Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Is cesarean section a real panacea to prevent pelvic organ disorders?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The aim of this study is to compare the pelvic floor muscle strength after vaginal delivery vs. after cesarean section.

Methods

Five groups of 50 cases each were designated as follows: nullipara (control group), spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD), repeat SVD (SVD-R), cesarean section (CS), and repeat CS (CS-R). Perineometric measurements, stress urinary incontinence (SUI) symptoms, pelvic organ prolapse quantification examinations, and Incontinence-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (IQOL) were evaluated.

Results

In all delivery groups, pelvic muscle strength was significantly lower than the control group (65.10 ± 15.69, 56.29 ± 17.39, 54.28 ± 20.08, 56.82 ± 17.62, and 57.92 ± 16.45 (cm H2O± SD) for the control, SVD, SVD-R, CS, and CS-R groups, respectively; p < 0.05). However, no significant difference was found among the delivery groups. There were significant differences in SUI symptoms between the control (2%) and SVD-R (26%) groups and between the SVD (10%) and SVD-R groups (p < 0.001 and p = 0.037, respectively). No statistically significant correlations between IQOL and perineometric measurements were noted (r = 0.097 and p = 0.598).

Conclusions

Pregnancy increases postpartum muscle weakness independent of the mode of delivery. Increased SUI symptoms are associated with vaginal delivery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kenton K, Mueller ER (2006) The global burden of female pelvic floor disorders. Br J Urol 98:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bo K, Sherburn M (2005) Evaluation of female pelvic-floor muscle function and strength. Phys Ther 85(3):269–282

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Allen RE, Hosker GL, Smith AR, Warrell DW (1990) Pelvic floor damage and childbirth: a neurophysiological study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 97(9):770–779

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gregory WT, Nygaard I (2004) Childbirth and pelvic floor disorders. Clin Obstet Gynecol 47:394–403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Swash M, Snooks SJ, Henry MM (1985) Unifying concept of pelvic floor disorders and incontinence. J R Soc Med 78(11):906–911

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Petros PE (2010) Diagnosis of connective tissue damage. In: Petros PE (ed) The female pelvic floor—function, dysfunction and management according to the integral theory, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin, pp 50–82

    Google Scholar 

  7. Petros PE, Ulmsten U (1990) An integral theory of female urinary incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 69(Suppl 153):1–79

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wagner TH, Patrick DL, Bavendam TG, Martin ML, Buesching DP (1996) Quality of life of persons with urinary incontinence: development of a new measure. Urology 47(1):67–71, discussion 71–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Serati M, Salvatore S, Khullar V, Uccella S, Bertelli E, Ghezzi F, Bolis P (2008) Prospective study to assess risk factors for pelvic floor dysfunction after delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 87(3):313–318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Viktrup L, Lose G, Rolff M, Barfoed K (1992) The symptoms of stress incontinence caused by pregnancy or delivery in primiparas. Obstet Gynecol 79:945–949

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sampselle CM, DeLancey J, Ashton-Miller J (1996) Urinary incontinence in pregnancy and postpartum. Neurourol Urodyn 15:329–330

    Google Scholar 

  12. Høiberg K, Salvig JD, Winsløw NA, Lose G, Secher NJ (1999) Urinary incontinence: prevalence and risk factors at 16 weeks of gestation. BJOG 106:842–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ball TL, Douglas GR, Fulkerson LL (1950) Topographic urethrography (part II). Am J Obstet Gynecol 69(6):1252–1259

    Google Scholar 

  14. Francis WJA (1960) Disturbance of bladder function in relation to pregnancy. Journal of Obstets & Gynaecol of British Empire 67:353–366

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Petros PE, Ulmsten U (1997) Role of the pelvic floor in bladder neck opening and closure: I muscle forces. Int Urogynecol J 8:74–80

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Petros PE, Ulmsten U (1997) Role of the pelvic floor in bladder neck opening and closure: II vagina. Int Urogynecol J 8:69–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bø K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P, Shull BL, Smith AR (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175(1):10–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Thompson JA, O'Sullivan PB, Briffa NK, Neumann P (2006) Assessment of voluntary pelvic floor muscle contraction in continent and incontinent women using transperineal ultrasound, manual muscle testing and vaginal squeeze pressure measurements. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17(6):624–630

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hintze J (2001) NCSS and PASS. Number Cruncher Statistical Systems. Kaysville, Utah. http://www.ncss.com. Accessed 15 Jun 2009

  20. Hundley AF, Wu JM, Visco AG (2005) A comparison of perineometer to brink score for assessment of pelvic floor muscle strength. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:1583–1591

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Patel PD, Amrute KV, Badlani GH (2007) Pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence: a review of etiological factors. Indian J Urol 23(2):135–141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bø K, Kvarstein B, Hagen R, Larsen S (1990) Pelvic floor muscle exercise for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: II. Validity of vaginal pressure measurements of pelvic floor muscle strength and the necessity of supplementary methods for control of correct contraction. Neurourol Urodyn 9:479–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dougherty MC, Abrams R, McKey PL (1986) An instrument to assess the dynamic characteristics of the circumvaginal musculature. Nurs Res 35:202–206

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bø K, Finckenhagen HB (2001) Vaginal palpation of pelvic floor muscle strength: inter-test reproducibility and comparison between palpation and vaginal squeeze pressure. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80:883–887

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Frawley H, Galea M, Phillips B, Sherburn M, Bø K (2006) Effect of test position on pelvic floor muscle assessment. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17:365–371

