Female genital circumcision/mutilation: implications for female urogynaecological health


“Female genital circumcision” or “female genital mutilation”, as it is called more often, is an operation that is primarily carried out in Africa. Owing to migration, physicians are increasingly confronted with this issue in Western countries as well. A range of negative effects may result from this operation and this article aims to address consequences for female pelvic health. Special emphasis is placed on urogynaecological health consequences; in particular, on “voiding difficulties”, “recurrent urinary tract infections” and “vesicovaginal fistula”. All of these occur mostly in infibulated women, i.e. in women whose genitalia are sealed by the most severe form of circumcision. Some of the problems that may emerge as a result of the operation can be resolved by defibulation (i.e. surgical reopening of the sealed vulva). Female genital circumcision is a sensitive topic even in the area of research and reliable data are therefore scarce.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4


  1. 1.

    World Health Organisation (2011) An update on WHO’s work on female genital mutilation (FGM). http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2011/WHO_RHR_11.18_eng.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2013

  2. 2.

    Maier C (2003) Echo des Schweigens. Stimmen der Betroffenheit zur Genitalverstümmelung bei afrikanischen Immigrantinnen in Wien. Ethnologische Studie. [Echo of silence. Voices of women affected by female genital mutilation in an immigrant population in Vienna, Austria). Edition Roesler, Maria Enzersdorf

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Saharaso S (2008) Gibt es einen multikulturellen Feminismus? Ansätze zwischen Universalismus und Anti-Essenzialismus. (Is there a multicutural feminism? Aspects of universalism vs. anti-essentialism). In: Sauer B, Strasser S (eds) Zwangsfreiheiten. Multikulturalität und Feminismus [Forced freedom. Multiculturalism and feminism]. Südwind/Promedia, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Asefaw F (2008) Weibliche Genitalbeschneidung. Hintergründe, gesundheitliche Folgen und nachhaltige Prävention [Female genital mutilation. Background, health effects and prevention]. Ulrike Helmer Verlag, Königstein/Taunus

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Utz-Billing I, Kentenich H (2008) Female genital mutilation: an injury, physical and mental harm. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 29:225–229

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Nour NM (2004) Female genital cutting: clinical and cultural guidelines. Obstet Gynecol Surv 59:272–279

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Behrendt A, Moritz S (2005) Posttraumatic stress disorder and memory problems after female genital mutilation. Am J Psychiatry 162:1000–1002

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Nour NM, Michels KB, Bryant AE (2006) Defibulation to treat female genital cutting. Effect on symptoms and sexual function. Obstet Gynecol 108:55–60

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Rouzi AA, Al-Sibiani SA, Al-Mansouri NM, Al-Sinani NS, Al-Jahdali EA, Darhouse K (2012) Defibulation during vaginal delivery for women with type III female genital mutilation. Obstet Gynecol 120:98–103

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Awang NA, Viegas C, Viegas OAC (2004) Incomplete bladder emptying due to labial fusion in a pubertal girl: a delayed consequence of female circumcision. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 44:372–373

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Dirie MA, Lindmark G (1992) The risk of medical complications after female circumcision. East Afr Med J 69:479–482

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Teufel K (2012) Gesundheitsfolgen von weiblicher Beschneidung—Eine Pilotstudie in Österreich [Health effects of female genital mutilation. A pilot study in Austria]. Diploma thesis, Medical University of Vienna

  13. 13.

    Agugua NEN, Egwuatu VE (1982) Female circumcision: management of urinary complications. J Trop Pediatr 28:248–252

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Nour MN (2006) Urinary calculus associated with female genital cutting. Obstet Gynecol 107:520–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Knight R, Hotchin A, Bayley C, Grover S (1999) Female genital mutilation—experience of The Royal Women’s Hospital, Melbourne. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 39:50–54

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Browning A, Allsworth JE, Lewis Wall L (2010) The relationship between female genital cutting and obstetric fistula. Obstet Gynecol 115:578–583

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Essén B, Sjöberg NO, Gudmundsson E, Östergren PO, Lindqvist PG (2004) No association between female circumcision and prolonged labour: a case control study of immigrant women giving birth in Sweden. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 121:182–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Toubia N (1994) Female circumcision as a public health issue. N Engl J Med 331:712–716

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    WHO Study Group on Female Genital Mutilation and Obstetric Outcome (2006) Female genital mutilation and obstetric outcome: WHO collaborative prospective study in six African countries. Lancet 367:1835–1841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Schnüll P (2003) Weibliche Genitalverstümmelung in Afrika [Female genital mutilation in Africa]. In: Terre des Femmes (ed) Schnitt in die Seele. Weibliche Genitalverstümmelung—eine fundamentale Menschenrechtsverletzung [Terre des Femmes (ed) Cutting of the soul—a fundamental human rights abuse]. Mabuse-Verlag, Frankfurt am Main

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Caflisch M, Mirabaud M (2007) Verstümmelung des weiblichen Genitale (Female Genital Mutilation, FGM). Paediatrica 18:44–47

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest


Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katharina Teufel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Teufel, K., Dörfler, D.M. Female genital circumcision/mutilation: implications for female urogynaecological health. Int Urogynecol J 24, 2021–2027 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-013-2160-5

Download citation


  • Female genital mutilation
  • Female genital cutting
  • Health consequences
  • Urogynaecology