Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Modified laparoscopic extraperitoneal uterine suspension to anterior abdominal wall: the easier way to treat uterine prolapse

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

To report the outcomes of modified laparoscopic extraperitoneal uterine suspension to anterior abdominal wall for uterine prolapse using mesh.

Methods

Twenty-two patients with uterovaginal prolapse, stage 2 or greater according to pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q), and with desire for uterine preservation, underwent modified laparoscopic extraperitoneal uterine suspension to the anterior abdominal wall bilaterally using mesh. The outcomes were measured by POP-Q and quality-of-life questionnaires. Intraoperative or postoperative complications were also observed.

Results

Patient age was 61.4 ± 12 years, and parity was 3.3 ± 1.8. After surgery, there was significant improvement in POP-Q measurements of Ba, Bp, and C (P < 0.001). The objective cure rate at 1 year was 100%. A significant improvement in quality-of-life scores was observed (P < 0.001). There were no major intraoperative or postoperative complications. However, all patients reported postoperative dragging pain at the points of puncture ports where the mesh was fixed to the abdominal wall. The visual analog scale decreased from a mean 3-day score of 2.9–0 at 1-month follow-up.

Conclusions

Modified laparoscopic extraperitoneal uterine suspension to the anterior abdominal wall using mesh is a feasible and effective method for treating uterine prolapse and is easy to perform.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL (1997) Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 89(4):501–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen G, Ling B, Li J, Xu P, Hu W, Zhao W et al (2010) Laparoscopic extraperitoneal uterine suspension to anterior abdominal wall bilaterally using synthetic mesh to treat uterovaginal prolapse. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17(5):631–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC (2005) Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstet Gynecol 193(1):103–13

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rogers RG, Coates KW, Kammerer-Doak D, Khalsa S, Qualls C (2003) A short form of the pelvic organ prolapse/urinary incontinence sexual questionnaire (PISQ-12). Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 14(3):164–8, discussion 8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Barranger E, Fritel X, Pigne A (2003) Abdominal sacrohysteropexy in young women with uterovaginal prolapse: long-term follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189(5):1245–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jelovsek JE, Maher C, Barber MD (2007) Pelvic organ prolapse. Lancet 369(9566):1027–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lin LL, Ho MH, Haessler AL, Betson LH, Alinsod RM, Liu CY et al (2005) A review of laparoscopic uterine suspension procedures for uterine preservation. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 17(5):541–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Arthure HG, Savage D (1957) Uterine prolapse and prolapse of the vaginal vault treated by sacral hysteropexy. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp 64(3):355–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Seracchioli R, Hourcabie JA, Vianello F, Govoni F, Pollastri P, Venturoli S (2004) Laparoscopic treatment of pelvic floor defects in women of reproductive age. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 11(3):332–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cutner A, Kearney R, Vashisht A (2007) Laparoscopic uterine sling suspension: a new technique of uterine suspension in women desiring surgical management of uterine prolapse with uterine conservation. BJOG 114(9):1159–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rosenblatt PL, Chelmow D, Ferzandi TR (2008) Laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy for the treatment of uterine prolapse: a retrospective case series report. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15(3):268–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Price N, Slack A, Jackson SR (2010) Laparoscopic hysteropexy: the initial results of a uterine suspension procedure for uterovaginal prolapse. BJOG 117(1):62–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Arthure HG (1949) Vault-suspension. Proc R Soc Med 42(6):388–90

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jia X, Glazener C, Mowatt G, MacLennan G, Bain C, Fraser C et al (2008) Efficacy and safety of using mesh or grafts in surgery for anterior and/or posterior vaginal wall prolapse: systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 115(11):1350–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We thank Dr. Yuanyuan Zhou of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Anhui Provincial Hospital, Hefei, China, who contributed to the data collection for this article. This work was supported by the Key Research Project of the Provincial Health Department (No. 2010A003), Anhui Province, China.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bin Ling.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, G., Wu, D., Zhao, W. et al. Modified laparoscopic extraperitoneal uterine suspension to anterior abdominal wall: the easier way to treat uterine prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 23, 887–891 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1661-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1661-y

Keywords

Navigation