Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Vaginal hysterectomy and risk of pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence surgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

This study aims to determine the risk of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) surgery related to mode of hysterectomy focusing on vaginal hysterectomy.

Methods

We performed a nationwide cohort study. Women exposed to hysterectomy on benign indications (n = 118,601) were compared to women unexposed to hysterectomy (n = 579,200). The outcome was defined as first occurrence of POP or SUI surgery. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using Cox proportional-hazards models.

Results

The greatest risks of POP (HR 4.9, 95% CI 3.4–6.9) or SUI surgery (HR 6.3, 95% CI 4.4–9.1) were observed subsequent to vaginal hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse. Having a vaginal hysterectomy for other reasons also significantly increased the risks of POP and SUI surgery compared to other modes of hysterectomy.

Conclusions

Hysterectomy in general, in particular vaginal hysterectomy, was associated with an increased risk for subsequent POP and SUI surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr L, Garry R (2005) Methods of hysterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 330:1478–1486

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Lethaby A, et al. (2009) Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. CD003677

  3. Whiteman MK, Hillis SD, Jamieson DJ et al (2008) Inpatient hysterectomy surveillance in the United States, 2000–2004. Am J Obstet Gynecol 198(34):e1–e7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lundholm C, Forsgren C, Johansson AL, Cnattingius S, Altman D (2009) Hysterectomy on benign indications in Sweden 1987–2003: a nationwide trend analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 88:52–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brummer TH, Jalkanen J, Fraser J et al (2009) FINHYST 2006—national prospective 1-year survey of 5 279 hysterectomies. Hum Reprod 24(10):2515–2522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mant J, Painter R, Vessey M (1997) Epidemiology of genital prolapse: observations from the Oxford Family Planning Association Study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104:579–585

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jelovsek JE, Maher C, Barber MD (2007) Pelvic organ prolapse. Lancet 24(369):1027–1038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Altman D, Falconer C, Cnattingius S, Granath F (2008) Pelvic organ prolapse surgery following hysterectomy on benign indications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 198(572):e1–e6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brown JS, Sawaya G, Thom DH, Grady D (2000) Hysterectomy and urinary incontinence: a systematic review. Lancet 12(356):535–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Swift SE, Pound T, Dias JK (2001) Case-control study of etiologic factors in the development of severe pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogyn J 12:187–192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jackson SL, Scholes D, Boyko EJ, Abraham L, Fihn SD (2006) Predictors of urinary incontinence in a prospective cohort of postmenopausal women. Obstet Gynecol 108:855–862

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Altman D, Granath F, Cnattingius S, Falconer C (2007) Hysterectomy and risk for stress-urinary-incontinence surgery: nationwide cohort study. Lancet 370:1494–1499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pakbaz M, Mogren I, Lofgren M (2009) Outcomes of vaginal hysterectomy for uterovaginal prolapse: a population-based, retrospective, cross-sectional study of patient perceptions of results including sexual activity, urinary symptoms, and provided care. BMC Womens Health 9:9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nilsson A, Spetz C, Carsjö K, Nightingale R, Smedby B (1994) Reliability of the hospital registry. The diagnostic data are better than their reputation. Lakartidningen 91:603–605

    Google Scholar 

  15. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP (2007) The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 20(370):1453–1457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL (1997) Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 89:501–506

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kjolhede P, Wahlstrom J, Wingren G (2005) Pelvic floor dysfunction after Burch colposuspension–a comprehensive study. Part I. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 84:894–901

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Parys BT, Woolfenden KA, Parsons KF (1990) Bladder dysfunction after simple hysterectomy: urodynamic and neurological evaluation. Eur Urol 17:129–133

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. DeLancey JO (1997) The pathophysiology of stress urinary incontinence in women and its implications for surgical treatment. World J Urol 15:268–274

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Swift SE (2000) The distribution of pelvic organ support in a population of female subjects seen for routine gynecologic health care. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:277–285

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Weber AM, Richter HE (2005) Pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 106:615–634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dällenbach P, Kaelin-Gambirasio I, Dubuisson J-B, Boulvain M (2007) Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse repair after hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 110:625–632

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Forsgren C, Zetterstrom J, Lopez A, Altman D (2008) Risk factors for vaginal vault prolapse surgery in postmenopausal hysterectomized women. Menopause 15:1115–1119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Symmonds RE, Williams TJ, Lee RA, Webb MJ (1981) Posthysterectomy enterocele and vaginal vault prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 140:852–859

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wiersma TG, Mulder CJ, Reeders JW, Tytgat GN, Van Waes PF (1994) Dynamic rectal examination (defecography). Baillieres Clin Gastroenterol 8:729–741

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Karasick S, Spettell CM (1997) The role of parity and hysterectomy on the development of pelvic floor abnormalities revealed by defecography. AJR Am J Roentg 169:1555–1558

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Milsom I (2009) Lower urinary tract symptoms in women. Curr Opin Urol 19:337–341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catharina Forsgren.

Additional information

The study was presented in part at the Nordic Urogynecological Association annual meeting, Copenhagen, Denmark, January 22–23, 2010.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Forsgren, C., Lundholm, C., Johansson, A.L.V. et al. Vaginal hysterectomy and risk of pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence surgery. Int Urogynecol J 23, 43–48 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-011-1523-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-011-1523-z

Keywords

Navigation