Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis
We report 2-year data on the effectiveness and safety of the MiniArc single-incision sling in women with stress urinary incontinence.
Methods
This multi-center, prospective, single-arm, industry-sponsored study measured the effectiveness of the MiniArc sling via quantitative (cough stress test and 1-h pad weight test) and qualitative (Urogenital Distress Inventory-Short Form and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-Short Form) measurements. The objective efficacy rate was defined as the number of patients with a negative cough stress test or 1-h pad weight test ≤ 1 g at 2 years. The subjective efficacy rate was determined by patient responses to the UDI-6 question # 3, “Do you experience, and if so, how much are you bothered by urine leakage related to physical activity, coughing, or sneezing?” Secondary objectives were to evaluate procedural variables of implantation and long-term safety.
Results
One hundred and eighty women with a mean age of 51.1 years were implanted in the study. Mean procedure time, blood loss, and length of stay were 11.0 min, 41.7 mL and 9.5 h respectively. At 2 years, 142 patients were available for analysis. The objective efficacy rates for the cough stress test (CST) and pad weight test (PWT) were 84.5 % and 80.1 % respectively and the subjective efficacy rate was 92.9 %. Median Urogenital Distress Inventory-Short Form and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-Short Form scores showed statistically significant improvement (p < .001). The most common adverse events included UTI (4.8 %), constipation (3.7 %), and temporary urinary retention (3.2 %).
Conclusion
MiniArc is a safe and effective surgical procedure for the treatment of SUI in women with follow-up through 2 years.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- AE:
-
Adverse events
- BMI:
-
Body Mass Index
- CST:
-
Cough stress test
- EBL:
-
Estimated blood loss
- EC:
-
Ethics Committee
- IIQ-7:
-
Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-Short form
- IRB:
-
Institutional Review Board
- LFCF:
-
Last failure carried forward
- LOS:
-
Length of stay
- MOS:
-
Months
- PWT:
-
One-hour Pad Weight Test
- QoL:
-
Quality of life
- SUI:
-
Stress urinary incontinence
- UDI-6:
-
Urogenital Distress Inventory-Short form
- USI:
-
Urodynamic stress incontinence
- WBFPS:
-
Wong-Baker Faces Pain Scale
References
Luber KM (2004) The definition, prevalence, and risk factors for stress urinary incontinence. Rev Urol 6 [Suppl 3]:S3–S9
Elser D (2010) Stress urinary incontinence: what qualities do women seek in treatment? Suppl OBG Manag 20(4):S1–S2
Nilsson CG, Palva K, Rezapour M, Falconer C (2008) Eleven years prospective follow-up of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 19:1043–1047
Moore RD, Serel SR, Davila GW, Settle P (2009) Minimally invasive treatment for female stress urinary Incontinence (SUI): a review Including TVT, TOT, and mini-sling. Surg Technol Int 8:157–173
Ward K, Hilton P (2005) Minimally invasive synthetic suburethral slings: emerging complications. Obstet Gynaecol 7:223–232
Richter HE, Albo ME, Zyczynski HM et al (2010) Retropubic versus transobturator midurethral slings for stress incontinence. N Engl J Med 362(22):2066–2076
Ogah J, Cody JD, Rogerson L (2009) Minimally invasive synthetic suburethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006375.pub2
Oliveira R, Botelho F, Silva P, Resende A, Silva C, Dinis P et al (2011) Exploratory study assessing efficacy and complications of TVT-O, TVT-Secur, and MiniArc: results at 12-month follow-up. Eur Urol 59(6):940–944
De Ridder D, Berkers J, Deprest J, Verguts J, Ost D, Hamid D et al (2010) Single incision mini-sling versus a transobturator sling: a comparative study on MiniArc and Monarc slings. Intl Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 21:773–778
Kennelly M, Moore R, Nguyen J, Lukban JC, Siegel S (2010) Prospective evaluation of a single incision sling for stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 184:604–609
Uebersax J, Wyman J, Shumaker S, McClish D, Fant J, Continence Program for Women Research Group (1995) Short forms to assess life quality and symptom distress for urinary incontinence in women: the incontinence impact questionnaire and the urogenital and the urogenital distress inventory. Neurol Urodyn 14:131–139
Wong D, Hockenberry-Eaton M, Wilson D, Winkelstein MML, Ahmann E, DiViot-Thomas P (1999) Whaley and Wong’s nursing care of infants and children, 6th edn. Mosby, St. Louis
Moore RD, Mitchell GK, Miklos JR (2009) Single-center retrospective study of the technique, safety, and 12-month efficacy of the MiniArc™ single-incision sling: a new minimally invasive procedure for treatment of female SUI. Surg Technol Int 18:175–181
Deole N, Kaufmann A, Arunkalaivanan A (2010) Evaluation of safety and efficacy in single-incision mid-urethral short tape procedure (MiniArc™ tape) for stress urinary incontinence under local anesthesia. Int Urogynecol J 22:335–339
Basu M, Duckett J (2010) Randomised trial of a retropubic tension-free vaginal tape versus a mini-sling for stress incontinence. BJOG 117:730–736
Enzelsberger H, Cemer I, Enzelsberger S, Schalupny J (2010) MiniArc versus Monarc—a prospective randomized study of the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence with a follow-up of 2 years. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 70:499–502
Howard D, Miller JM, Delancey JL, Ashton-Miller J (2000) Differential effects of cough, valsalva, and continence status on vesical neck movement. Obstet Gynecol 95:535–540
Castillo-Pinto E, Sasson A, Pons J (2010) Comparison of retropubic and transobturator tension-free vaginal implants for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int J Gynecol Obstet 110:23–26
Taweel W, Rabah D (2010) Transobturator tape for female stress incontinence: follow-up after 24 months. Can Urol Assoc J 4(1):33–36
Holmgren C, Nilsson S, Lanner L, Helberg D (2005) Long-term Results with tension-free vaginal tape on mixed and stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 106:38–43
Acknowledgements
Study investigators who also participated in the study: Dirk De Ridder, Christopher Graham, Kristi Keil, Christopher Klingele, John Miklos, Peter Pommerville, James Presthus, Stewart Pringle, Paul Siami, Jeffrey Snyder, Suzette Sutherland, Douglas VanDrie, and Stuart Weprin.
Conflicts of interest
This study was sponsored by American Medical Systems, which provided financial support for running the study, the coordination of data collection across the sites, and data analysis.
M.J. Kennelly: AMS (study support, consultant honoraria), Bard (study support, consultant honoraria), Coloplast (study support, consultant honoraria), Ethicon Women’s Health & Urology (study support, consultant honoraria)
R. Moore: AMS (study support, consultant honoraria)
J.N. Nguyen: AMS (study support, consultant honoraria)
J. Lukban: AMS (study support, consultant honoraria), Coloplast (study support, consultant honoraria), Novasys (consultant honoraria)
S. Siegel: AMS (study support, consultant honoraria), SUFU (Board member), NCS (Board member)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kennelly, M.J., Moore, R., Nguyen, J.N. et al. Miniarc® single-incision sling for treatment of stress urinary incontinence: 2-year clinical outcomes. Int Urogynecol J 23, 1285–1291 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1734-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1734-y