Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

What do we do when a midurethral tape fails? Rediscovery of open colposuspension as a salvage continence operation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Our aim was to evaluate the outcome of open colposuspension for women with urodynamic stress incontinence who had previously undergone a failed midurethral tape.

Methods

A retrospective study of 13 women who had undergone open colposuspension after a failed midurethral tape was conducted.

Results

At a median follow-up of 12 months, subjective and objective cure rate were 85% and 77%, respectively. Thirty percent of the women developed de novo detrusor overactivity that responded to antimuscarinic treatment. Long-term voiding difficulty was observed in only one patient, who performed clean intermittent self-catheterization for 3 months. Posterior vaginal wall prolapse requiring pelvic floor repair was found in three women (23%) postoperatively.

Conclusions

Open colposuspension is an effective option for treating persistent or recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed midurethral tape, with a high success rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ward KL, Hilton P, on behalf of the UK and Ireland TVT Trial Group (2008) Tension-free vaginal tape versus colposuspension for primary urodynamic stress incontinence: 5-year follow-up. BJOG 115:226–233

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ogah J, Cody JD, Rogerson L (2009) Minimally invasive synthetic suburethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD006375

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Barber MD, Kleeman S, Karram MM, Paraiso MF, Ellerkmann M, Vasavada S et al (2008) Risk factors associated with failure 1 year after retropubic or transobturator midurethral slings. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199:666.e1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Houwert RM, Venema PL, Aquarius AE, Bruinse HW, Roovers JP, Vervest HA (2009) Risk factors for failure of retropubic and transobturator midurethral slings. Am J Obstet Gynecol 201:202e1–202e8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Buckley BS, Grant AM, Tincello DG, Wagg AS, Firkins L (2010) Prioritizing research: Patients, carers, and clinicians working together to identify and prioritize important clinical uncertainties in urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 29:708–714

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee HN, Lee YS, Han JY, Jeong JY, Choo MS, Lee KS (2010) Transurethral injection of bulking agent for treatment of failed mid-urethral sling procedures. Int Urogynecol J 21:1479–1483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lo TS, Wang AC, Liang CC, Long CY, Lee SJ (2006) Treatment for unsuccessful tension-free vaginal tape operation by shortening pre-implanted tape. J Urol 175:2196–2200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. de Landsheere L, Lucot JP, Foidart JM, Cosson M (2010) Management of recurrent or persistent stress urinary incontinence after TVT-O by mesh readjustment. J Urogynecol J 21:1347–1351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee KS, Doo CK, Han DH, Jung BJ, Han JY, Choo MS (2007) Outcomes following repeat mid urethral synthetic sling after failure of the initial sling procedure: rediscovery of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure. J Urol 178:1370–1374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Liapis A, Bakas P, Creatsas G (2009) Tension-free vaginal tape in the management of recurrent urodynamic stress incontinence after previous failed midurethral tape. Eur Urol 55:1450–1458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Stav K, Dwyer PL, Rosamilia A, Schierlitz L, Lim YN, Chao F et al (2010) Repeat synthetic mid urethral sling procedure for women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 183:241–246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Palva K, Nilsson CG (2009) Effectiveness of the TVT procedure as a repeat mid-urethra operation for treatment of stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 20:769–774

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Schmid C, Bloch E, Amann E, Mueller MD, Kuhn A (2010) An adjustable sling in the management of recurrent urodynamic stress incontinence after previous midurethral tape. Neurourol Urodyn 29:573–577

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mourtzinos A, Maher MG, Raz S, Rodríguez LV (2008) Spiral sling salvage anti-incontinence surgery for women with refractory stress urinary incontinence: surgical outcome and satisfaction determined by patient-driven questionnaires. Urology 72:1044–1050

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. De Cuyper EM, Ismail R, Maher CF (2008) Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension after failed sub-urethral tape procedures: a retrospective audit. Int Urogynecol J 19:681–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P et al (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:10–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kelleher CJ, Cardozo LD, Khullar V, Salvatore S (1997) A new questionnaire to assess the quality of life of urinary incontinent women. BJOG 104:1374–1379

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Versi E, Cardozo LD (1986) Perineal pad weighing versus videographic analysis in genuine stress incontinence. BJOG 93:364–366

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Haylen BT, De Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J et al (2010) An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) / International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J 21:5–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cardozo L, Hextall A, Bailey J, Boos K (1999) Colposuspension after previous failed incontinence surgery: a prospective observational study. BJOG 106:340–344

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bidmead J, Cardozo L, McLellan A, Khullar V, Kelleher C (2001) A comparison of the objective and subjective outcomes of colposuspension for stress incontinence in women. BJOG 108:408–413

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sand PK, Bowen LW, Panganiban R, Ostergard DR (1987) The low pressure urethra as a factor in failed retropubic urethropexy. Obstet Gynecol 69:399–402

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hamer AM, Persson J (2010) Preoperative urethral parameters at rest and objective cure rate following laparoscopic colposuspension. Int Urogynecol J 21:331–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Harris N, Swithinbank L, Hayek SA, Yang Q, Abrams P (2011) Can maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP) be used to predict outcome of surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence? Neurourol Urodyn [Epub ahead of print]

  25. Cardozo LD, Stanton SL, Williams JE (1979) Detrusor instability following surgery for genuine stress incontinence. Br J Urol 51:204–207

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Auwad W, Bombieri L, Adekanmi O, Waterfield M, Freeman R (2006) The development of pelvic organ prolapse after colposuspension: a prospective, long-term follow-up study on the prevalence and predisposing factors. Int Urogynecol J 17:389–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Robinson D, Anders K, Cardozo L, Bidmead J, Dixon A, Balmforth J et al (2003) What do women want? Interpretation of the concept of cure. J Pelvic Med Surg 9:273–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Cardozo L, Drutz HP, Baygani SK, Bump RC (2004) Pharmacological treatment of women awaiting surgery for stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 104:511–519

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Duckett J, Vella M, Kavakuntla G, Basu M (2007) Tolerability and efficacy of duloxetine in a non-trial situation. BJOG 114:543–547

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Riad M, Familusi A, El Sayad M, Abdel-Fattah M (2011) Current practice in the UK for the assessment and management of recurrent stress urinary incontinence in women. Int Urogynecol J 22(Suppl 1):S63–S65

    Google Scholar 

  31. Patil A (2011) How do urogynaecologist treat failed suburethral slings? Experience from the british society of urogynaecology database and literature review. Int Urogynecol J 22(Suppl 1):S21

    Google Scholar 

  32. Keegan PE, Atiemo K, Cody J, McClinton S, Pickard R (2007) Periurethral injection therapy for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD003881

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

I Giarenis - Speaker honorarium: Astellas

H Mastoroudes - None

L Cardozo - Consultant: AdvaMed, Astellas, Ethicon, Merck, Pfizer, Teva; Speaker honorarium: Astellas, Merck, Pfizer; Trial participation: Pfizer, Boston Scientific

D Robinson – Consultant: Astellas, Ferring, Gynaecare, Uroplasty, Pfizer, Recordati, Novo-Nordisc; Speaker honorarium: Astellas, Ferring, Gynaecare, Uroplasty, Pfizer, Recordati;Trial participation: Astellas, Pfizer, Boston Scientific

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ilias Giarenis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Giarenis, I., Mastoroudes, H., Cardozo, L. et al. What do we do when a midurethral tape fails? Rediscovery of open colposuspension as a salvage continence operation. Int Urogynecol J 23, 1117–1122 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1720-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1720-4

Keywords

Navigation