Skip to main content

Perioperative management of gynecological surgery patients: does fellow involvement improve performance?

International Urogynecology Journal volume 24, pages 1025–1031 (2013)Cite this article

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Physicians-in-training play a role in guiding patient care, and their contributions may improve adherence to clinical practice guidelines. However, there is scant information in the literature assessing this impact on perioperative decision-making. The purpose of this study was to determine whether involvement of urogynecology fellows results in closer adherence to guidelines regarding perioperative management of gynecological patients.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing major gynecological surgery between 1 July 2009 and 30 June 2010. Charts were identified using surgical procedure codes (SPT) and subdivided into: urogynecology (fellow co-managed) or private gynecology patients. Information was collected regarding pre- and postoperative deep venous thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis, preoperative antibiotic type, dose, and timing.

Results

Included were 699 women: 564 (81.2%) private and 135 (19.4%) urogynecology patients. Significant differences were noted in preoperative DVT prophylaxis, with the fellow-managed group being treated appropriately more often (p = 0.001). Postoperative management of thromboprophylaxis, however, was not found to be significant (p = 0.163). When evaluating antibiotic utilization, both groups were similar with regard to the timing of cephalosporins. However, fellows were significantly superior in dosing antibiotics correctly (p = 0.023), and their selection of appropriate antibiotics for penicillin-allergic subjects approached significance (p = 0.052).

Conclusions

Fellow contributions toward clinical decisions resulted in more appropriate DVT prophylaxis and antibiotic administration prior to gynecological surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Whiteman MK, Hillis SD, Jamieson DJ, Morrow B, Podgornik MN, Brett KM, Marchbanks PA (2008) Inpatient hysterectomy surveillance in the United States, 2000–2004. Am J Obstet Gynecol 198:34.e1–34.e7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. De Lissovoy G, Fraeman K, Hutchins V, Murphy D, Vaughn BB (2009) Surgical site infection: incidence and impact on hospital utilization and treatment costs. Am J Infect Control 37:387–397

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Carey K, Stefos T, Shibei Z, Borzecki AM, Rosen AK (2011) Excess costs attributable to postoperative complications. Med Care Res Rev 68:490–503

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Graf K, Ott E, Vonberg RP et al (2011) Surgical site infections—economic consequences for the health care system. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396:453–459

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Duff P, Park RC (1980) Antibiotic prophylaxis in vaginal hysterectomy: a review. Obstet Gynecol 55 [Suppl]:193S–202S

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tanos V, Rojansky N (1994) Prophylactic antibiotics in abdominal hysterectomy. J Am Coll Surg 179:593–600

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mittendorf R, Aronson MP, Berry RE, Williams MA, Kupelnick B, Klickstein A et al (1993) Avoiding serious infections associated with abdominal hysterectomy: a meta-analysis of antibiotic prophylaxis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 169:1119–1124

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Geerts WH, Bergqvist D, Pineo GF, Heit JA, Samama CM et al (2008) Prevention of venous thromboembolism. Chest 133 [6 Suppl]:381S–453S

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Avorn J, Winkelmayer WC (2004) Comparing the costs, risks, and benefits of competing strategies for the primary prevention of venous thromboembolism. Circulation 110 [Suppl]:25–32

    Google Scholar 

  10. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2007) Prevention of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 84. Obstet Gynecol 110:429–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2009) Antibiotic prophylaxis for gynecologic procedures. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 104. Obstet Gynecol 113:1180–1189

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schleyer AM, Schreuder AB, Jarman KM, Logerfo JP, Goss JR (2011) Adherence to guideline directed venous thromboembolism prophylaxis among medical centers in surgical inpatients at 33 academic centers in the United States. Am J Med Qual 26:174–180

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wright JD, Herschman DL, Shah M, Burke WM et al (2011) Quality of perioperative venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in gynecologic surgery. Obstet Gynecol 118:978–986

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tseng WH, Jin L, Canter RJ, Martinez SR et al (2011) Surgical resident involvement is safe for common elective general surgery procedures. J Am Coll Surg 213:19–28

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Patel SP, Gauger PG, Brown DL, Englesbe MJ, Cederna PS (2010) Resident participation does not affect surgical outcomes, despite introduction of new techniques. J Am Coll Surg 211:540–545

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Coates KW, Kuehl TJ, Bachofen CG, Shull BL (2001) Analysis of surgical complications and patient outcomes in a residency training program. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184:1380–1385

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Amin AN, Stemkowski S, Lin J, Yang G (2008) Preventing venous thromboembolism in US hospitals: are surgical patients receiving appropriate prophylaxis? Thromb Haemost 99:796–797

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kakkar AK, Cohen AT, Tapson VF, Bergmann JF, Goldhaber SZ et al (2010) Venous thromboembolism risk and prophylaxis in the acute care hospital setting (ENDORSE survey): findings in surgical patients. Ann Surg 251:330–338

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Deitelzweig SB, Lin J, Hussein M, Battleman D (2010) Are surgical patients at risk of venous thromboembolism currently meeting the Surgical Care Improvement Project performance measure for appropriate and timely prophylaxis? J Thromb Thrombolysis 30:55–66

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Collier PE, Rudolph M, Ruckert D, Osella T, Collier NA, Ferrero M (1998) Are preoperative antibiotics administered preoperatively? Am J Med Qual 13:94–97

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ozgun H, Ertugrul BM, Soyder A, Ozturk B, Aydemir M (2010) Peri-operative antibiotic prophylaxis: adherence to guidelines and effects of educational intervention. Int J Surg 8:159–163

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. VanKasteren ME, Kullberg BJ, deBoer AS, Mintjes-de Groot J, Gyssens IC (2003) Adherence to local hospital guidelines for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis: a multicentre audit in Dutch hospitals. J Antimicrob Chemother 51:1389–1396

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Fahy BG, Bowe EA, Conigliaro J (2011) Perioperative antibiotic process improvement reaps rewards. Am J Med Qual 26:185–192

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Whitman G, Cowell V, Parris K, McCollough P et al (2008) Prophylactic antibiotic use: hardwiring of physician behavior, not education, leads to compliance. J Am Coll Surg 207:88–94

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rahn DD et al (2011) Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in gynecologic surgery: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 118:1111–1125

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Link BA, Nelson R, Josephson DY, Lau C, Wilson TG (2009) Training of urologic oncology fellows does not adversely impact outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. J Endourol 23:301–305

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Arbabi S, Jurkovich GJ, Rivara FP, Nathens AB et al (2003) Patient outcomes in academic medical centers: influence of fellowship programs and in-house on-call attending surgeon. Arch Surg 128:47–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Good Samaritan Hospital, 375 Dixmyth Avenue, Cincinnati, OH, 45220, USA

    Holly L. Steiner

  2. Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Good Samaritan Hospital, Cincinnati, OH, USA

    Catrina C. Crisp & Rachel N. Pauls

Authors
  1. Holly L. Steiner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Catrina C. Crisp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rachel N. Pauls
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Holly L. Steiner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Steiner, H.L., Crisp, C.C. & Pauls, R.N. Perioperative management of gynecological surgery patients: does fellow involvement improve performance?. Int Urogynecol J 24, 1025–1031 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1988-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1988-4

Keywords

  • Antibiotic prophylaxis
  • Fellows
  • Perioperative management
  • Thromboprophylaxis