Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Anterior sacrospinous ligament fixation associated with paravaginal repair using the Pinnacle™ device: an anatomical study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The objective of this paper is to study the reproducibility and anatomical risks of anterior sacrospinous ligament (SSL) fixation associated with paravaginal repair using the Pinnacle™ device (Boston Scientific™).

Methods

Simplified bilateral anterior SSL fixation associated with paravaginal fixation through the arcus tendineus fascia pelvis (ATFP) was performed on five fresh cadavers using the Pinnacle™ device. Cadaver dissection was then performed by open pelvic surgery.

Results

Eight SSL and ten ATFP were available for analysis. SSL fixations were optimal in four cases, too superficial in three cases, and too high in one case. Mean distance between SSL fixation and ischial spine was 18.6 mm (range 10 to 30 mm). Mean distance between SSL fixation and pudendal nerve was 6.5 mm (range 0 to 15 mm). ATFP fixations were optimal in five cases, good in four cases, and too superficial in one case. In one case (10%), the middle arm of the prosthesis was in contact with the ureter and traction on that arm resulted in ureteral kinking.

Conclusions

Anterior SSL fixation associated with paravaginal repair using the Pinnacle™ device was not reproducible every time in this cadaver study. These results confirm the need for specific training before starting anterior SSL fixations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lousquy R, Costa P, Delmas V, Haab F (2009) Update on the epidemiology of genital prolapse. Prog Urol 19:907–915

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Misraï V, Rouprêt M, Seringe E, Vaessen C, Cour F, Haertig A et al (2008) Long-term results of laparoscopic sacral colpopexy for high-grade cystoceles. Prog Urol 18:1068–1074

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Richter K (1968) The surgical anatomy of the vaginaefixatio sacrospinalis vaginalis. A contribution to the surgical treatment of vaginal blind pouch prolapse. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 28:321–327

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Richardson D, Scotti R, Ostergard D (1989) Surgical management of uterine prolapse in young women. J Reprod Med 34:388–392

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Estrade J, Agostini A, Roger V, Dallay D, Blanc B, Cravello L (2005) Posthysterectomy prolapse: results of sacrospinous ligament fixation. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 34:481–487

    Google Scholar 

  6. Beer M, Kuhn A (2005) Surgical techniques for vault prolapse: a review of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 119:144–155

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Amarenco G, Lanoe Y, Perrigot M, Goudal H (1987) A new canal syndrome: compression of the pudendal nerve in Alcock’s canal or perinal paralysis of cyclists. Presse Med 16:399

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Barksdale P, Gasser R, Gauthier C, Elkins T, Wall L (1997) Intraligamentous nerves as a potential source of pain after sacrospinous ligament fixation of the vaginal apex. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 8:121–125

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Winkler H, Tomeszko J, Sand P (2000) Anterior sacrospinous vaginal vault suspension for prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 95:612–615

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Goldberg R, Tomezsko J, Winkler H, Koduri S, Culligan P, Sand P (2001) Anterior or posterior sacrospinous vaginal vault suspension: long-term anatomic and functional evaluation. Obstet Gynecol 98:199–204

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ouzaid I, Ben Rhouma S, de Tayrac R, Costa P, Prudhomme M, Delmas V (2010) Mini-invasive posterior sacrospinous ligament fixation using the CAPIO needle driver: an anatomical study. Prog Urol 20:515–519

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Meschia M, Bruschi F, Amicarelli F, Pifarotti P, Marchini M, Crosignani P (1999) The sacrospinous vaginal vault suspension: critical analysis of outcomes. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 10:155–159

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sagsoz N, Ersoy M, Kamaci M, Tekdemir I (2002) Anatomical landmarks regarding sacrospinous colpopexy operations performed for vaginal vault prolapse. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 101:74–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Roshanravan S, Wieslander C, Schaffer J, Corton M (2007) Neurovascular anatomy of the sacrospinous ligament region in female cadavers: implications in sacrospinous ligament fixation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 197:660.e1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. de Tayrac R, Boileau L, Fara J, Monneins F, Raini C, Costa P (2010) Bilateral anterior sacrospinous ligament suspension associated with a paravaginal repair with mesh: short-term clinical results of a pilot study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 21:293–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bader G (2009) The obturator foramen: the intersection of all the dangers? Gynecol Obstet Fertil 37:687–688

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Touboul C, Nizard J, Fauconnier A, Bader G (2008) Major venous hemorrhagic complication during transvaginal cystocele repair using the transobturator approach. Obstet Gynecol 111:492–495

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Latthe P, Foon R, Toozs-Hobson P (2007) Transobturator and retropubic tape procedures in stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness and complications. BJOG 114:522–531

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hazewinkel M, Hinoul P, Roovers J (2009) Persistent groin pain following a trans-obturator sling procedure for stress urinary incontinence: a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20:363–365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

This study was supported by Boston Scientific, and R. de T., P.C., and V.D. are consultants for Boston Scientific.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mélanie Cayrac.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cayrac, M., Letouzey, V., Ouzaid, I. et al. Anterior sacrospinous ligament fixation associated with paravaginal repair using the Pinnacle™ device: an anatomical study. Int Urogynecol J 23, 335–340 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-011-1554-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-011-1554-5

Keywords

Navigation