Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Preoperative voiding detrusor pressures do not predict stress incontinence surgery outcomes: reply to Digesu et al.

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Digesu GA, Derpapas A, Khullar V (2011) Comment on Kirby et al.: preoperative voiding detrusor pressures do not predict stress incontinence surgery outcomes. Int Urogynecol J. doi:10.1007/s00192-011-1576-z

  2. Kirby AC, Nager CW, Litman HJ et al (2011) Preoperative voiding detrusor pressures do not predict stress incontinence surgery outcomes. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 22(6):657–663. doi:10.1007/s00192-010-1336-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Digesu GA, Khullar V, Candiani M (2008) Re: urodynamic measures do not predict stress continence outcomes after surgery for stress urinary incontinence in selected women: C. W. Nager, M. FitzGerald, S. R. Kraus, T. C. Chai, H. Zyczynski, L. Sirls, G. E. Lemack, L. K. Lloyd, H. J. Litman, A. M. Stoddard, J. Baker and W. Steers for the Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network. J Urol 179:1470–1474, J Urol. 2009 Jan; 181(1):415–6; author reply 6–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hilton P (2002) Trials of surgery for stress incontinence–thoughts on the ‘Humpty Dumpty principle’. Bjog 109(10):1081–1088

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Digesu GA, Khullar V, Cardozo L, Sethna F, Salvatore S (2004) Preoperative pressure-flow studies: useful variables to predict the outcome of continence surgery. BJU Int 94(9):1296–1299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Panayi DC, Duckett J, Digesu GA et al (2009) Pre-operative opening detrusor pressure is predictive of detrusor overactivity following TVT in patients with pre-operative mixed urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 28(1):82–85

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nager CW, Albo ME, Fitzgerald MP et al (2007) Process for development of multicenter urodynamic studies. Urology 69(1):63–67, Discussion, 7–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schafer W, Abrams P, Liao L et al (2002) Good urodynamic practices: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies. Neurourol Urodyn 21(3):261–274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lewis P, Abrams P (2000) Urodynamic protocol and central review of data for clinical trials in lower urinary tract dysfunction. BJU Int 85(Suppl 1):20–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sullivan J, Lewis P, Howell S et al (2003) Quality control in urodynamics: a review of urodynamic traces from one centre. BJU Int 91(3):201–207

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Zimmern P, Nager CW, Albo M, Fitzgerald MP, McDermott S (2006) Interrater reliability of filling cystometrogram interpretation in a multicenter study. J Urol 175(6):2174–2177

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nager CW, Albo ME, Fitzgerald MP et al (2007) Reference urodynamic values for stress incontinent women. Neurourol Urodyn 26(3):333–340

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network (UITN), Division of Urogynecology, Department of Reproductive Medicine, UC San Diego Medical Center, San Diego, CA, USA

    Charles W. Nager

Authors
  1. Charles W. Nager
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles W. Nager.

Additional information

Dr. Nager wrote this reply on behalf of the Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network (UITN).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nager, C.W. Preoperative voiding detrusor pressures do not predict stress incontinence surgery outcomes: reply to Digesu et al.. Int Urogynecol J 23, 381–382 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-011-1577-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-011-1577-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation