Abstract
The vaginal pessary is a safe and effective method for the correction of uterovaginal prolapse. Complications are uncommon, but include fistula formation. We report a case of fistulous communication between the ureter and vagina that developed in a patient who had had a pessary for more than 8 years. She initially presented with urinary retention secondary to complete procidentia and declined surgical intervention. The patient was not compliant with follow-up. Eventually, she was scheduled for a vaginal hysterectomy and pelvic floor reconstruction, during which the communicating tract was discovered between the ureter and vagina. Ultimate treatment involved stenting of the ureter and interval ureteroneocystostomy. Fistulae can develop between the ureter and the vagina in the case of procidentia and a retained pessary.
References
Sarma S, Ying T, Moore KH (2009) Long-term vaginal ring pessary use: discontinuation rates and adverse events. BJOG 116(13):1715–1721
Goldstein I, Gilbert JW, Tancer ML (1990) A vesicovaginal fistula and intravesical foreign body. Am J Obstet Gynecol 163(2):589–591
Russel JK (1961) The dangerous vaginal pessary. Br Med J 2:1595–1597
Alperin M, Khan A, Dubina E, Tarnay C, Wu N, Pashos CL, Anger JT (2013) Patterns of pessary care and outcomes for medicare beneficiaries with pelvic organ prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 19(3):142–147
Arias BE, Ridgeway B, Barber MD (2008) Complications of neglected vaginal pessaries: case presentation and literature review. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19(8):1173–1178
Molitor K (1961) [Ureterovaginal fistula caused by a forgotten pessary]. Dtsch Gesundheitsw 16:1980–1983
Conflicts of interest
None.
Consent
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dmitry, F., Ambereen, S. Ureterovaginal fistula linked to a retained pessary. Int Urogynecol J 25, 1283–1285 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2328-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2328-7