Skip to main content
Log in

Statistical justifications for interrater reliability of levator ani deficiency (LAD) assessment by 3D endovaginal ultrasonography: response to critique

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Rostaminia G, Manonai J, Leclaire E, Omoumi F, Marchiorlatti M, Quiroz LH, Shobeiri SA (2013) Interrater reliability of assessing levator ani deficiency with 360° 3D endovaginal ultrasound. Int Urogynecol J doi:10.1007/s00192-013-2286-5 (erratum: doi:10.1007/s00192-014-2336-7)

  2. Sabour S (2014) Interrater reliability of assessing levator ani deficiency with 360° 3D endovaginal ultrasound: mistake and misinterpretation in reliability analysis. Int Urogynecol J. doi:10.1007/s00192-014-2350-9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. A. Shobeiri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rostaminia, G., Machiorlatti, M., Omoumi, F. et al. Statistical justifications for interrater reliability of levator ani deficiency (LAD) assessment by 3D endovaginal ultrasonography: response to critique. Int Urogynecol J 25, 709–710 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2351-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2351-8

Keywords

Navigation