Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis
This study aims to compare the prognostic value of two obstetric fistula classification systems.
Methods
Prospective analysis of 202 patients evaluated for obstetric fistula (OF) at the General Referral Hospital of Panzi, Bukavu, DRC, from April through December 2009. Fistula classification using both Goh’s and Waaldijk’s systems, as well as preoperative, surgical, and follow-up assessment were included. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were used to compare the accuracy of the two systems to discriminate successful closure from persistent fistula.
Results
Two hundred two women underwent fistula repair. Ten were lost to follow-up. At longest follow-up, 181 patients (88.3%) had successful fistula closure. On multivariate analysis, the independent variables of multiparity and a primary or secondary repair were more likely to have a successful closure. In Waaldijk’s system, no single component was more predictive of successful closure than another. In Goh’s system, type 4 fistulae were more likely to have failed closure compared to those with type 1 or 2 (p = 0.0144). When comparing ROC curves, Goh’s system had significantly better ability to predict successful closure than the Waaldijk’s system, p = 0.0421.
Conclusions
Waaldijk and Goh are the two most commonly used obstetric fistula classification systems. In this series of OF patients at Panzi Hospital in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Goh’s classification system demonstrated a significantly better prediction of OF closure than the Waaldijk’s system.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hancock B, Browning A (2005) Practical obstetric fistula surgery. Royal Society of Medicine Press Ltd., London
Goh J, Browning A, Berhan N, Chang A (2008) Predicting the risk of failure of closure of obstetric fistula and residual incontinence using a classification system. Int Urogynecol J 19:1659–1662
Murray C, Goh J, Fynes M, Carey M (2002) Urinary and faecal incontinence following delayed primary repair of obstetric genital fistula. BJOG 109:828–832
Waaldijk K (2004) The immediate management of fresh obstetric fistula. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191(3):795–799
Kirschner C, Yost K, Du H, Karshima J, Arrowsmith S, Wall L (2010) Obstetric fistula: the ECWA Evangel VVR Center surgical experience from Jos, Nigeria. Int Urogynecol J 21:1525–1533
Goh J, Stanford EJ, Genadry R (2009) Classification of female genitor-urinary tract fistula: a comprehensive review. Int Urogynecol J 20:605–610
Waaldijk K (1985) Surgical classification of obstetric fistula. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 49:161–163
Goh JTW, Browning A, Berhan B, Chang A (2008) Predicting the risk of failure of closure of obstetric fistula and residual urinary incontinence using a classification system. Int Urogynecol J 19(12):1659–1662
Sims J (1952) On the treatment of vesico-vaginal fistula. Am J Med Sci 53:59–82
Mahfouz N (1929) Urinary and recto-vaginal fistulae in women. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp 36:581–589
McConnachie E (1958) Fistulae of the urinary tract in the female. SA Med J 32:524–527
Moir JC (1956) Personal experience in the treatment of vesicovaginal fistulas. Am J Obstet Gynecol 71:476–491
Bird GC (1967) Obstetric vesico-vaginal and allied fistulae. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Common 74:749–752
Lawson JB (1968) Birth-canal injuries. Proc R Soc Med 61:22–24
Hamlin R, Nicholson E (1969) Reconstruction of the urethra totally destroyed in labor. BMJ 2:147–150
Arrowsmith S (2007) The classification of obstetric vesico-vaginal fistulas: an evidence-based approach. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 99:S25–S27
Muleta M, Rasmussen S, Kiserud T (2010) Obstetric fistula in 14,928 Ethiopian women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 89(7):945–951
Lewis A, Kaufman M, Wolter C, Philips S, Maggi D, Condry L, Dmochowski R, Smith J (2009) Genitourinary fistula experience in Sierra Leone: review of 505 cases. J Urol 181(4):1725–1731
Rijken Y, Chilopora G (2007) Urogenital and rectovaginal fistulas in southern Malawi: a report on 407 reports. Int J Gynecol Obstet 99:S85–S89
Wall L, Karshima J, Kirschner C, Arrowsmith S (2004) The obstetric vesicovaginal fistula: characteristics of 899 patients from Jos, Nigeria. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190:1011–1019
Nardos R, Browning A, Chen C (2009) Risk factors that predict failure after repair of obstetric vesicovaginal fistulae. Am J Obstet Gynecol 20(5):578e1–578e4
Roenneburg M, Genadry R, Wheeless C (2006) Repair of obstetric vesicovaginal fistulas in Africa. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195:1748–1752
Browning A (2006) Risk factors for developing residual urinary incontinence after obstetric fistula repair. BJOG 116:482–485
Hilton P, Ward A (1998) Epidemiological and surgical aspects of urogenital fistulae: a review of 25 years’ experience in southeast Nigeria. Int J Pelvic Floor Dysfunc 9(4):189–194
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Dr. Charles Ascher-Walsh for his conceptual support, advice, and guidance.
Conflicts of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Capes, T., Stanford, E.J., Romanzi, L. et al. Comparison of two classification systems for vesicovaginal fistula. Int Urogynecol J 23, 1679–1685 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1671-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1671-9