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Groutz A, Rimon E, Peled S et al (2004) Cesarean section: does it really prevent the development of postpartum stress urinary incontinence? A prospective study of 363 women one year after their first delivery. Neurourol Urodyn 23:2–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Van Brummen HJ, Bruinse HW, van de Pol G, Heintz AP, van der Vaart CH (2007) The effect of vaginal and Caesarean delivery on lower urinary tract symptoms: what makes the difference? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18(2):133–139

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bushnell DM, Martin ML, Summers KH, Svihra J, Lionis C, Patrick DL (2005) Quality of life of women with urinary incontinence: cross-cultural performance of 15 language versions of the I-QOL. Qual Life Res 14(8):1901–1913

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fleming N, Newton ER, Roberts J (2003) Changes in postpartum perineal muscle function in women with and without episiotomies. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health 48:53–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Marshall K, Walsh DM, Baxter GD (2002) The effect of a first vaginal delivery on the integrity of the pelvic floor musculature. Clin Rehabil 16(7):795–799

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Caroci Ade S, Riesco ML, Sousa Wda S, Cotrim AC, Sena EM, Rocha NL, Fontes CN (2010) Analysis of pelvic floor musculature function during pregnancy and postpartum: a cohort study: (a prospective cohort study to assess the PFMS by perineometry and digital vaginal palpation during pregnancy and following vaginal or caesarean childbirth). J Clin Nurs 19(17–18):2424–2433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. McKinnie V, Swift SE, Wang W et al (2005) The effect of pregnancy and mode of delivery on the prevalence of urinary and fecal incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193:512–518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Borello-France D, Burgio KL, Richter HE et al (2006) Fecal and urinary incontinence in primiparous women. Obstet Gynecol 108(4):863–872

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Press JZ, Klein MC, Kaczorowski J, Liston RM, von Dadelszen P (2007) Does cesarean section reduce postpartum urinary incontinence? A systematic review. Birth 34(3):228–237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. MacLennan AH, Taylor AW, Wilson DH, Wilson D (2000) The prevalence of pelvic floor disorders and their relationship to gender, age, parity and mode of delivery. BJOG 107(12):1460–1470

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Wilson PD, Herbison R, Herbison GP (1996) Obstetric practice and the prevalence of urinary incontinence three months after delivery. BMJ 103:154–161

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Farrel SA, Allen VM, Baskett TF (2001) Parturition and urinary incontinence in primiparas. Obstet Gynecol 97(3):350–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Peyrat L, Haillot O, Bruyere F, Boutin JM, Bertrand P, Lanson Y (2002) Prevalence and risk factors of urinary incontinence in young and middle-aged women. Br J Urol Int 89:61–66

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Rortveit G, Daltveit AK, Hannestad YS, Hunskaar S (2003) Urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery or cesarean section. N Engl J Med 348:900–907

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lal M, H Mann C, Callender R, Radley S (2003) Does cesarean delivery prevent anal incontinence? Obstet Gynecol 101(2):305–312

  41. Fitzpatrick M, O’Herlihy C (2001) The effects of labour and delivery on the pelvic floor. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 15(1):63–79

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Norton C, Hosker G, Brazzelli M (2006) Biofeedback and/or sphincter exercises for the treatment of faecal incontinence in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Issue 3, Art. No. CD002111

  43. Zanetti MRD, Castro RA, Rotta AL, Santos PD, Sartori M, Girão MJBC (2007) Impact of supervised physiotherapeutic pelvic floor exercises for treating female stress urinary incontinence. São Paulo Med J 125:265–269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Castro RA, Arruda RM, Zanetti RD, Santos PD, Sartori MGF, Girão MJBC (2008) Single-blind, randomised, controlled trial of pelvic floor muscle training, electrical stimulation, vaginal cones and no active treatment in the management of stress urinary incontinence. Clinics 63:465–472

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Örnö AK, Marsál K, Herbst A (2008) Ultrasonographic anatomy of perineal structures during pregnancy and immediately following obstetric injury. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 32:527–534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. der Zalm PJ Voorham-van, Nijeholt GAB Lycklama à, Elzevier HW, Putter H, Pelger RCM (2008) Diagnostic investigation of the pelvic floor: a helpful tool in the approach in patients with complaints of micturition, defecation and/or sexual dysfunction. J Sex Med 5:864–871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Braekken IH, Majida M, Engh ME, Bø K (2009) Test-retest reliability of pelvic floor muscle contraction measured by 4D ultrasound. Neurourol Urodyn 28:68–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Rechberger T, Uldbjerg N, Oxlund H (1988) Connective tissue changes in the cervix during normal pregnancy and pregnancy complicated by a cervical incompetence. Obstets Gynecol 71:563–567

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Petros PE, Swash M, Kakulas B (2008) Stress urinary incontinence results from muscle weakness and ligamentous laxity in the pelvic floor. J Pelviperineology 27:107–109

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Salih Ergocen, M.Sc. (Department of Biostatistics—Ankara University School of Medicine) for his contribution to the statistical analysis section of this study and Scribendi for their professional editing service. This research has been supported by Scientific Research Projects Unit of AIBU.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Onder Koc.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koc, O., Duran, B., Ozdemırcı, S. et al. Is cesarean section a real panacea to prevent pelvic organ disorders?. Int Urogynecol J 22, 1135–1141 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-011-1457-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-011-1457-5

Keywords

Navigation