Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis
Iatrogenic female urethral obstruction resulting from sling operations may be related to surgical inexperience and must be better understood. Although there are no widely recognized parameters for this type of study, a single-surgeon consecutive series offers an opportunity to study the role of expertise in sling operations over time.
Methods
This study consecutively examined 176 women who underwent an autologous fascial sling procedure. Postoperative urethral obstruction was identified by the occurrence of voiding dysfunctions. Clinically obstructed patients were invited to undergo a postoperative urodynamic evaluation after 3 months. To enable comparison, patients were placed into 6-month groups according to the time of surgery.
Results
A total of 159 cases were evaluated with a mean follow-up time of 32.4 ± 13.4 months. Stress continence was cured in 97.5% of cases. Although 29 patients were identified as obstructed, only 20 underwent a postoperative urodynamic evaluation. Only five of the clinically obstructed cases showed a high P det Q max. All of the other cases met one or more of the non-classic parameters linked to obstruction. Overactive bladder was present in 14 (63.6%) of the obstructed cases. Iatrogenic urethral obstruction was more common among the early cases (30.4%) than among the later ones (5%) (P < 0.001). Postoperative urodynamic evaluation showed a trend toward obstruction on pressure flow studies.
Conclusions
Autologous fascial sling operations require expertise and involve a clear surgical learning curve. Iatrogenic obstruction in females does not fit a single model and may be difficult to recognize. Obstruction in females must be identified through clinical indicators and postoperative urinary complaints rather than the high detrusor pressure observed in men. Furthermore, iatrogenic female obstruction can probably be minimized but not eliminated.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Buostead GB (2002) The tension-free vaginal tape for treating female stress urinary incontinence. BJU Int 89:687–691
Starkman JS, Duffy JW, Wolter CE, Kaufman MR, Scarpero HM, Dmochowski RR (2008) The evolution of obstruction induced overactive bladder symptoms following urethrolysis for female bladder outlet obstruction. J Urol 179:1018–1021
Basu M, Duckett JR, Papanikolaou N (2008) Retropubic urethrolysis of colposuspension: does it improve voiding and overactive bladder symptoms? J Obstet Gynaecol 28:783–788
Blaivas JG (1991) Pubovaginal fascial sling for the treatment of complicated stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 145:1214–1219
Mcguire EJ, Bennett CJ, Konnak JA et al (1987) Experience with the pubovaginal sling for urinary incontinence at the University of Michigan. J Urol 138:525–526
Petros PE, Ulmsten UI (1993) An integral theory and its method for the diagnosis and management of female urinary incontinence. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl 153:1–13
Nilsson CG, Falconer C, Rezapour M (2004) Seven-year follow-up of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for treatment of urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 104:1259–1264
McLennan MT, Melick CF (2005) Bladder perforation during tension-free vaginal tape procedures: analysis of learning curve and risk factors. Obstet Gynecol 106:1000–1004
Schraffordt Koops SE, Bisseling TM, Heintz AP, Vervest HA (2005) Prospective analysis of complications of tension-free vaginal tape from The Netherlands Tension-free Vaginal Tape study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193:45–50
Levin I, Groutz A, Gold R, Pauzner D, Lessing JB, Gordon D (2004) Surgical complications and medium-term outcome results of tension-free vaginal tape: a prospective study of 313 consecutive patients. Neurourol Urodyn 23:7–9
Leach GE, Dmochowski RR, Appell RA et al (1997) Female stress urinary incontinence clinical guidelines panel summary report on surgical management of female urinary incontinence. J Urol 158:875–881
Leng WW, Davies BJ, Tarin T, Sweeney DD, Chancellor M (2004) Delayed treatment of bladder outlet obstruction after sling surgery: association with irreversible bladder dysfunction. J Urol 172:1379–1382
Lin TAL, Wang SJ, Chne KK, Chang LS (2005) In vivo tension sustained by fascial sling in pubovaginal sling surgery for female stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 173:894–897
Shek KL, Chantarasorn V, Dietz HP (2010) The urethral motion profile before and after suburethral sling placement. J Urol 183:1450–1454
Dietz HP, Ellis G, Wilson PD, Herbison P (2004) Voiding function after tension-free vaginal tape: a longitudinal study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynecol 44:152–155
Doo CK, Hong B, Chung BJ, Kim JY, Jung HC, Lee KS, Choo MS (2006) Five-year outcomes of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Eur Urol 50:333–536
Lukacz ES, Luber KM, Nager CW (2004) The effects of the tension-free vaginal tape on voiding function: a prospective evaluation. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 15:32–37
Rodrigues P, Hering F, Nesrallah L (2001) Patterns of urodynamic female obstruction. J Urol 165:77–81
Nitti VW, Tu LM, Gitlin J (1999) Diagnosing bladder outlet obstruction in women. J Urol 161:153–157
Deng DY, Rutman M, Raz S, Rodriguez LV (2007) Presentation and management of major complications of midurethral slings: are complications under-reported? Neurourol Urodyn 26:46–51
Barber MD, Kleeman S, Karram MM, Paraiso MF, Walters MD, Vasavada S, Ellerkmann M (2008) Transobturator tape compared with tension-free vaginal tape for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 111:611–615
Martan A, Svabik K, Masata J, Koleska T, El-Haddad R, Pavlikova M (2009) Initial experience with a short, tension-free vaginal tape (the tension-free vaginal tape secur system). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 143:121–126
Conflicts of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rodrigues, P., Hering, F. The role of a surgical learning curve in urethral obstruction following autologous fascial sling: a case-series study. Int Urogynecol J 23, 211–216 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-011-1575-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-011-1575-0