Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Miniarc® single-incision sling for treatment of stress urinary incontinence: 2-year clinical outcomes

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

We report 2-year data on the effectiveness and safety of the MiniArc single-incision sling in women with stress urinary incontinence.

Methods

This multi-center, prospective, single-arm, industry-sponsored study measured the effectiveness of the MiniArc sling via quantitative (cough stress test and 1-h pad weight test) and qualitative (Urogenital Distress Inventory-Short Form and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-Short Form) measurements. The objective efficacy rate was defined as the number of patients with a negative cough stress test or 1-h pad weight test ≤ 1 g at 2 years. The subjective efficacy rate was determined by patient responses to the UDI-6 question # 3, “Do you experience, and if so, how much are you bothered by urine leakage related to physical activity, coughing, or sneezing?” Secondary objectives were to evaluate procedural variables of implantation and long-term safety.

Results

One hundred and eighty women with a mean age of 51.1 years were implanted in the study. Mean procedure time, blood loss, and length of stay were 11.0 min, 41.7 mL and 9.5 h respectively. At 2 years, 142 patients were available for analysis. The objective efficacy rates for the cough stress test (CST) and pad weight test (PWT) were 84.5 % and 80.1 % respectively and the subjective efficacy rate was 92.9 %. Median Urogenital Distress Inventory-Short Form and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-Short Form scores showed statistically significant improvement (p < .001). The most common adverse events included UTI (4.8 %), constipation (3.7 %), and temporary urinary retention (3.2 %).

Conclusion

MiniArc is a safe and effective surgical procedure for the treatment of SUI in women with follow-up through 2 years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AE:

Adverse events

BMI:

Body Mass Index

CST:

Cough stress test

EBL:

Estimated blood loss

EC:

Ethics Committee

IIQ-7:

Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-Short form

IRB:

Institutional Review Board

LFCF:

Last failure carried forward

LOS:

Length of stay

MOS:

Months

PWT:

One-hour Pad Weight Test

QoL:

Quality of life

SUI:

Stress urinary incontinence

UDI-6:

Urogenital Distress Inventory-Short form

USI:

Urodynamic stress incontinence

WBFPS:

Wong-Baker Faces Pain Scale

References

  1. Luber KM (2004) The definition, prevalence, and risk factors for stress urinary incontinence. Rev Urol 6 [Suppl 3]:S3–S9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Elser D (2010) Stress urinary incontinence: what qualities do women seek in treatment? Suppl OBG Manag 20(4):S1–S2

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nilsson CG, Palva K, Rezapour M, Falconer C (2008) Eleven years prospective follow-up of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 19:1043–1047

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Moore RD, Serel SR, Davila GW, Settle P (2009) Minimally invasive treatment for female stress urinary Incontinence (SUI): a review Including TVT, TOT, and mini-sling. Surg Technol Int 8:157–173

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ward K, Hilton P (2005) Minimally invasive synthetic suburethral slings: emerging complications. Obstet Gynaecol 7:223–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Richter HE, Albo ME, Zyczynski HM et al (2010) Retropubic versus transobturator midurethral slings for stress incontinence. N Engl J Med 362(22):2066–2076

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ogah J, Cody JD, Rogerson L (2009) Minimally invasive synthetic suburethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006375.pub2

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Oliveira R, Botelho F, Silva P, Resende A, Silva C, Dinis P et al (2011) Exploratory study assessing efficacy and complications of TVT-O, TVT-Secur, and MiniArc: results at 12-month follow-up. Eur Urol 59(6):940–944

    Google Scholar 

  9. De Ridder D, Berkers J, Deprest J, Verguts J, Ost D, Hamid D et al (2010) Single incision mini-sling versus a transobturator sling: a comparative study on MiniArc and Monarc slings. Intl Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 21:773–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kennelly M, Moore R, Nguyen J, Lukban JC, Siegel S (2010) Prospective evaluation of a single incision sling for stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 184:604–609

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Uebersax J, Wyman J, Shumaker S, McClish D, Fant J, Continence Program for Women Research Group (1995) Short forms to assess life quality and symptom distress for urinary incontinence in women: the incontinence impact questionnaire and the urogenital and the urogenital distress inventory. Neurol Urodyn 14:131–139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wong D, Hockenberry-Eaton M, Wilson D, Winkelstein MML, Ahmann E, DiViot-Thomas P (1999) Whaley and Wong’s nursing care of infants and children, 6th edn. Mosby, St. Louis

    Google Scholar 

  13. Moore RD, Mitchell GK, Miklos JR (2009) Single-center retrospective study of the technique, safety, and 12-month efficacy of the MiniArc™ single-incision sling: a new minimally invasive procedure for treatment of female SUI. Surg Technol Int 18:175–181

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Deole N, Kaufmann A, Arunkalaivanan A (2010) Evaluation of safety and efficacy in single-incision mid-urethral short tape procedure (MiniArc™ tape) for stress urinary incontinence under local anesthesia. Int Urogynecol J 22:335–339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Basu M, Duckett J (2010) Randomised trial of a retropubic tension-free vaginal tape versus a mini-sling for stress incontinence. BJOG 117:730–736

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Enzelsberger H, Cemer I, Enzelsberger S, Schalupny J (2010) MiniArc versus Monarc—a prospective randomized study of the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence with a follow-up of 2 years. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 70:499–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Howard D, Miller JM, Delancey JL, Ashton-Miller J (2000) Differential effects of cough, valsalva, and continence status on vesical neck movement. Obstet Gynecol 95:535–540

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Castillo-Pinto E, Sasson A, Pons J (2010) Comparison of retropubic and transobturator tension-free vaginal implants for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int J Gynecol Obstet 110:23–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Taweel W, Rabah D (2010) Transobturator tape for female stress incontinence: follow-up after 24 months. Can Urol Assoc J 4(1):33–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Holmgren C, Nilsson S, Lanner L, Helberg D (2005) Long-term Results with tension-free vaginal tape on mixed and stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 106:38–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Study investigators who also participated in the study: Dirk De Ridder, Christopher Graham, Kristi Keil, Christopher Klingele, John Miklos, Peter Pommerville, James Presthus, Stewart Pringle, Paul Siami, Jeffrey Snyder, Suzette Sutherland, Douglas VanDrie, and Stuart Weprin.

Conflicts of interest

This study was sponsored by American Medical Systems, which provided financial support for running the study, the coordination of data collection across the sites, and data analysis.

M.J. Kennelly: AMS (study support, consultant honoraria), Bard (study support, consultant honoraria), Coloplast (study support, consultant honoraria), Ethicon Women’s Health & Urology (study support, consultant honoraria)

R. Moore: AMS (study support, consultant honoraria)

J.N. Nguyen: AMS (study support, consultant honoraria)

J. Lukban: AMS (study support, consultant honoraria), Coloplast (study support, consultant honoraria), Novasys (consultant honoraria)

S. Siegel: AMS (study support, consultant honoraria), SUFU (Board member), NCS (Board member)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J Kennelly.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kennelly, M.J., Moore, R., Nguyen, J.N. et al. Miniarc® single-incision sling for treatment of stress urinary incontinence: 2-year clinical outcomes. Int Urogynecol J 23, 1285–1291 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1734-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1734-y

Keywords

Navigation