Does self-motivation improve success rates of pelvic floor muscle training in women with urinary incontinence in a secondary care setting?
Introduction and hypothesis
Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is the recommended first-line treatment for women with urinary incontinence (UI). Success rates are variable and dependent on a number of factors. The development of an incontinence treatment motivation questionnaire (ITMQ) provides us with a tool to assess patient self-motivation with respect to PFMT and UI. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of women’s self-motivation to perform PFMT on outcome.
Women with stress predominant UI completed an ITMQ and a 24-h pad test and then underwent a 12-week course of supervised PFMT. At the end of their treatment they completed a patient global impression of improvement questionnaire (PGI-I) and a second 24-h pad test. The PGI-I scores and the difference in pad test weight correlated with the ITMQ according to Spearman’s correlation coefficient.
Sixty-five women were recruited. Thirty-two (49 %) patients perceived themselves as having improved, 28 women (43 %) did not experience any change in symptoms and 5 women (8 %) felt that their symptoms deteriorated following treatment. When correlating the PGI-I with the ITMQ, 3 of the 5 domains: MQS1 (positive attitude for treatment; p = 0.003), MQS3 (frustration of living with incontinence; p = 0.002) and MQS4 (desire for treatment; p = 0.002) correlated significantly with outcome. Desire for treatment was the only domain to correlate with change in pad weight (p = 0.001).
Self-motivation is essential in order to determine improved success rates with PFMT.
KeywordsPelvic floor muscle training Incontinence treatment motivation questionnaire
- 1.Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, Monga A, Petri E, Rizk DE, Sand PK, Schaer GN (2010) An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J 21(1):5–26. ReviewPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Dumoulin C, Hay-Smith J (2010) Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 20(1):Google Scholar
- 4.National Institute of Clinical Excellence (2009) Guidelines on urinary incontinenceGoogle Scholar
- 7.Moore KH, O’Sullivan RJ, Simons A, Prashar S, Anderson P, Louey M (2003) Randomised controlled trial of nurse continence advisor therapy compared with standard urogynaecology regimen for conservative incontinence treatment: efficacy, costs and two year follow up. BJOG 110:649–657PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Bronken BA, Kirkevold M, Martinsen R, Wyller TB, Kvigne K (2012) Psychosocial well-being in persons with aphasia participating in a nursing intervention after stroke. Nurs Res Pract 568242Google Scholar
- 10.Miller JM, Sampselle C, Ashton-Miller J, Hong GR, DeLancey JO (2008) Clarification and confirmation of the Knack maneuver: the effect of volitional pelvic floor muscle contraction to preempt expected stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19(6):773–782PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Williams KS, Assassa RP, Gillies CL, Abrams KR, Turner DA, Shaw C, Haslam J, Mayne C, McGrother CW (2006) Leicestershire MRC incontinence study team. A randomized control trial of the effectiveness of pelvic floor therapies for urodynamic stress and mixed incontinence. BJU Int 98:1043–1050PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Castro RA, Aruda RM, Zanetti MR, Santos PD, Sartori MG, Girao MJ (2008) Single-blind, randomized controlled trial of pelvic floor muscle training, electrical stimulation, vaginal cones, and no active treatment in the management of stress urinary incontinence. Clinics (Sao-Paulo) 63:465–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Ogedegbe G, Schoenthaler A, Richardson T, Lewis L, Belue R, Espinosa E, Spencer J, Allegrante JP, Charlson ME (2007) An RCT of the effect of motivational interviewing on medication adherence in hypertensive African Americans: rationale and design. Contemp Clin Trials 28:169–181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar