes may include unrecognized trocar injury, mesh implantation despite recognized injury, mesh contamination leading to inflammation and delayed perforation, and excessive sling tension. There is no consensus as to the surgical management of urethral complications with regard to how much mesh should be excised, whether an interposition flap should be used, and whether a pubovaginal sling should be placed at the time of surgery. The purpose of this video is to present a technique of repairing complete urethral disruption due to a synthetic midurethral sling complication.

Methods

In this video, we demonstrate the steps to perform primary end-to-end urethral reconstruction for repairing complete urethral disruption. Any residual synthetic mesh must first be excised, after which the anastomosis may be completed.

Results

Complete urethral disruption is a rare complication of synthetic midurethral sling surgery that can be repaired primarily with good results.

Conclusions

There is no consensus regarding surgical management of urethral complications caused by synthetic midurethral slings, and thus an individualized approach should be used based on patient presentation and surgeon expertise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Brubaker L, Norton PA, Albo ME (2011) Adverse events over two years after retropubic or transobturator midurethral sling surgery: findings from the Trial of Midurethral Slings (TOMUS) study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 205(5):498.e1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Amundsen CL, Flynn BJ, Webster GD (2003) Urethral erosion after synthetic and nonsynthetic pubovaginal slings: Difference in management and continence outcome. J Urol 170:134–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shah K, Nikolavsky D, Gilsdorf D et al (2013) Surgical management of lower urinary mesh perforation after midurethral polypropylene mesh sling: mesh excision, urinary tract reconstruction and concomitant pubovaginal sling with autologous rectus fascia. Int Urogynecol J 24(12):2111–2117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nitya Abraham.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

(MP4 43417 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abraham, N., Quirouet, A. & Vasavada, S. Repair of complete urethral disruption due to synthetic sling complication. Int Urogynecol J 25, 1279–1280 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2416-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2416-8

Keywords

Navigation